Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:59:38.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The coalescence of liquid drops in a viscous fluid: interface formation model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 June 2014

James E. Sprittles Open the ORCID record for James E. Sprittles [Opens in a new window]  and
Yulii D. Shikhmurzaev
James E. Sprittles*
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
Yulii D. Shikhmurzaev
Affiliation:
Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK School of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The interface formation model is applied to describe the initial stages of the coalescence of two liquid drops in the presence of a viscous ambient fluid whose dynamics is fully accounted for. Our focus is on understanding (a) how this model’s predictions differ from those of the conventionally used one, (b) what influence the ambient fluid has on the evolution of the shape of the coalescing drops and (c) the coupling of the intrinsic dynamics of coalescence and that of the ambient fluid. The key feature of the interface formation model in its application to the coalescence phenomenon is that it removes the singularity inherent in the conventional model at the onset of coalescence and describes the part of the free surface ‘trapped’ between the coalescing volumes as they are pressed against each other as a rapidly disappearing ‘internal interface’. Considering the simplest possible formulation of this model, we find experimentally verifiable differences with the predictions of the conventional model showing, in particular, the effect of drop size on the coalescence process. According to the new model, for small drops a non-monotonic time dependence of the bridge expansion speed is a feature that could be looked for in further experimental studies. Finally, the results of both models are compared to recently available experimental data on the evolution of the liquid bridge connecting coalescing drops, and the interface formation model is seen to give a better agreement with the data.

JFM classification

Drops and Bubbles: Breakup/coalescence Interfacial Flows (free surface): Capillary flows Drops and Bubbles: Drops and Bubbles
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 751 , 25 July 2014 , pp. 480 - 499
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, D. G. A. L., Lekkerkerker, H. N. W., Guo, H., Wegdam, G. H. & Bonn, D. 2005 Hydrodynamics of droplet coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 164503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellehumeur, C. T., Biaria, M. K. & Vlachopoulos, J. 2004 An experimental study and model assessment of polymer sintering. Polym. Engng Sci. 36, 2198–2207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, T. D. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2002 Dynamic wetting by liquids of different viscosity. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 253, 196–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derby, B. 2010 Inkjet printing of functional and structural materials: fluid property requirements, feature stability and resolution. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 40, 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreher, T. M., Glass, J., O’Connor, A. J. & Stevens, G. W. 1999 Effect of rheology on coalescence rates and emulsion stability. AIChE J. 45, 1182–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchemin, L., Eggers, J. & Josserand, C. 2003 Inviscid coalescence of drops. J. Fluid Mech. 487, 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, J., Lister, J. R. & Stone, H. A. 1999 Coalescence of liquid drops. J. Fluid Mech. 401, 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grissom, W. M. & Wierum, F. A. 1981 Liquid spray cooling of a heated surface. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 24, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R. W. 1984 Coalescence of two equal cylinders: exact results for creeping viscous plane flow driven by capillarity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67, 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R. W. 1990 Plane Stokes flow driven by capillarity on a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R. W. 1993a Coalescence of two viscous cylinders by capillarity: part 1. Theory. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2947–2952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, R. W. 1993b Coalescence of two viscous cylinders by capillarity: part 2. Shape evolution. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 2953–2960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovetz, A. & Olund, B. 1969 The effect of coalescence and condensation on rain formation in a cloud of finite vertical extent. J. Atmos. Sci. 26, 1060–1065.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oguz, H. N. & Prosperetti, A. 1989 Surface-tension effects in the contact of liquid surfaces. J. Fluid Mech. 203, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulsen, J. D., Burton, J. C. & Nagel, S. R. 2011 Viscous to inertial crossover in liquid drop coalescence. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 114501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, S. 1992 Two-dimensional slow viscous flows with time-dependent free boundaries driven by surface tension. Eur. J. Appl. Maths 3, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeman, R., Brinkmann, M., Pfohl, T. & Herminghaus, S. 2012 Droplet based microfluidics. Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 016601.Google Scholar
Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 1996 Spreading of drops on solid surfaces in a quasi-static regime. Phys. Fluids 9, 266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2007 Capillary Flows with Forming Interfaces. Chapman & Hall/CRC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, M., Haverinen, H., Dhagat, P. & Jabbour, G. 2010 Inkjet printing process and its applications. Adv. Mater. 22, 673–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprittles, J. E. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2012a Coalescence of liquid drops: different models versus experiment. Phys. Fluids 24, 122105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprittles, J. E. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2012b The dynamics of liquid drops and their interaction with solids of varying wettabilities. Phys. Fluids 24, 082001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprittles, J. E. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2012c A finite element framework for describing dynamic wetting phenomena. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 68, 1257–1298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprittles, J. E. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D. 2013 Finite element simulation of dynamic wetting flows as an interface formation process. J. Comput. Phys. 233, 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprittles, J. E. & Shikhmurzaev, Y. D.2014 A parametric study of the coalescence of liquid drops in a viscous gas. J. Fluid Mech. (submitted).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squires, T. M. & Quake, S. R. 2005 Microfluidics: fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 977–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thoroddsen, S. T., Takehara, K. & Etoh, T. G. 2005 The coalescence speed of a pendent and sessile drop. J. Fluid Mech. 527, 85–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M., Cubaud, T. & Ho, C. 2004 Scaling law in liquid drop coalescence driven by surface tension. Phys. Fluids 16, 51–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T. 1805 An essay on the cohesion of fluids. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 95, 65–87.Google Scholar