Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T11:37:26.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of base topography on dynamics and transition in a dense granular flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

S. Bharathraj  and
V. Kumaran Open the ORCID record for V. Kumaran [Opens in a new window]
S. Bharathraj*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
V. Kumaran
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560 012, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of base roughness on the transition and dynamics of a dense granular flow down an inclined plane is examined using particle based simulations. Different types of base topographies, rough bases made of frozen particles in either random or hexagonally ordered configurations, as well as sinusoidal bases with height modulation in both the flow and the spanwise directions, are examined. The roughness (characteristic length of the base features scaled by the flowing particle diameter) is defined as the ratio of the base amplitude and particle diameter for sinusoidal bases, and the ratio of frozen and moving particle diameters for frozen-particle bases. There is a discontinuous transition from an ordered to a disordered flow at a critical base roughness for all base topographies studied here, indicating that it is a universal phenomenon independent of base topography. The transition roughness does depend on the base configuration and the height of the flow, but is independent of the contact model and is less than 1.5 times the flowing particle diameter for all of the bases considered here. The bulk rheology is independent of the base topography, and follows the Bagnold law for both the ordered and the disordered flows. The base topography does have a dramatic effect on the flow dynamics at the base. For flows over frozen-particle bases, there is ordering down to the base for ordered flows, and the granular temperature is comparable to that in the bulk. There is virtually no velocity slip at the base, and the mean angular velocity is equal to one-half of the vorticity down to the base. For flows over sinusoidal bases, there is significant slip at the base, and the mean angular velocity is approximately an order of magnitude higher than that in the bulk within a region of height approximately one particle diameter at the base. This large particle spin results in a disordered and highly energetic layer of approximately 5–10 particle diameters at the base, where the granular temperature is an order of magnitude higher than that in the bulk. Thus, this study reveals the paradoxical result that gentler base topographies result in large slip and large agitation at the base, whereas rougher topographies such as frozen-particle bases result in virtually no slip and no agitation at the base for both ordered and disordered flows.

JFM classification

Complex Fluids: Complex Fluids Granular media: Granular media
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 832 , 10 December 2017 , pp. 600 - 640
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, B. J. & Wainwright, T. E. 1957 Phase transition for a hard sphere system. J. Chem. Phys. 27, 1208–1209.Google Scholar
Baran, O., Ertas, D., Halsey, T. C., Grest, G. S. & Lechman, J. B. 2006 Velocity correlations in dense gravity-driven granular chute flow. Phys. Rev. E 74, 051302.Google Scholar
Bougie, J., Kreft, J., Swift, J. B. & Swinney, H. L. 2005 Onset of patterns in an oscillated granular layer: continuum and molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. E 71, 021301.Google Scholar
Brey, J. J. & Dufty, J. W. 2005 Hydrodynamic modes for a granular gas from kinetic theory. Phys. Rev. E 72, 011303.Google Scholar
Brey, J. J., Dufty, J. W., Kim, C. S. & Santos, Andrés 1998 Hydrodynamics for granular flow at low density. Phys. Rev. E 58, 4638–4653.Google Scholar
Brey, J. J., Ruiz-Montero, M. J. & Moreno, F. 2006 Hydrodynamic profiles for an impurity in an open vibrated granular gas. Phys. Rev.  E 73, 031301.Google Scholar
Brey, J. J., Ruiz-Montero, M. J., Moreno, F. & Garcia-Rojo, R. 2002 Transversal inhomogeneities in dilute vibrofluidized granular fluids. Phys. Rev. E 65, 061302.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. 2011 Clusters in dense-inertial granular flows. J. Fluid Mech. 687, 341–359.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 2002 Granular shear flows at the elastic limit. J. Fluid Mech. 465, 261–291.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. S. 2005 Stress-controlled elastic granular shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 539, 273–297.Google Scholar
