Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T03:10:24.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Convection in an imposed magnetic field. Part 2. The dynamical regime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

N. O. Weiss
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge

Abstract

Nonlinear, two-dimensional magnetoconvection has been investigated numerically for a fixed Rayleigh number of 104, with the ratio ζ of the magnetic to the thermal diffusivity in the range 0·4 ≥ ζ ≥ 0·05. As the Chandrasekhar number Q is decreased, convection first sets in as overstable oscillations, which are succeeded by steady convection with dynamically active flux sheets and, eventually, with kinematically concentrated fields. In the dynamical regime spatially asymmetrical convection, with most of the flux on one side of the cell, is preferred. As Q increases, these asymmetrical solutions become time-dependent, with oscillations about the steady state which develop into large-scale oscillations with reversals of the flow. Although linear theory predicts that narrow cells should be most unstable, the nonlinear results show that steady convection occurs most easily in cells that are roughly twice as wide as they are deep.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1981 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cowling, T. G. 1976 Magnetohydrodynamics. Bristol: Hilger.
Fromm, J. E. 1965 Numerical solutions of the nonlinear equations for a heated fluid layer. Phys. Fluids 8, 17571769.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. J. 1978 The origin of running penumbral waves. Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 184, 49P52P.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. J. & Moore, D. R. 1979 Axisymmetric convection in the presence of a magnetic field. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dyn. 12, 73106.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. J., Proctor, M. R. E. & Weiss, N. O. 1978 Magnetic flux ropes and convection. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 243261.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. J. & Weiss, N. O. 1981 Convection and magnetic fields in stars. Astrophys. J. 243, 945953.Google Scholar
Golub, L., Rosner, R., Vaiana, G. S. & Weiss, N. O. 1981 Solar magnetic fields: the generation of emerging flux. Astrophys. J. 243, 309316.Google Scholar
Harvey, J. W. 1977 Observations of small-scale magnetic fields. Highlights of Astronomy 4, part II, 223239.Google Scholar
Knobloch, E. & Proctor, M. R. E. 1981 Nonlinear periodic convection in double-diffusive systems. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 291316.Google Scholar
Knobloch, E., Weiss, N. O. & Da costa, L. N. 1981 Oscillatory and steady convection in a magnetic field. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).Google Scholar
Moore, D. R. & Weiss, N. O. 1973 Two-dimensional Rayleigh-Bénard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 58, 289312.Google Scholar
Orszag, S. A. & Tang, C.-M. 1979 Small-scale structure of two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 90, 129143.Google Scholar
Peckover, R. S. & Weiss, N. O. 1978 On the dynamic interaction between magnetic fields and convection. Mon. Not. Roy. Astr. Soc. 182, 189208.Google Scholar
Proctor, M. R. E. & Weiss, N. O. 1978 Magnetic flux ropes. Rotating Fluids in Geophysics (ed. P. H. Roberts and A. M. Soward), pp. 389408. Academic.
Stenflo, J. O. 1977 Influence of magnetic fields on solar hydrodynamics: experimental results. I.A.U. Colloquium no. 36 (ed. R. M. Bonnet & P. Delache), pp. 143188. Clermont-Ferrand: de Bussac.
Veronis, G. 1966 Large-amplitude Bénard convection. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 4968.Google Scholar
Weiss, N. O. 1981a Convection in an imposed magnetic field. Part 1. The development of nonlinear convection. J. Fluid Mech. 108, 247272.Google Scholar
Weiss, N. O. 1981b The interplay between magnetic fields and convection. J. Geophys. Res. (submitted).Google Scholar