Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:52:10.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contributions of different scales of turbulent motions to the mean wall-shear stress in open channel flows at low-to-moderate Reynolds numbers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2021

Yanchong Duan Open the ORCID record for Yanchong Duan [Opens in a new window] ,
Qiang Zhong Open the ORCID record for Qiang Zhong [Opens in a new window] ,
Guiquan Wang Open the ORCID record for Guiquan Wang [Opens in a new window] ,
Peng Zhang  and
Danxun Li
Yanchong Duan
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
Qiang Zhong*
Affiliation:
College of Water Resources and Civil Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing100083, PR China Beijing Engineering Research Center of Safety and Energy Saving Technology for Water Supply Network System, China Agricultural University, Beijing100083, PR China
Guiquan Wang
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group and Twente Max Planck Center, Department of Science and Technology, Mesa+ Institute, and J.M. Burgers Center for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, Enschede7500 AE, The Netherlands
Peng Zhang
Affiliation:
National Engineering Research Center for Inland Waterway Regulation, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing400074, PR China
Danxun Li
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing100084, PR China
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Smooth-walled open channel flow datasets, covering both the direct numerical simulation and experimental measurements with a friction Reynolds number ${\textit {Re}}_\tau$ at a low-to-moderate level of $550\sim 2400$, are adopted to investigate the contributions of different scale motions to the mean wall-shear stress in open channel flows (OCFs). The FIK identity decomposition method by Fukagata et al. (Phys. Fluids, vol. 14, 2002, L73) combined with a scale decomposition is chosen for this research. To see whether/how the contributions in OCFs differ with those in closed channel flows (CCFs), comparisons between the two flows are also made. The scale-decomposed ‘turbulent’ contribution results of present OCFs exhibit two dominant contribution modes (i.e. large-scale motions (LSMs) and very-large-scale motions (VLSMs)) at a streamwise wavelength $\lambda _x=1\sim 2h$ and $O(10h)$, where $h$ is the water depth. The large scales with $\lambda _x>3h$ and $\lambda _x>10h$ are demonstrated to contribute to over 40 % and 20 % of the mean wall-shear stress, respectively. Compared with CCFs, slightly higher and lower contributions in the $\lambda _x>O(10h)$ and $\lambda _x < O(10h)$ wavelength ranges are observed in OCFs, revealing the important free-surface effects in OCFs. Possible mechanisms are discussed to lend support for the observed differences between the two flows.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Waves/Free-surface Flows: Channel flow
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 918 , 10 July 2021 , A40
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adrian, R.J. & Marusic, I. 2012 Coherent structures in flow over hydraulic engineering surfaces. J. Hydraul Res. 50 (5), 451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostini, L. & Leschziner, M. 2019 The connection between the spectrum of turbulent scales and the skin-friction statistics in channel flow at $Re_\tau \approx 1000$. J. Fluid Mech. 871, 22–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J.C. & Jiménez, J. 2009 Estimation of turbulent convection velocities and corrections to Taylor's approximation. J. Fluid Mech. 640, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, W.J., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2016 Spectral stochastic estimation of high-Reynolds-number wall-bounded turbulence for a refined inner-outer interaction model. Phys. Rev. Fluids 1, 054406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baars, W.J., Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2017 Self-similarity of wall-attached turbulence in boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 823, R2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baidya, R., Philip, J., Hutchins, N., Monty, J.P. & Marusic, I. 2017 Distance-from-the-wall scaling of turbulent motions in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 29, 020712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balakumar, B.J. 2005 Nature of turbulence in wall-bounded flows. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
Balakumar, B.J. & Adrian, R.J. 2007 Large- and very-large-scale motions in channel and boundary-layer flows. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 665–681.Google ScholarPubMed
Bannier, A., Garnier, É. & Sagaut, P. 2015 Riblet flow model based on an extended FIK identity. Flow Turbul. Combust. 95, 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, C. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent open channel flow. Master's thesis, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Buxton, O.R.H., de Kat, R. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2013 The convection of large and intermediate scale fluctuations in a turbulent mixing layer. Phys. Fluids 25, 125105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, S.M., Nikora, V.I. & Stewart, M.T. 2017 Very-large-scale motions in rough-bed open-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 814, 416–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, C., Li, W.P., Lozano-Durán, A. & Liu, H. 2019 Identity of attached eddies in turbulent channel flows with bidimensional empirical mode decomposition. J. Fluid Mech. 870, 1037–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cierpka, C., Rossi, M. & Köhler, C.J. 2015 Wall shear stress measurements. In Encyclopedia of Microfluidics and Nanofluidics, 2nd edn (ed. D.Q. Li), pp. 3479–3486. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deck, S., Renard, N., Laraufie, R. & Weiss, P. 2014 Large-scale contribution to mean wall shear stress in high-Reynolds-number flat-plate boundary layers up to $Re_\theta =13 650$. J. Fluid Mech. 743, 202–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpande, R., Monty, J.P. & Marusic, I. 2020 A scheme to correct the influence of calibration misalignment for cross-wire probes in turbulent shear flows. Exp. Fluids 61, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, Y.C., Chen, Q.G., Li, D.X. & Zhong, Q. 2020 a Contributions of very large-scale motions to turbulence statistics in open channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 892, A3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, Y.C., Zhang, P., Zhong, Q., Zhu, D.J. & Li, D.X. 2020 b Characteristics of wall-attached motions in open channel flows. Phys. Fluids 32, 055110.Google Scholar
