Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T02:06:24.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The dynamics of the near field of strong jets in crossflows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Sergio L. V. Coelho  and
J. C. R. Hunt
Sergio L. V. Coelho
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK Present address: Programma de Mecanica, COPPE/UFRJ, Cidade Universitairia, CP 68503-CEP 21945, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An inviscid three-dimensional vortex-sheet model for the near field of a strong jet issuing from a pipe into a crossflow is derived. The solution for this model shows that the essential mechanisms governing this idealized flow are the distortion of the main transverse vorticity by the generation of additional axial and transverse vorticity within the pipe owing to the pressure gradients induced by the external flow, and the convection of both components of vorticity from the upwind side of the jet to its downwind side.

The deformation of the cross-section of the jet which is predicted by this model is compared with the deformation predicted by the commonly used time-dependent two-dimensional vortex-sheet model. Differences arise because the latter model does not take into account the effects of the transport of the transverse component of vorticity. The complete three-dimensional vortex-sheet model leads to a symmetrical deformation of the jet cross-section and no overall deflection of the jet in the direction of the stream.

To account for viscous effects, the initial region of a strong jet issuing into a uniform crossflow is modelled as an entraining three-dimensional vortex sheet, which acts like a sheet of vortices and sinks, redistributing the vorticity in the bounding shear layer and inducing non-symmetrical deformations of the cross-section of the jet. This leads to a deflection of the jet in the direction of the stream, and the loci of the centroids of the cross-sections of the jet describe a quadratic curve.

Deformations predicted by each of the three models are compared with measurements obtained from photographs of the cross-sections of a jet of air emerging into a uniform crossflow in a wind tunnel. Mean velocity measurements around the jet made with a hot-wire anemometer agree with the theory; they clearly invalidate models of jets based on ‘pressure drag’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 200 , March 1989 , pp. 95 - 120
Copyright
© 1989 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramovich, G. N.: 1963 The Theory of Turbulent Jets. MIT Press.
Adler, D. & Baron, A., 1979 Prediction of a three-dimensional circular turbulent jet in cross flow. AIAA J. 17, 168–174.Google Scholar
Andreopoulos, J. & Rodi, W., 1984 Experimental investigation of jets in a crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 138, 93–127.Google Scholar
Braodwell, J. E. & Breidenthal, R. E., 1984 Structure and mixing of a transverse jet in incompressible flow. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 405–412.Google Scholar
Chang-Lu, H.: 1942 Aufrallung eines Zylindrischen Strahles Durch Querwind. Doctoral thesis, University of Goettingen.
Durando, N. A.: 1971 Vortices induced in a jet by a subsonic cross flow. AIAA J. 9, 325–327.Google Scholar
Endo, H.: 1974 A working hypothesis for predicting the path and induced velocity of a jet exhausting at a large angle into a uniform cross-flow. Trans. Japan Soc. Aero. Space Sci. 17, 45–64.Google Scholar
Fearn, R. & Weston, R. P., 1974 Vorticity associated with a jet in a cross flow. AIAA J. 12, 1666–1671.Google Scholar
Foss, J. F.: 1980 Interaction region phenomena for the jet in a cross-flow problem. Rep. SFB 80/E/161. University of Karlsruhe.
Head, M. R. & Bandyopadhyay, P., 1981 New aspects of turbulent boundary-layer structure. J. Fluid Mech. 107, 297–338.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O.: 1959 Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
Hoerner, S. F.: 1965 Fluid Dynamic Drag, pp. 3.1–3.28. S. F. Hoerner.
Hoult, D. P. & Weil, J. C., 1972 Turbulent plume in a laminar cross flow. Atmos. Environ. 6, 513–531.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Abell, C. J., Peterka, J. A. & Woo, H., 1978 Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles; applying topology to flow visualization. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 179–200.Google Scholar
Kamotani, Y. & Greber, I., 1972 Experiments on a turbulent jet in a cross flow. AIAA J. 10, 1425–1429.Google Scholar
Karagozian, A. R. & Greber, I., 1984 An analytical model for the vorticity associated with a transverse jet. AIAA 17th Fluid Dyn. Plas. Dyn. Las. Conf.Google Scholar
Makihata, T. & Miyai, Y., 1979 Trajectories of single and double jets injected into a crossflow of arbitrary velocity distribution. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 101, 217–223.Google Scholar
Margason, R. J.: 1969 Analytical description of jet-wake cross sections for a jet normal to a subsonic free stream. NASA Rep. SP-218, pp. 131–139.Google Scholar
Maskell, E. C. & Spence, D. A., 1959 A theory of the jet flap in three dimensions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 251, 407–425.Google Scholar
Milne-Thomson, L. M.: 1960 Theoretical Hydrodynamics, 4th edn. Macmillan.
Moore, D. W.: 1978 The equation of motion of a vortex layer of small thickness. Stud. Appl. Maths 58, 119–140.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R.: 1984 The generation and decay of vorticity. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 28, 277–308.Google Scholar
Moussa, Z. M., Trischka, J. W. & Eskinazi, S., 1977 The near field in the mixing of a round jet with a cross-stream. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 49–80.Google Scholar
Needham, D. J., Riley, N. & Smith, J. H. B. 1988 A jet in crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 188, 159–184.Google Scholar
Pai, S.: 1954 Fluid Dynamics of Jets. D. Van Nostrand.
Platten, J. L. & Keffer, J. F., 1968 Entrainment in deflected axisymmetric jets at various angles to the stream. Rep. TP 6808. University of Toronto.
Rajaratnam, N.: 1976 Turbulent Jets - Developments in Water Sciences No. 5. Elsevier.
Rottman, J. W. & Simpson, J. E., 1984 The initial development of gravity currents from fixed-volume releases of heavy fluids. In Proc. IUTAM Symp. on Atmospheric Dispersion of Heavy Gases and Small Particles, Delft, pp. 347–359.Google Scholar
Rottman, J. W., Simpson, J. E. & Stansby, P. K., 1987 The motion of a cylinder of fluid released from rest in a cross-flow. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 307–337.Google Scholar
Schatzmann, M.: 1979 An integral model of plume rise. Atmos. Environ. 13, 721–731.Google Scholar
Sucec, J. & Bowley, W. W., 1976 Predictions of the trajectory of a turbulent jet injected into a crossflowing stream. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 98, 667–673.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. I., Lewellen, W. S. & Parker, S. F., 1986 On the vorticity dynamics of a turbulent jet in a crossflow. J. Fluid Mech. 168, 393–413.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I.: 1958 Flow induced by jets. J. Aero. Space Sci. 25, 464–465.Google Scholar