Cole, D. M. & Peters, J. F. 2007 A physically based approach to granular media mechanics: grain-scale experiments, initial results and implications to numerical modeling. Granul. Matt. 9, 309–321.Google Scholar
Cole, D. M. & Peters, J. F. 2008 Grain-scale mechanics of geologic materials and lunar simulants under normal loading. Granul. Matt. 10, 171–185.Google Scholar
Cundall, P. A. & Strack, O. D. L. 1979 A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29, 47–65.Google Scholar
Erpenbeck, J. J. 1984 Shear viscosity of the hard-sphere fluid via nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1333–1335.Google Scholar
Ertas, D. & Halsey, T. C. 2002 Granular gravitational collapse and chute flow. Europhys. Lett. 60, 931–937.Google Scholar
Garzo, V. & Dufty, J. W. 1999 Dense fluid transport for inelastic hard spheres. Phys. Rev. E 59, 5895–5911.Google Scholar
Goldhirsch, I. & Sela, N. 1996 Origin of normal stress differences in rapid granular flows. Phys. Rev. E 54, 4458–4461.Google Scholar
Haff, P. K. 1983 Grain flow as a fluid-mechanical phenomenon. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 401–430.Google Scholar
Hui, K., Haff, P. K., Ungar, J. E. & Jackson, R. 1984 Boundary conditions for high-shear grain flows. J. Fluid Mech. 145, 223–233.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. 2006 Dense shearing flows of inelastic disks. Phys. Fluids 18, 103307–103315.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. 2007 Dense inclined flows of inelastic spheres. Granul. Matt. 10, 47–52.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1985 Grad’s 13-moment system for a dense gas of inelastic spheres. Arch. Rat. Mech. Anal. 87, 355–377.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. T. & Richman, M. W. 1986 Boundary conditions for plane flows of smooth, nearly elastic, circular disks. J. Fluid Mech. 171, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jop, P. 2015 Rheological properties of dense granular flows. C. R. Physique 16, 62–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jop, P., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2006 A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441, 727–730.Google Scholar
Kamrin, K. & Henann, D. L. 2015 Nonlocal modeling of granular flows down inclines. Soft Matt. 11, 179–185.Google Scholar
Kirkpatrick, T. R., Das, S. P., Ernst, M. H. & Piasecki, J. 1990 Kinetic theory of transport in a hard sphere crystal. J. Chem. Phys. 92, 3768–3780.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 1998a Kinetic theory for a vibro fluidised bed. J. Fluid Mech. 364, 163–185.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 1998b Temperature of a granular material ‘fluidized’ by external vibrations. Phys. Rev. E 57, 5660–5664.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2004 Constitutive relations and linear stability of a sheared granular flow. J. Fluid Mech. 506, 1–42.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. 2006 The constitutive relation for the granular flow of rough particles, and its application to the flow down an inclined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 561, 1–42.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 2008 Dense granular flow down an inclined plane: from kinetic theory to granular dynamics. J. Fluid Mech. 599, 121–168.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 2009a Dynamics of a dilute sheared inelastic fluid. I. Hydrodynamic modes and velocity correlation functions. Phys. Rev. E 79, 011301.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 2009b Dynamics of a dilute sheared inelastic fluid. II. The effect of correlations. Phys. Rev. E 79, 011302.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 2009c Dynamics of dense sheared granular flows. Part I. Structure and diffusion. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 109–144.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V 2009d Dynamics of dense sheared granular flows. Part II. The relative velocity distribution. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 145–109.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Bharathraj, S. 2013 The effect of base roughness on the development of a dense granular flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 25, 070604.Google Scholar
Kumaran, V. & Maheshwari, S. 2012 Transition due to base roughness in the dense granular flow down an inclined plane. Phys. Fluids 24, 053302.Google Scholar