Fan, Y.T., Cheng, C. & Li, W.P. 2019 a Effects of the Reynolds number on the mean skin friction decomposition in turbulent channel flows. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 40 (3), 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y.T., Li, W.P. & Pirozzoli, S. 2019 b Decomposition of the mean friction drag in zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 31, 086105.Google Scholar
Fiscaletti, D., de Kat, R. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2018 Spatial-spectral characteristics of momentum transport in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 836, 599–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukagata, K., Iwamoto, K. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 14 (11), L73–L76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gad-el-Hak, M. 1994 Interactive control of turbulent boundary layers: a futuristic overview. AIAA J. 32 (9), 1753–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Giovanetti, M., Hwang, Y. & Choi, H. 2016 Skin-friction generation by attached eddies in turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 808, 511–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, T., Flutet, V. & Sagaut, P. 2009 Contribution of Reynolds stress distribution to the skin friction in compressible turbulent channel flows. Phys. Rev. E 79, 035301(R).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guala, M., Hommema, S.E. & Adrian, R.J. 2006 Large-scale and very-large-scale motions in turbulent pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haritonidis, J.H. 1989 The measurement of wall shear stress. In Advances in Fluid Mechanics Measurements (ed. M. Gad-el-Hak), chap. 6, pp. 229–261. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, R.F., Yang, X.I.A. & Zheng, X.J. 2020 Wall-attached and wall-detached eddies in wall-bounded turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 885, A30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, J. & Sung, H.J. 2017 Influence of large-scale motions on the frictional drag in a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 829, 751–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwamoto, K., Fukagata, K., Kasagi, N. & Suzuki, Y. 2005 Friction drag reduction achievable by near-wall turbulence manipulation at high Reynolds numbers. Phys. Fluids 17, 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kametani, Y. & Fukagata, K. 2011 Direct numerical simulation of spatially developing turbulent boundary layers with uniform blowing or suction. J. Fluid Mech. 681, 154–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kametani, Y., Fukagata, K., Örlü, R. & Schlatter, P. 2015 Effect of uniform blowing/suction in a turbulent boundary layer at moderate Reynolds number. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 55, 132–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kat, R. & Ganapathisubramani, B. 2015 Frequency-wavenumber mapping in turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 783, 166–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Hwang, J., Yoon, M., Ahn, J. & Sung, H.J. 2017 Influence of a large-eddy breakup device on the frictional drag in a turbulent boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 29, 065103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K.C. & Adrian, R.J. 1999 Very large-scale motion in the outer layer. Phys. Fluids 11 (2), 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klewicki, J.C., Saric, W.S., Marusic, I. & Eaton, J.K. 2007 Wall-bounded flows. In Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics (ed. C. Tropea, A.L. Yarin & J.F. Foss), chap. 12, pp. 871–907. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komori, S., Nagaosa, R., Murakami, Y., Chiba, S., Ishii, K. & Kuwahara, K. 1993 Direct numerical simulation of three-dimensional open-channel flow with zero-shear gas-liquid interface. Phys. Fluids 5 (1), 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuwata, Y. & Kawaguchi, Y. 2018 Statistical discussions on skin frictional drag of turbulence over randomly distributed semi-spheres. Intl J. Adv. Engng Sci. Appl. Maths 10 (4), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. & Moser, R.D. 2015 Direct numerical simulation of turbulent channel flow up to $Re_\tau \approx 5200$. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. & Moser, R.D. 2019 Spectral analysis of the budget equation in turbulent channel flows at high Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 860, 886–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W.P., Fan, Y.T., Modesti, D. & Cheng, C. 2019 Decomposition of the mean skin-friction drag in compressible turbulent channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 875, 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lozano-Durán, A. & Jiménez, J. 2014 Effect of the computational domain on direct simulations of turbulent channels up to $Re_{\tau } = 4200$. Phys. Fluids 26, 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marusic, I. & Monty, J.P. 2019 Attached eddy model of wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 51, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, F., Johansson, T.G., White, C.M. & Naughton, J.W. 2014 On determining wall shear stress in spatially developing two-dimensional wall-bounded flows. Exp. Fluids 55, 1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, F. & White, C.M. 2011 Integral form of the skin friction coefficient suitable for experimental data. Exp. Fluids 50, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modesti, D., Pirozzoli, S., Orlandi, P. & Grasso, F. 2018 On the role of secondary motions in turbulent square duct flow. J. Fluid Mech. 847, R1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monty, J.P., Hutchins, N., Ng, H.C.H., Marusic, I. & Chong, M.S. 2009 A comparison of turbulent pipe, channel and boundary layer flows. J. Fluid Mech. 632, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. 2005 Open-channel flow turbulence and its research prospect in the 21st century. J. Hydraul. Engng 131 (4), 229–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nezu, I. & Nakagawa, H. 1993 Turbulence in Open-Channel Flows. Balkema.Google Scholar
