Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:51:27.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contact in a viscous fluid. Part 2. A compressible fluid and an elastic solid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2010

N. J. BALMFORTH*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1984 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada Department of Earth and Ocean Science, University of British Columbia, 6339 Stores Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
C. J. CAWTHORN
Affiliation:
DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
R. V. CRASTER
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G1, Canada
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

A lubrication theory is presented for the effect of fluid compressibility and solid elasticity on the descent of a two-dimensional smooth object falling under gravity towards a plane wall through a viscous fluid. The final approach to contact, which takes infinite time in the absence of both effects, is determined by numerical and asymptotic methods. Compressibility can lead to contact in finite time either during inertially generated oscillations or if the viscosity decreases sufficiently quickly with increasing pressure. The approach to contact is invariably slowed by allowing the solids to deform elastically; specific results are presented for an underlying elastic wall modelled as a foundation, half-space, membrane or beam.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnocky, G. & Davis, R. H. 1988 Elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of spheres: experimental verification. Phys. Fluids 31, 13241329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnocky, G. & Davis, R. H. 1989 The influence of pressure-dependent density and viscosity on the elastohydrodynamic collision and rebound of two spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 209, 501519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barus, H. 1973 Inlet shear heating in elastohydrodynamic lubrication. ASME J. Lubr. Technol. 95, 417426.Google Scholar
Cawthorn, C. J. & Balmforth, N. J. 2010 Contact in a viscous fluid. Part 1. A falling wedge. J. Fluid Mech. 646, 327338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, P. S. Y. & Cameron, A. 1962 Pressure viscosity characteristics of lubricating oils. J. Inst. Petrol. 48, 147155.Google Scholar
Davis, R. H., Serayssol, J.-M. & Hinch, E. J. 1986 The elastohydrodynamic collision of two spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 163, 479497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowson, D. & Jin, Z. M. 1992 Microelastohydrodynamic lubrication of low-elastic-modulus solids on rigid substrates. J. Phys D 25, A116A123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowson, D., Ruddy, B. L. & Economou, P. N. 1983 The elastohydrodynamic lubrication of piston rings. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 386, 409430.Google Scholar
Gopinath, A., Chen, S. B. & Koch, D. L. 1997 Lubrication flows between spherical particles colliding in a compressible non-continuum gas. J. Fluid Mech. 344, 245269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gopinath, A. & Koch, D. L. 2002 Collision and rebound of small droplets in an incompressible continuum gas. J. Fluid Mech. 454, 145201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griggs, A. J., Zinchenko, A. Z. & Davis, R. H. 2008 Gravity-driven motion of a drop or bubble near an inclined plane at low Reynolds number. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 34, 408418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocking, L. M. 1973 The effect of slip on the motion of a sphere close to a wall and of two adjacent spheres. J. Engng Math 7, 207221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huppert, H. E. 1982 Flow and instability of a viscous current down a slope. Nature 300, 427429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiao, Y., Gorb, S. & Scherge, M. 2000 Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (orthoptera, insecta). J. Exp. Biol. 203, 18871895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, A. F. & Wilson, S. D. R. 1978 The film drainage problem in droplet coalescence. J. Fluid Mech. 87, 263288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muskhelishvili, N. I. 1963 Some Basic Problems of the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. (trans. Radok, J. R. M.). P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. R. A. 1960 The instability of uniform viscous flow under rollers and spreaders. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 481500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petzold, L. R. 1983 A description of DASSL – a differential algebraic solver. In Scientific Computing (ed. Stepleman, R. S.), pp. 6568. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Pinkus, O. & Sternlicht, B. 1961 Theory of Hydrodynamic Lubrication. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. & Taylor, G. I. 1958 The penetration of a fluid into a porous medium or Hele-Shaw cell containing a more viscous liquid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 245, 312329.Google Scholar
Serayssol, J.-M. & Davis, R. H. 1986 The influence of surface interactions on the elastohydrodynamic collision of spheres. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 114, 5466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skotheim, J. M. & Mahadevan, L. 2005 Soft lubrication: the elastohydrodynamics of nonconforming and conforming contacts. Phys. Fluids 17, 092101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verneuil, E., Clain, J., Buguin, A. & Brochard-Wyart, F. 2003 Formation of adhesive contacts: spreading versus dewetting. Eur. Phys. J. E 10, 345353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, M. R. E., Craster, R. V. & Matar, O. K. 2004 Fingering phenomena associated with insoluble surfactant spreading on thin liquid films. J. Fluid Mech. 510, 169200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weekley, S. J., Waters, S. L. & Jensen, O. E. 2006 Transient elastohydrodynamic drag on a particle moving near a deformable wall. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 59, 277300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar