Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T16:00:06.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterising line fountains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 March 2009

G. R. HUNT  and
C. J. COFFEY
G. R. HUNT*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
C. J. COFFEY
Affiliation:
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present analytical solutions for the initial rise height zm of two-dimensional turbulent fountains issuing from a horizontal linear source of width 2b0 into a quiescent environment of uniform density. Using the initial rise height prediction as a measure we classify line fountains into three types depending on their source conditions. For source Froude numbers Fr0 ≫ 1, the near-source flow of the ‘forced’ fountain is dominated by source momentum flux and behaves like a jet; the asymptotic solution to the fountain equations yields, in agreement with previous studies, zm/b0 ~ Fr04/3. For Fr0 = O(1) the fountain is ‘weak’ and fluid is projected vertically to a height that is consistent with an energy-conserving flow – the sensitivity of the rise height with Fr0 increases as zm/b0 ~ Fr02. For Fr0 ≪ 1, the fountain is ‘very weak’ and we find that zm/b0 ~ Fr02/3. As the local value of the Froude number decreases with height, all three forms of fountain behaviour identified are expected above a highly forced source and we provide scalings for the three lengths that contribute to the total rise height. Comparisons between our predicted rise heights and the previous experimental results show good agreement across a wide range of Fr0. The collated data highlights that experiments have focused in the majority on fountains above sources with intermediate Fr0. Notably there is a lack of measurements on very weak line fountains and of independent experimental confirmation of the initial rise heights across the range of Fr0.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 623 , 25 March 2009 , pp. 317 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baines, W. D., Turner, J. S. & Campbell, I. H. 1990 Turbulent fountains in an open chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 557–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1967 An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0–512–66396–2.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. J. & Kerr, R. C. 1998 Turbulent fountains in a stratified fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 358, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, I. H. & Turner, J. S. 1989 Fountains in magma chambers. J. Petrol. 30 (4), 885–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, L. Y. 1988 Ceiling jet-driven wall flows in compartment fires. Combust. Sci. Tech. 62, 285–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyonnaud, L., Solliec, C., de Virel, M. D. & Rey, C. 2000 Design of air curtains used for area confinement in tunnels. Exp. Fluids 28, 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, G. R. & Kaye, N. G. 2001 Virtual origin correction for lazy turbulent plumes. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, N. B. & Hunt, G. R. 2006 Weak fountains. J. Fluid Mech. 558, 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, N. B. & Hunt, G. R. 2007 Overturning in a filling box. J. Fluid Mech. 576, 297–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, R. A. & Turner, J. S. 2008 Personal communication.Google Scholar
Kotsovinos, N. E. & List, E. J. 1977 Plane turbulent buoyant jets. Part 1. Integral properties. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 25–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, W. & Armfield, S. W. 2000 Very weak fountains in a homogeneous fluid. Num. Heat Transfer Part A 38, 377–396.Google Scholar
Liu, Q. A. & Linden, P. F. 2006 The fluid dynamics of an underfloor air distribution system. J. Fluid Mech. 554, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. I. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 234, 1–23.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1966 Jets and plumes with negative or reversing buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 779–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, F. M. 2003 Fluid Mechanics, fifth edn. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Williamson, N., Srinarayana, N., Armfield, S. W., Mcbain, G. D. & Lin, W. 2008 Low-Reynolds-number fountain behaviour. J. Fluid Mech. 608, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, H. & Baddour, R. E. 1997 Maximum vertical penetration of plane turbulent negatively buoyant jets. J. Engng Mech. 123 (10), 973–977.Google Scholar