Nezu, I. & Rodi, W. 1986 Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. J. Hydraul. Engng 112 (5), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikora, V.I., Stoesser, T., Cameron, S.M., Stewart, M., Papadopoulos, K., Ouro, P., McSherry, R., Zampiron, A., Marusic, I. & Falconer, R.A. 2019 Friction factor decomposition for rough-wall flows: theoretical background and application to open-channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 872, 626–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peet, Y. & Sagaut, P. 2009 Theoretical prediction of turbulent skin friction on geometrically complex surfaces. Phys. Fluids 21, 105105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peruzzi, C., Poggi, D., Ridolfi, L. & Manes, C. 2020 On the scaling of large-scale structures in smooth-bed turbulent open-channel flows. J. Fluid Mech. 889, A1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rathakrishnan, E. 2017 Measurement of wall shear stress. In Instrumentation, Measurements, and Experiments in Fluids, 2nd edn (ed. E. Rathakrishnan), chap. 10, pp. 471–479. CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2015 On the scale-dependent turbulent convection velocity in a spatially developing flat plate turbulent boundary layer at Reynolds number $Re_\theta =13\,000$. J. Fluid Mech. 775, 105–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2016 A theoretical decomposition of mean skin friction generation into physical phenomena across the boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 339–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renard, N. & Deck, S. 2017 Towards a physical scale decomposition of mean skin friction generation in the turbulent boundary layer. In Progress in Turbulence VII (ed. R. Örlü, A. Talamelli, M. Oberlack & J. Peinke), pp. 59–65. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarano, F. 2002 Iterative image deformation methods in PIV. Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, R1–R19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sciacchitano, A. & Wieneke, B. 2016 PIV uncertainty propagation. Meas. Sci. Technol. 27, 084006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senthil, S., Kitsios, V., Sekimoto, A., Atkinson, C. & Soria, J. 2020 Analysis of the factors contributing to the skin friction coefficient in adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers and their variation with the pressure gradient. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 82, 108531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, D.T., Hutchins, N., Morrill-Winter, C., Schultz, M.P., Klewicki, J.C. & Marusic, I. 2017 Applicability of Taylor's hypothesis in rough- and smooth-wall boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 812, 398–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroh, A., Frohnapfel, B., Schlatter, P. & Hasegawa, Y. 2015 A comparison of opposition control in turbulent boundary layer and turbulent channel flow. Phys. Fluids 27, 075101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend, A.A. 1976 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vinuesa, R. & Örlü, R. 2017 Measurement of wall-shear stress. In Experimental Aerodynamics, 1st edn (ed. S. Discetti & A. Ianiro), chap. 12, pp. 393–428. CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J.M. 2014 The application of wall similarity techniques to determine wall shear velocity in smooth and rough wall turbulent boundary layers. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 136, 051204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, G. & Richter, D.H. 2019 Two mechanisms of modulation of very-large-scale motions by inertial particles in open channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 868, 538–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, K.G. 1979 An outline of the techniques available for the measurement of skin friction in turbulent boundary layers. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 18, 1–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, M., Ahn, J., Hwang, J. & Sung, H.J. 2016 Contribution of velocity-vorticity correlations to the frictional drag in wall-bounded turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 28, 081702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, M., Hwang, J. & Sung, H.J. 2018 Contribution of large-scale motions to the skin friction in a moderate adverse pressure gradient turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 848, 288–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, W.H., Zhang, H.N., Li, J.F., Yu, B. & Li, F.C. 2020 Comparison of turbulent drag reduction mechanisms of viscoelastic fluids based on the Fukagata–Iwamoto–Kasagi identity and the Renard–Deck identity. Phys. Fluids 32, 013104.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Song, X.D., Ye, S.R., Wang, Y.W., Huang, C.G., An, Y.R. & Chen, Y.S. 2019 Application of deep learning method to Reynolds stress models of channel flow based on reduced-order modeling of DNS data. J. Hydrodyn. 31 (1), 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Q., Chen, Q.G., Wang, H., Li, D.X. & Wang, X.K. 2016 Statistical analysis of turbulent super-streamwise vortices based on observations of streaky structures near the free surface in the smooth open channel flow. Water Resour. Res. 52 (5), 3563–3578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, Q., Li, D.X., Chen, Q.G. & Wang, X.K. 2015 Coherent structures and their interactions in smooth open channel flows. Environ. Fluid Mech. 15, 653–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar