Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T21:00:29.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Crackle’: an annoying component of jet noise

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

J. E. Ffowcs Williams ,
J. Simson  and
V. J. Virchis
J. E. Ffowcs Williams
Affiliation:
Engineering Department, University of Cambridge
J. Simson
Affiliation:
Rolls-Royce (1971) Ltd, Bristol Engine Divison, England
V. J. Virchis
Affiliation:
Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper describes an investigation of a subjectively distinguishable element of high speed jet noise known as ‘crackle’. ‘Crackle’ cannot be characterized by the normal spectral description of noise. It is shown to be due to intense spasmodic short-duration compressive elements of the wave form. These elements have low energy spread over a wide frequency range. The crackling of a large jet engine is caused by groups of sharp compressions in association with gradual expansions. The groups occur at random and persist for some 10−1s, each group containing about 10 compressions, typically of strength 5 × 10−3 atmos at a distance of 50 m. The skewness of the amplitude probability distribution of the recorded sound quantifies crackle, though the recording process probably changes the skewness level. Skewness values in excess of unity have been measured; noises with skewness less than 0·3 seem to be crackle free. Crackle is uninfluenced by the jet scale, but varies strongly with jet velocity and angular position. The jet temperature does not affect crackle, neither does combustion. Supersonic jets crackle strongly whether or not they are ideally expanded through convergent-divergent nozzles. Crackle is formed (we think) because of local shock formation due to nonlinear wave steepening at the source and not from long-term nonlinear propagation. Such long-term effects are important in flight, where they are additive. Some jet noise suppressors inhibit crackle.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 71 , Issue 2 , 23 September 1975 , pp. 251 - 271
Copyright
© 1975 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1974a Impulsive sources of aerodynamic sound. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 131, paper 1.
Ffowcs Williams, J. E. 1974b Nonlinear generation of secondary waves in fluids. Proc. Copenhagen Symp. on Finite Amplitude Effects in Fluids. Guildford, England: I.P.C. Science and Technology Press.
Hoch, R. & Hawkins, R. 1974 Recent studies into Concorde noise reduction. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 131. paper 19.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On sound generated aerodynamically. I. General theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 221, 564–587.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Viscosity effects in sound waves of finite amplitude. In Surveys in Mechanics (ed. G. K. Batchelor & R. M. Davies), pp. 250–351. Cambridge University Press.
Meecham, W. C. & Hurdle, P. M. 1974 Use of cross-correlation measurements to investigate noise generating regions of a real jet engine and a model jet. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 131. paper 8.Google Scholar
Obermeier, F. 1974 Sonic boom behaviour near a caustic. AGARD Conf. Proc. no. 131. paper 17.Google Scholar
Pestorius, F. M. & Blackstock, D. T. 1974 Propagation of finite amplitude noise. Proc. Copenhagen Symp. on Finite Amplitude Effects in Fluids. Guildford, England: I.P.C. Science and Technology Press.