Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:01:57.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The current emitted by highly conducting Taylor cones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

J. Fernández De La Mora  and
I. G. Loscertales
J. Fernández De La Mora
Affiliation:
Yale University, Mechanical Engineering Department, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
I. G. Loscertales
Affiliation:
Yale University, Mechanical Engineering Department, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When a liquid meniscus held at the exit of a metallic capillary tube is charged to a high voltage V, the free surface often takes the form of a cone whose apex emits a steady microjet, and thus injects a certain charge I and liquid volume Q per unit time into the surrounding gas. This work deals with liquids with relatively large conductivities K, for which the jet diameter dj is much smaller than the diameter dn of the capillary tube. In the limit dj/dn → 0, the structure of the jet (dj and I, in particular) becomes independent of electrostatic parameters such as V or the electrode configuration, being governed mostly by the liquid properties and flow rate Q. Furthermore, the measured current is given approximately by I = f(ε) (γQK/ε)½ for a wide variety of liquids and conditions (ε, and γ are, respectively, the dielectric constant of the liquid and the coefficient of interfacial tension; f(ε) is shown in figure 11). The following explanation is proposed for this behaviour. Convection associated with the liquid flow Q transports the net surface charge towards the cone tip. This upsets the electrostatic surface charge distribution slightly at distances r from the apex large compared to a certain charge relaxation length λ, but substantially when r ∼ λ. When the fluid motion is modelled as a sink flow, λ is of the order of r* = (Qεε0/K)$\frac13$ (ε0 is the electrical permittivity of vacuum). If, in addition, the surface charge density is described through Taylor's theory, the corresponding surface current convected towards the apex scales as Is ∼ (γQK/ε)½, as observed for the spray current. The sink flow hypothesis is shown to be realistic for sufficiently small jet Reynolds numbers. In a few photographs of ethylene glycol cone jets, we find the rough scaling dj ∼ 0.4r* for the jet diameter, which shows that the jet forms as soon as charge relaxation effects set in. In the limit ε [Gt ] 1, an upper bound is found for the convected current at the virtual cone apex, which accounts for only one-quarter of the total measured spray current. The rest of the charge must accordingly reach the head of the jet by conduction through the bulk.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 260 , 10 February 1994 , pp. 155 - 184
Copyright
© 1994 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akhadov, Y. Y. 1981 Dielectric Properties of Binary Solutions. A Data Handbook. Pergamon.
Bailey, A. G. 1988 Electrostatic Spraying of Liquids. Wiley.
Benasayag, G. & Sudraud, P. 1985 In situ high voltage TEM observations of an EHD source. Ultramicroscopy 16, 1–8.Google Scholar
Cloupeau, M. & Prunet-Foch, B. 1989 Electrostatic spraying of liquids in cone-jet mode. J. Electrostat. 22, 135–159.Google Scholar
Cloupeau, M. & Prunet-Foch, B. 1990 Electrostatic spraying of liquids: main functioning mode. J. Electrostat. 25, 165–184.Google Scholar
Fenn, J. B., Mann, M., Meng, C. K., Wong, S. K. & Whitehouse, C. 1989 Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. Science 246, 64–71.Google Scholar
Fernändez de la Mora, J. 1992 The effect of charge emission from electrified liquid cones. J. Fluid Mech. 243, 561–574.Google Scholar
Fernändez de la Mora, J., & Gomez, A. 1993 Remarks on the article ‘Generation of micron-sized droplets from the Taylor cone’. J. Aerosol Sci. 24, 691–695.Google Scholar
Fernändez de la Mora, J., Navascuéas, J., Fernáandez, F. & Rosell-Llompart, J. 1990 Generation of submicron monodisperse aerosols in electrosprays. J. Aerosol Sci. 21, special issue, S673–S676.Google Scholar
Gabovich, M. D. 1984 Liquid-metal emitters. Sov. Phys. Usp 26, 447–455.Google Scholar
Gomez, A., & Tang, K. 1991a Characterization of low flow rate high charge density electrosprays. In Proc. Fifth Intl Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, ICLASS-91 (ed. H. Semerjian) NTIS Special Publication 813, pp. 771–778.
Gomez, A., & Tang, K. 1991b Atomization and dispersion of quasimonodisperse electrostatic sprays systems. In Proc. Fifth Intl Conf. on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ed. H. Semerjian) NTIS Special Publication 813, pp. 805–812.
Gomez, A. & Tang, K. 1993 Charged droplet fission in electrostatic sprays. Phys. Fluids (to appear).Google Scholar
Hayati, I., Bailey, A. I. & Tadros, Th. F. 1986 Mechanism of stable jet formation in electrohydrodynamic atomization. Nature 319, 41–43.Google Scholar
Hayati, I., Bailey, A. I. & Tadros, Th. F. 1987a Investigations into the mechanism of electrohydrodynamic spraying of liquids, I. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 117, 205–221.Google Scholar
Hayati, I., Bailey, A. I. & Tadros, Th. F. 1987b Investigations into the mechanism of electrohydrodynamic spraying of liquids, II. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 117, 222–230.Google Scholar
Jones, A. R. & Thong, K. C. 1971 The production of charged monodisperse fuel droplets by electrostatic dispersion., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 4, 1159.Google Scholar
Kidd, P. W. 1968 Parametric studies with a single-needle colloidal thruster. J. Spacecraft 5, 1034–1039.Google Scholar
Moore, W. J. 1972 Physical Chemistry. Prentice Hall.
Pfeifer, R. J. & Hendricks, C. D. 1968 Parametric studies of electrohydrodynamic spraying. AIAA J. 6, 496–502.Google Scholar
Riddick, J. A., Bunger, W. B. & Sakano, T. 1986 Organic solvents: Physical Properties and Method of Purification, 3rd edn. Wiley-Interscience.
Rosell-Llompart, J. & Fernändez df la Mora, J. 1994 Generation of monodisperse droplets 0.3 to 4 μm in diameter from electrified cone jets. J. Aerosol Sci. (submitted).Google Scholar
Smith, D. P. H. 1986 The electrohydrodynamic atomization of liquids. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applics IA-22, 527–535.Google Scholar
Smith, R. D., Loo, J. A., Ogorzalek, R. R., Busman, M. & Usdeth, H. R. 1991 Principles and practice of electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for large polypeptides and proteins. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 10, 359–451.Google Scholar
Tang, L. & Kebarle, P. 1991 Effect of the conductivity of the electrosprayed solution on the electrospray current. Factors determining analyte sensitivity in electrospray mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 63, 2709–2715.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1964 Disintegration of water drops in an electric field. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 280, 383–397.Google Scholar
(See also The Complete Works of G. I. Taylor (ed. G. K. Batchelor), Vol. IV; Nos. 9. 39, 40, 41, 42, and 47, Cambridge University Press.)
Weast, R. C. (ed.) 1985 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 65th edn. Chemical Rubber Company.
Zeleny, J. 1914 The electrical discharge from liquid points and a hydrostatic method of measuring the electric intensity at their surface. Phys. Rev. 3, 69–91.Google Scholar
Zeleny, J. 1915 On the conditions of instability of liquid drops, with applications to the electrical discharge from liquid points. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 18, 71–93.Google Scholar
Zeleny, J. 1917 Instability of electrified liquid surfaces. Phys. Rev. 10, 1–6.Google Scholar