Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T01:22:59.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diffusion of weak magnetic fields by isotropic turbulence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

Robert H. Kraichnan
Affiliation:
Dublin, New Hampshire 03444

Abstract

The diffusion of slowly varying, weak magnetic fields by a statistically isotropic and stationary velocity field in a perfectly conducting fluid is studied by Eulerian analysis. The characteristic wavenumber and variance of the velocity field are k0 and 3v20, thus defining the eddy-circulation time τ0 = 1/v0k0. The velocity field is assumed constant on intervals of duration 2τ1 and statistically independent for distinct intervals. Thus the correlation time is τ1. The α-effect dynamo mechanism in the quasi-linear approximation is corroborated. Both the quasilinear and the direct-interaction approximations give identical diffusion of magnetic and passive scalar fields in reflexionally invariant turbulence. This result is found to be exact for τ10 → 0 but is demonstrated to be incorrect in general for finite τ10 because of effects of helicity fluctuations. The nature of the failure of the direct-interaction approximation is exhibited by an exactly soluble model system. Analysis based on a double-averaging device shows that longrange, persistent helicity fluctuations in reflexionally invariant turbulence give an anomalous negative contribution to the magnetic diffusivity which depends on the helicity covariance function. We term this the α2 effect. The magnitude of the effect depends sensitively on the turbulence statistics. If the characteristic scales of the helicity fluctuations are sufficiently larger than τ0 and 1/k0, the magnetic diffusivity is negative, implying unstable growth, while a passive scalar field diffuses normally. On the other hand, a crude estimate suggests that the α2 effect is small in normally distributed turbulence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1976 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kraichnan, R. H. 1961 J. Math. Phys. 2, 124.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1968 Phys. Fluids, 11, 945.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1970a Phys. Fluids, 13, 22.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1970b J. Fluid Mech. 41, 189.
Kraichnan, R. H. 1973 J. Fluid Mech. 59, 745.
Kraichnan, R. H. & Nagarajan, S. 1967 Phys. Fluids, 10, 859.
Lerche, I. 1973a J. Math. Phys. 14, 1381.
Lerche, I. 1973b J. Math. Phys. 14, 1579.
Lerche, I. 1973c J. Math. Phys. 14, 1588.
Lerche, I. & Parker, E. N. 1973 J. Math. Phys. 14, 1949.
Moffatt, H. K. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 35, 117.
Moffatt, H. K. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 435.
Moffatt, H. K. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 65, 1.
Moffatt, H. K. 1976 Adv. Appl. Mech. 16, (to appear).
Parker, E. N. 1955 Astrophys. J. 122, 293.
Parker, E. N. 1971 Astrophys. J. 163, 279.
Roberts, P. H. 1961 J. Fluid Mech. 11, 257.
Roberts, P. H. 1971 Lectures in Applied Mathematics (ed. W. H. Reid). Providence: American Mathematical Society.
Roberts, P. H. 1975 Magnetnaya Gidrodinamika, no. 2, p. 3.
Roberts, P. H. & Soward, A. M. 1975 Astron. Nachr. 296, 49.
Steenbeck, M. & Krause, F. 1969 Astron. Nachr. 291, 49.
Taylor, G. I. 1921 Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 20, 196.