Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:16:37.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The distortion of turbulence by general uniform irrotational strain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

A. J. Reynolds  and
H. J. Tucker
A. J. Reynolds
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, England
H. J. Tucker
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Windsor, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the measured response of grid turbulence to three limiting types of uniform homogeneous strain: plane straining, axisymmetric elongation and axisymmetric flattening. Straining was achieved by allowing the turbulence to be convected through suitable distorting ducts; the maximum strain ratios were 5·8, 6·0 and 2·3, respectively. An attempt is made, using rapid-distortion theory, to specify an effective strain which accounts for the initial anisotropy of the grid turbulence; in the experiments, this effect was most important for the third species of strain. The maximum effective strain ratios were calculated as 4·05, 7·2 and 2·75, respectively. The rapid-distortion results are able to describe several features of the response of the turbulence with good accuracy: (i) the variation of total turbulence energy through the experimental ducts; (ii) the tendency of one component (that in the direction of the (larger) negative strain) to contain one-half of the turbulence energy after only moderate straining; and (iii) the changes in dimensionless structure parameters composed of ratios of component intensities. The first kind of prediction requires that the concurrent decay be specified in a simple way; (ii) and (iii) require that the initial anisotropy be taken into account. The predictions (iii) are generally less accurate than the others. The degree of success achieved by the rapid-distortion hypo-thesis is rather surprising, since the strain rates in the experiments were not as large as those for which the theory might have been expected to be valid. It is concluded that successful models of turbulence must provide a vorticity amplification essentially like that of rapid-distortion theory. However, the simple distorting flows considered here may not provide severe tests of more refined models, since many features of the response have already been accounted for.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 68 , Issue 4 , 29 April 1975 , pp. 673 - 693
Copyright
© 1975 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. & Proudman, I. 1954 The effect of rapid distortion of a fluid in turbulent motion. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7, 83–103.Google Scholar
Champagne, F. H., Harris, V. G. & Corrsin, S. 1970 Experiments on nearly homogeneous turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 81–139.Google Scholar
Comte-Bellot, G. & Corrsin, S. 1966 The use of a contraction to improve the isotropy of grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 25, 657–682.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1961 Effects of inhomogeneity and of shear flow in weak turbulent fields. Phys. Fluids, 4, 1187–1198.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1963 Turbulent heat transfer and temperature fluctuations in a field with uniform velocity and temperature gradients. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 6, 257–270.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1966 Weak locally homogeneous turbulence in idealized flow through a cone. N.A.S.A. Tech. Note, D-3613.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. G. 1967 Weak locally homogeneous turbulence and heat transfer with uniform normal strain. N.A.S.A. Tech. Note, D-3779.Google Scholar
Deissler, R. O. 1970 Effect of initial condition on weak homogeneous turbulence with uniform shear. Phys. Fluids, 13, 1868–1869.Google Scholar
Dowden, J. M. 1972 The relaxation of stress in a v-fluid with reference to the decay of homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 641–656.Google Scholar
Dowden, J. M. 1974 A v-fluid model of homogeneous turbulence subjected to uniform mean distortion. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 33–50.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 1964 Velocity correlations in weak turbulent shear flows. Phys. Fluids, 7, 562–564.Google Scholar
Hanjalić, K. & Launder, B. E. 1972 A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 609–638.Google Scholar
Harlow, F. H. & Romero, N. C. 1969 Turbulence distortion in a non-uniform stream. Los Alanzos Sci. Lab., University of California, Rep. LA-4247.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. 1973 A theory of turbulent flow round two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 625–706.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R. & Mulhearn, P. J. 1973 Turbulent dispersion from sources near two-dimensional obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 245–274.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1970 Toward a turbulent constitive relation. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 413–434.Google Scholar
MacPhail, D. C. 1944 Turbulence changes in contracting and distorted passages. Royal Aircraft Estab., Farnborough, Aero. Rep. no. 1928.Google Scholar
Maréchal, J. 1967a Disposif expérimental pour l’étude de la deformation plane de la turbulence homogbne. C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, A 265, 69–71.Google Scholar
Maréchal, J. 1967b Anisotropie d'une turbulence de grille déformée par un champ de vitesse moyenne homogéne. C.r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, A 265, 478–480.Google Scholar
Maréchal, J. 1972 Étude expérimentale de la déformation plane d'une turbulence homogéne. J. Mécanique, 11, 263–294.Google Scholar
Mills, R. R. & Corrsin, S. 1959 Effect of contraction on turbulence and temperature fluctuations generated by a warm grid. N.A.S.A. Memo. no. 5–5–59W.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. R. A. 1959 The effect of uniform distortion on weak homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 274–288.Google Scholar
Proudman, I. 1970 On the motion of v-fluids. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 563–603.Google Scholar
Ribner, H. S. & Tucker, M. 1953 Spectrum of turbulence in a contracting stream. N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 1113.Google Scholar
Rose, W. G. 1970 Interaction of grid turbulence with a uniform mean shear. J. Fluid Mech. 44, 767–779.Google Scholar
Rotta, J. C. 1962 Turbulent boundary layers in incompressible flow. Prog. Aero. Sci. 2, 1–219.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1935 Turbulence in a contracting stream. Z. angew. Math. Mech. 15, 91–96.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1954 The uniform distortion of homogeneous turbulence. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 7, 104–127.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.
Townsend, A. A. 1970 Entrainment and the structure of turbulent flow. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 13–46.Google Scholar
Tucker, H. J. 1970 The distortion of turbulence by irrotational strain. Mech. Engng Res. Lab., McGill University, Montreal, Rep. no. 70–7.Google Scholar
Tucker, H. J. & Reynolds, A. J. 1968 The distortion of turbulence by irrotational plane strain. J. Fluid Mech. 32, 657–673.Google Scholar
Uberoi, M. S. 1956 Effect of wind-tunnel contraction on free-stream turbulence. J. Aero. Sci. 23, 754–764.Google Scholar