Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T10:41:14.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows. Part 2. Pulsatile flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2007

SONU S. VARGHESE ,
STEVEN H. FRANKEL  and
PAUL F. FISCHER
SONU S. VARGHESE
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
STEVEN H. FRANKEL
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, 585 Purdue Mall, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
PAUL F. FISCHER
Affiliation:
Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct numerical simulations (DNS) of stenotic flows under conditions of steady inlet flow were discussed in Part 1 of this study. DNS of pulsatile flow through the 75% stenosed tube (by area) employed for the computations in Part 1 is examined here. Analogous to the steady flow results, DNS predicts a laminar post-stenotic flow field in the case of pulsatile flow through the axisymmetric stenosis model, in contrast to previous experiments, in which intermittent disturbed flow regions and turbulent breakdown were observed in the downstream region. The introduction of a stenosis eccentricity, that was 5% of the main vessel diameter at the throat, resulted in periodic, localized transition to turbulence. Analysis in this study indicates that the early and mid-acceleration phases of the time period cycle were relatively stable, with no turbulent activity in the post-stenotic region. However, towards the end of acceleration, the starting vortex, formed earlier as the fluid accelerated through the stenosis at the beginning of acceleration, started to break up into elongated streamwise structures. These streamwise vortices broke down at peak flow, forming a turbulent spot in the post-stenotic region. In the early part of deceleration there was intense turbulent activity within this spot. Past the mid-deceleration phase, through to minimum flow, the inlet flow lost its momentum and the flow field began to relaminarize. The start of acceleration in the following cycle saw a recurrence of the entire process of a starting structure undergoing turbulent breakdown and subsequent relaminarization of the post-stenotic flow field. Peak wall shear stress (WSS) levels occurred at the stenosis throat, with the rest of the vessel experiencing much lower levels. Turbulent breakdown at peak flow resulted in a sharp amplification of instantaneous WSS magnitudes across the region corresponding to the turbulent spot, accompanied by large axial and circumferential fluctuations, even while ensemble-averaged axial shear stresses remained mostly low and negative. WSS levels dropped rapidly after the mid-deceleration phase, when the relaminarization process took over, and were almost identical to laminar, axisymmetric shear levels through most of the acceleration phase.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 582 , 10 July 2007 , pp. 281 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S. A. & Giddens, D. P. 1983 Velocity measurements in steady flow through axisymmetric stenoses at moderate Reynolds number. J. Biomech. 16, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, S. A. & Giddens, D. P. 1984 Pulsatile poststenotic flow studies with laser Doppler anemometry. J. Biomech. 17, 695–705.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassanova, R. A. & Giddens, D. P. 1978 Disorder distal to modeled stenoses in steady and pulsatile flow. J. Biomech. 11, 441–453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliahou, S., Tumin, A. & Wygnanski, I. 1998 Laminar-turbulent transition in Poiseuille pipe flow subjected to periodic perturbation emanating from the wall. J. Fluid Mech. 361, 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, P. F., Kruse, G. & Loth, F. 2002 Spectral element methods for transitional flows in complex geometries. J. Sci. Comput. 17, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, G., Tumin, A. & Wygnanski, I. 2000 Laminar-turbulent transition in Poiseuille pipe flow subjected to periodic perturbation emanating from the wall. Part 2. Late stage of transition. J. Fluid Mech. 419, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1975 Turbulence. Mcgraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Jeong, J. & Hussain, F. 1995 On the identification of a vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69–94.Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. M. A. & Giddens, D. P. 1981 Characterization and evolution of post-stenotic flow disturbances. J. Biomech. 14, 279–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B. M. & Corcoran, W. H. 1974 Experimental measurements of turbulence spectra distal to stenoses. J. Biomech. 7, 335–342.Google Scholar
Ku, D. N. 1997 Blood flow in arteries. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 29, 399–434.Google Scholar
Lieber, B. B. & Giddens, D. P. 1988 Apparent stresses in disturbed pulsatile flows. J. Biomech. 21, 287–298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lieber, B. B. & Giddens, D. P. 1990 Post-stenotic core flow behavior in pulsatile flow and its effects on wall shear stress. J. Biomech. 23, 597–605.Google Scholar
Lu, P. C., Gross, D. R. & Hwang, N. H. C. 1980 Intravascular pressure and velocity fluctuations in pulmonic arterial stenosis. J. Biomech. 13, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mittal, R., Simmons, S. P. & Najjar, F. 2003 Numerical study of pulsatile flow in a constricted channel. J. Fluid Mech. 485, 337–378.Google Scholar
Ojha, M., Cobbold, C., Johnston, K. & Hummel, R. 1989 Pulsatile flow through constricted tubes: An experimental investigation using photochromic tracer methods. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 173–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scotti, A. & Piomelli, U. 2001 Numerical simulation of pulsating turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 13, 1367–1384.Google Scholar
Shan, H., Ma, B., Zhang, Z. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1999 Direct numerical simulation of a puff and a slug in transitional cylindrical pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 39–60.Google Scholar
Sherwin, S. J. & Blackburn, H. M. 2005 Three-dimensional instabilities and transition of steady and pulsatile axisymmetric stenotic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 533, 297–327.Google Scholar
Stettler, J. C. & Hussain, A. K. M. F. 1986 On transition of the pulsatile pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 170, 169–197.Google Scholar
Stroud, J., Berger, S. & Saloner, D. 2000 Influence of stenosis morphology on flow through severely stenotic vessels: Implications for plaque rupture. J. Biomech. 33, 443–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Varghese, S. S., Frankel, S. H. & Fischer, P. F. 2007 Direct numerical simulation of stenotic flows. Part 1. Steady flow. J. Fluid Mech. 582, 253–280.Google Scholar
Waleffe, F. 1997 On self-sustaining process in shear flows. Phys. Fluids 9, 883–900.Google Scholar
Welch, P. D. 1967 The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU 15, 70–73.Google Scholar
Wilcox, D. 1993 Turbulence Modeling for CFD. La Cañada, California, CA: DCW Industries.Google Scholar
Womersley, J. R. 1955 Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J. Physiol. 127, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wootton, D. M. & Ku, D. N. 1999 Fluid mechanics of vascular systems, diseases, and thrombosis. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Engng 1, 299–329.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. J. & Champagne, F. H. 1973 On transition in a pipe. Part 1. The origin of puffs and slugs and the flow in a turbulent slug. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 281–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wygnanski, I. J., Sokolov, M. & Friedman, D. 1975 On transition in a pipe. Part 2. The equilibrium puff. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 283–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar