Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:52:29.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of the bottom deformation from space- and time-resolved water wave measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2017

Pablo J. Cobelli*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and IFIBA, CONICET, Ciudad Universitaria, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes, UMR CNRS 7636, Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, ESPCI-ParisTech, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75231 Paris CEDEX 5, France
Philippe Petitjeans
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hétérogènes, UMR CNRS 7636, Ecole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles, ESPCI-ParisTech, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75231 Paris CEDEX 5, France
Agnès Maurel
Affiliation:
Institut Langevin, UMR CNRS 7587, Paris, France
Vincent Pagneux
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d’Acoustique de l’Université du Maine, UMR CNRS 6613, Avenue Olivier Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans CEDEX 9, France
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper we study both theoretically and experimentally the inverse problem of indirectly measuring the shape of a localized bottom deformation with a non-instantaneous time evolution, from either an instantaneous global state (space-based inversion) or a local time-history record (time-based inversion) of the free-surface evolution. Firstly, the mathematical inversion problem is explicitly defined and uniqueness of its solution is established. We then show that this problem is ill-posed in the sense of Hadamard, rendering its solution unstable. In order to overcome this difficulty, we introduce a regularization scheme as well as a strategy for choosing the optimal value of the associated regularization parameter. We then conduct a series of laboratory experiments in which an axisymmetric three-dimensional bottom deformation of controlled shape and time evolution is imposed on a layer of water of constant depth, initially at rest. The detailed evolution of the air–liquid interface is measured by means of a free-surface profilometry technique providing space- and time-resolved data. Based on these experimental data and employing our regularization scheme, we are able to show that it is indeed possible to reconstruct the seabed profile responsible for the linear free-surface dynamics either by space- or time-based inversions. Furthermore, we discuss the different relative advantages of each type of reconstruction, their associated errors and the limitations of the inverse determination.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, Applied Mathematics Series. Dover.Google Scholar
Arfken, G. 1985 Inverse Laplace Transformation, Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Braddock, R. D., Driessche, Van Den, P. & Peady, G. W. 1973 Tsunami generation. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 817828.Google Scholar
Calvetti, D., Morigi, S., Reichel, L. & Sgallari, F. 2000 Tikhonov regularization and the L-curve for large discrete ill-posed problems. J. Comput. Appl. Maths 123 (1–2), 423446.Google Scholar
Cobelli, P. J., Maurel, A., Pagneux, V. & Petitjeans, P. 2009a Global measurement of water waves by Fourier transform profilometry. Exp. Fluids 46, 10371047.Google Scholar
Cobelli, P. J., Pagneux, V., Maurel, A. & Petitjeans, P. 2009b Experimental observation of trapped modes in a water wave channel. Europhys. Lett. 88, 20006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobelli, P. J., Pagneux, V., Maurel, A. & Petitjeans, P. 2011a Experimental study on water-wave trapped modes. J. Fluid Mech. 666, 445476.Google Scholar
Cobelli, P., Przadka, A., Petitjeans, P., Lagubeau, G., Pagneux, V. & Maurel, A. 2011b Different regimes for water wave turbulence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 214503.Google Scholar
Conway, J. B. 1999 A Course in Operator Theory. American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Dutykh, D. & Dias, F. 2007 Water waves generated by a moving bottom. In Tsunami and Nonlinear Waves (ed. Kundu, A.), pp. 6595. Springer.Google Scholar
Eldén, L. 1977 Algorithms for the regularization of ill-conditioned least squares problems. BIT Numer. Maths 17 (2), 134145.Google Scholar
Engl, H. W., Hanke, M. & Neubauer, A. 2000 Regularization of Inverse Problems, Mathematics and Its Applications. Springer.Google Scholar
Golub, G. H., Heath, M. & Wahba, G. 1979 Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21 (2), 215223.Google Scholar
Groetsch, C. W. 1984 The Theory of Tikhonov Regularization for Fredholm Equations of the First Kind, Pitman Adv. Publ. Program. Research Notes in Mathematics Series. Pitman.Google Scholar
Hadamard, J. 2003 Lectures on Cauchy’s Problem in Linear Partial Differential Equations, Dover Phoenix Editions. Dover.Google Scholar
