Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T22:21:26.473Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of different thermal wall boundary conditions on compressible turbulent channel flow at M=1.5

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2006

S. TAMANO
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi-ken 466-8555, Japan
Y. MORINISHI
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi-ken 466-8555, Japan

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to clarify the effect of thermal wall boundary conditions on turbulence statistics and structures in a compressible turbulent flow. This work is an extension of Morinishi et al. (J. Fluid Mech. vol. 502, 2004, p. 273), who performed DNS of compressible turbulent channel flow between adiabatic and isothermal walls at Mach number $M\,{=}\,1.5$ (Case 2). We address the question of whether the modification of turbulence statistics is attributable to the effect of the adiabatic wall boundary condition or the effect of the increase of wall temperature caused by the adiabatic wall boundary condition. New DNS of the compressible turbulent channel flow between isothermal walls with the wall temperature difference at the Mach number $M=1.5$ (Case 1) and DNS of the corresponding incompressible turbulent flow with passive scalar transport (Case I) are performed. The present study shows that the mean temperature profile near the high-temperature wall for Case 1 has an additional maximum due to the friction work, while such an additional maximum does not appear for Cases 2 and I. The additional maximum leads to a corresponding near-wall maximum of temperature fluctuations. We find the direction of energy transfer due to pressure work near the adiabatic wall for Case 2 being opposite to that near the isothermal wall to be due to the effect of the high-temperature wall, not to the effect of the adiabatic wall. These findings are explained by using the budgets of internal energy and temperature variance transport equations.

Type
Papers
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)