Louge, M.-Y. 2003 Model for dense granular flows down bumpy surfaces. Phys. Rev. E 67, 061303.Google Scholar
Lun, C. K. K. 1991 Kinetic theory for the flow of dense, slightly inelastic, slightly rough spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 233, 539–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lun, C. K. K., Savage, S. B., Jeffrey, D. J. & Chepurniy, N. 1984 Kinetic theories for granular flow: inelastic particles in Couette flow and slightly inelastic particles in a general flowfield. J. Fluid Mech. 140, 223–256.Google Scholar
Lutsko, J. F. 2004 Rheology of dense polydisperse granular fluids under shear. Phys. Rev. E 70, 061101.Google Scholar
Lutsko, J. F., Dufty, J. W. & Das, S. P. 1989 Fluctuations and dissipation in a fluid under shear: linear dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 39, 1311–1324.Google Scholar
Maheshwari, S. & Kumaran, V. 2012 The effect of base dissipation on the granular flow down an inclined plane. Granul. Matt. 14, 209–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MiDi, G. D. R. 2004 On dense granular flows. Eur. Phys. J. E 14, 341–365.Google Scholar
Mitarai, N., Hayakawa, H. & Nakanishi, H. 2002 Collisional granular flow as a micropolar fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 174301.Google Scholar
Mitarai, N. & Nakanishi, H. 2005 Bagnold scaling, density plateau, and kinetic theory analysis of dense granular flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 128001.Google Scholar
Mohan, L. S., Rao, K. K. & Nott, P. R. 2002 A frictional Cosserat model for the slow shearing of granular materials. J. Fluid Mech. 457, 377–409.Google Scholar
Nott, P. R. 2011 Boundary conditions at a rigid wall for rough granular gases. J. Fluid Mech. 678, 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orpe, A. V., Kumaran, V., Reddy, K. A. & Kudrolli, A. 2008 Fast decay of the velocity autocorrelation function in dense shear flow of inelastic hard spheres. Europhys. Lett. 84, 64003.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O. 1999 Scaling laws in granular flows down rough inclined planes. Phys. Fluids 11, 542–548.Google Scholar
Ramirez, R., Risso, D. & Cordero, P. 2000 Thermal convection in fluidized granular systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1230–1233.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. A. & Kumaran, V. 2007 Applicability of constitutive relations from kinetic theory for dense granular flows. Phys. Rev. E 76, 061305.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. A. & Kumaran, V. 2010 Dense granular flow down an inclined plane: a comparison between the hard particle model and soft particle simulations. Phys. Fluids 22, 113302.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B & Jeffrey, D. J. 1981 The stress tensor in a granular flow at high shear rates. J. Fluid Mech. 110, 255–272.Google Scholar
Sela, N. & Goldhirsch, I. 1998 Hydrodynamic equations for rapid flows of smooth inelastic spheres, to Burnett order. J. Fluid Mech. 361, 41–74.Google Scholar
Sela, N., Goldhirsch, I. & Noskowicz, S. H. 1996 Kinetic theoretical study of a simply sheared two dimensional granular gas to Burnett order. Phys. Fluids 8, 2337–2353.Google Scholar
Silbert, L. E., Ertas, D., Grest, G. S., Halsey, T. C., Levine, D. & Plimpton, S. J. 2001 Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. Phys. Rev. E 64, 051302.Google Scholar
Silbert, L. E., Grest, G. S., Plimpton, S. J. & Levine, D. 2002 Boundary effects and self-organization in dense granular flows. Phys. Fluids 14, 2637–2646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, R., Mareschal, M. & Risso, D. 1999 Departure from Fourier’s law for fluidized granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5003–5006.Google Scholar
Sunthar, P. & Kumaran, V. 1999 Temperature scaling in a dense vibrofluidized granular material. Phys. Rev. E 60, 1951–1955.Google Scholar
Sunthar, P. & Kumaran, V. 2001 Characterization of the stationary states of a dilute vibrofluidized granular bed. Phys. Rev. E 64, 041303.Google Scholar
Walton, O. R. 1993 Numerical simulation of inclined chute flows of monodisperse, inelastic, frictional spheres. Mech. Mater. 16, 239–247.Google Scholar
Weinhart, T., Thornton, A. R., Luding, S. & Bokhove, O. 2012 Closure relations for shallow granular flows from particle simulations. Granul. Matt. 14, 531–552.Google Scholar
Young, D. A. & Alder, B. J. 1974 Studies in molecular dynamics. XIII. Singlet and pair distribution functions for hard-disk and hard-sphere solids. J. Chem. Phys. 60 (4), 1254–1267.Google Scholar