Hammack, J. L. 1973 A note on tsunamis: their generation and propagation in an ocean of uniform depth. J. Fluid Mech. 60, 769799.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. C. 1992 Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve. SIAM Rev. 34 (4), 561580.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. C. 2010 Discrete Inverse Problems: Insight and Algorithms, Fundamentals of Algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. C., Jensen, T. K. & Rodriguez, G. 2007 An adaptive pruning algorithm for the discrete L-curve criterion. J. Comput. Appl. Maths 198 (2), 483492.Google Scholar
Hansen, P. C. & O’Leary, D. P. 1993 The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14, 14871503.Google Scholar
Jang, T. S. 2013 A method for simultaneous identification of the full nonlinear damping and the phase shift and amplitude of the external harmonic excitation in a forced nonlinear oscillator. Comput. Struct. 120, 7785.Google Scholar
Jang, T. S. & Han, S. L. 2008 Application of Tikhonov’s regularization to unstable water waves of the two-dimensional fluid flow: spectrum with compact support. Ships Offshore Struct. 3 (1), 4147.Google Scholar
Jang, T. S., Han, S. L. & Kinoshita, T. 2010 An inverse measurement of the sudden underwater movement of the sea-floor by using the time-history record of the water-wave elevation. Wave Motion 47, 146155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, T. S., Sung, H. G. & Park, J. 2012 A determination of an abrupt motion of the sea bottom by using snapshot data of water waves. Math. Prob. Engng 2012 (4), 472575.Google Scholar
Kajiura, K. 1963 The leading wave of tsunami. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 41, 535571.Google Scholar
Keller, J. B. 1961 Tsunamis: water waves produced by earthquakes. In Proceedings of Tsunami Hydrodynamics Conference, vol. 24, pp. 154166. Institute of Geophysics, University of Hawaii.Google Scholar
Kirsch, A. 2011 An Introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Inverse Problems, Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer.Google Scholar
Lagubeau, G., Fontelos, M. A., Josserand, C., Maurel, A., Pagneux, V. & Petitjeans, P. 2010 Flower patterns in drop impact on thin liquid films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (18), 184503.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, C. L. & Hanson, R. J. 1995 Solving Linear Least Squares Problems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Le Goff, A., Cobelli, P. & Lagubeau, G. 2013 Supershear Rayleigh waves at a soft interface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 236101.Google Scholar
Maurel, A., Cobelli, P. J., Pagneux, V. & Petitjeans, P. 2009 Experimental and theoretical inspection of the phase-to-height relation in Fourier transform profilometry. Appl. Opt. 48 (2), 380392.Google Scholar
Mei, C. C., Stiassnie, M. & Yue, D. K. P. 2005 Theory and Applications of Ocean Surface Waves: Linear Aspects, Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering. World Scientific.Google Scholar
Murty, T. S., Aswathanarayana, U. & Nirupama, N. 2007 The Indian Ocean Tsunami. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Przadka, A., Cabane, B., Pagneux, V., Maurel, A. & Petitjeans, P. 2012 Fourier transform profilometry for water waves: how to achieve clean water attenuation with diffusive reflection at the water surface? Exp. Fluids 52 (2), 519527.Google Scholar
Shannon, C. E. 1949 Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. IRE 37 (1), 1021.Google Scholar
Sneddon, I. N. 1951 Fourier Transforms, International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Taubin, G. 1991 Estimation of planar curves, surfaces and nonplanar space curves defined by implicit equations, with applications to edge and range image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 13, 11151138.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, A. N. 1943 On the stability of inverse problems. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 35, 195198.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, A. N. 1963 Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method. Sov. Maths 4, 10351038.Google Scholar
Tikhonov, A. N. & Arsenin, V. I. A. 1977 Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, Scripta Series in Mathematics. Winston.Google Scholar
Tricomi, F. G. 1985 Integral Equations, Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 5. Dover.Google Scholar
Vaughn, M. T. 2007 Introduction to Mathematical Physics, Physics Textbook. Wiley.Google Scholar
Wazwaz, A. M. 2011 Linear and Nonlinear Integral Equations: Methods and Applications. Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Yosida, K. 1995 Functional Analysis, Classics in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar