Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:42:50.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constrained flow around a magnetic obstacle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2008

EVGENY V. VOTYAKOV ,
EGBERT ZIENICKE  and
YURI B. KOLESNIKOV
EVGENY V. VOTYAKOV
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik, Technische Universität Ilmenau, PF 100565, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany
EGBERT ZIENICKE
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik, Technische Universität Ilmenau, PF 100565, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany
YURI B. KOLESNIKOV
Affiliation:
Fakultät Maschinenbau, Technische Universität Ilmenau, PF 100565, 98684 Ilmenau, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many practical applications exploit an external local magnetic field – magnetic obstacle – as an essential part of their operation. It has been demonstrated that the flow of an electrically conducting fluid influenced by an external field can show several kinds of recirculation. The present paper reports a three-dimensional numerical study, some results of which are compared with an experiment on such a flow in a rectangular duct. First, we derive equations to compute analytically the external magnetic field and verify these equations by comparing with experimentally measured field intensity. Then, we study flow characteristics for different magnetic field configurations. The flow inside the magnetic gap is dependent mainly on the interaction parameter N, which represents the ratio of the Lorentz force to the inertial force. Depending on the constrainment factor κ = My/Ly, where My and Ly are the half-widths of the external magnet and duct, the flow can show different stationary recirculation patterns: two magnetic vortices at small κ, a six-vortex ensemble at moderate κ, and no vortices at large κ. Recirculation appears when N is higher than a critical value Nc,m. The driving force for the recirculation is the reverse electromotive force that arises to balance the reverse electrostatic field. The reversal of the electrostatic field is caused by the concurrence of internal and external vorticity respectively related to the internal and external slopes in the M-shaped velocity profile. The critical value of Nc,m grows quickly as κ increases. For the case of well-developed recirculation, the numerical reverse velocity agrees well with that obtained in experiments. Two different magnetic systems can induce the same electric field and stagnation region provided these systems have the same power of recirculation, given by the N/Nc,m ratio. The three-dimensional helical characteristics of the vortices are elaborated, and an analogy is shown to exist between helical motion inside the recirculation studied and secondary motion in Ekman pumping. Finally, it is shown that a two-dimensional model fails to properly produce stable two- and six-vortex structures as found in the three-dimensional system. Interestingly, these recirculation patterns appear only as time-dependent and unstable transitional states before a Kármán vortex street forms, when one suddenly applies a retarding local magnetic field to a constant flow.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 610 , 10 September 2008 , pp. 131 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acheson, D. J. & Hide, R. 1973 Hydromagnetics of rotating fluids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 36, 159–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Afanasyev, Y. D. 2006 Formation of vortex dipoles. Phys. Fluids 18, 037103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alboussiere, Th. 2004 A geostrophic-like model for large Hartmann number flows. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 125–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andreev, O., Kolesnikov, Yu. & Thess, A. 2007 Experimental study of liquid metal channel flow under the influence of a non-uniform magnetic field. Phys. Fluids 19, 039902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuevas, S., Smolentsev, S. & Abdou, M. 2006 a On the flow past a magnetic obstacle. J. Fluid Mech. 553, 227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuevas, S., Smolentsev, S. & Abdou, M. 2006 b Vorticity generation in creeping flow past a magnetic obstacle. Phys. Rev. E 74, 056301.Google Scholar
Davidson, P. 1999 Magnetohydrodynamics in Materials Processing. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31, 273–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, P. A. 2001 An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desjardins, B., Dormy, E. & Grenier, E. 1999 Stability of mixed Ekman-Hartmann boundary layers. Nonlinearity 12, 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelfgat, Y. M. & Olshanskii, S. V. 1978 Velocity structure of flows in non-uniform constant magnetic fields. ii. experimental results. Magnetohydrodynamics 14, 151–154.Google Scholar
Gelfgat, Y. M., Peterson, D. E. & Shcherbinin, E. V. 1978 Velocity structure of flows in nonuniform constant magnetic fields 1. numerical calculations. Magnetohydrodynamics 14, 55–61.Google Scholar
Gerich, D. & Eckelmann, H. 1982 Influence of end plates and free ends on the shedding frequency of circular cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 122, 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griebel, M., Dornseifer, T. & Neunhoeffer, T. 1995 Numerische Strömungssimulation in der Strömungsmechanik. Vieweg.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. D. 1999 Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd Edn Wiley.Google Scholar
Kit, L. G., Peterson, D. E., Platnieks, I. A. & Tsinober, A. B. 1970 Investigation of the influence of fringe effects on a magnetohydrodynamic flow in a duct with nonconducting walls. Magnetohydrodynamics 6, 485–491.Google Scholar
Kunstreich, S. 2003 Electromagnetic stirring for continuous casting – Part 1. Rev. Met. Paris 100, 395–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavrentiev, I. V., Molokov, S. Yu., Sidorenkov, S. I. & Shishko, A. Ya 1990 Stokes flow in a rectangular magnetohydrodynamic channel with nonconducting walls within a nonuniform magnetic field at large Hartmann numbers. Magnetohydrodynamics 26, 328–338.Google Scholar
Lee, T. & Budwig, R. 1991 A study of the effect of aspect ratio on vortex shedding behind circular cylinders. Phys. Fluids 3, 309–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, R. 1990 Magnetohydrodynamics. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishioka, M. & Sato, H. 1974 Measurements of velocity distributions in the wake of a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 65, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riegels, F. 1938 Zur Kritik des Hele-Shaw-Versuchs. Z Angew. Math. Mech. 18 (2), 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, P. H. 1967 An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics. Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Shair, F. H., Grove, A. S., Petersen, E. E. & Acrivos, A. 1963 The effect of confining walls on the stability of the steady wake behind a circular cylinder. J. Fluid Mech. 17, 546–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shercliff, J. A. 1962 The Theory of Electromagnetic Flow-measurement. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sterl, A. 1990 Numerical simulation of liquid-metal MHD flows in rectangular ducts. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 161–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takeuchi, S., Kubota, J., Miki, Y., Okuda, H. & Shiroyama, A. 2003 Change and trend of molten steel flow technology in a continous casting mould by electromagnetic force. In Proc. EPM-Conference. Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Tananaev, A. B. 1979 MHD duct flows. Moscow: Atomizdat.Google Scholar
Thess, A., Votyakov, E. V. & Kolesnikov, Y. 2006 Lorentz Force Velocimetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 164501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voropayev, S. I. & Afanasyev, Y. D. 1994 Vortex Structures in a Stratified Fluid. Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Votyakov, E. V., Kolesnikov, Y., Andreev, O., Zienicke, E. & Thess, A. 2007 Structure of the wake of a magnetic obstacle. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 144504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Votyakov, E. V. & Zienicke, E. 2007 Numerical study of liquid metal flow in a rectangular duct under the influence of a heterogenous magnetic field. Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process. 3 (2), 97–113.Google Scholar