Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:07:31.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changes in the boundary-layer structure at the edge of the ultimate regime in vertical natural convection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2017

Chong Shen Ng Open the ORCID record for Chong Shen Ng [Opens in a new window] ,
Andrew Ooi ,
Detlef Lohse Open the ORCID record for Detlef Lohse [Opens in a new window]  and
Daniel Chung Open the ORCID record for Daniel Chung [Opens in a new window]
Chong Shen Ng*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Andrew Ooi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
Detlef Lohse
Affiliation:
Physics of Fluids Group, MESA+ Institute and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics and Max Planck Center Twente, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, The Netherlands Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, 37077 Göttingen, Germany
Daniel Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In thermal convection for very large Rayleigh numbers ($Ra$), the thermal and viscous boundary layers are expected to undergo a transition from a classical state to an ultimate state. In the former state, the boundary-layer thicknesses follow a laminar-like Prandtl–Blasius–Polhausen scaling, whereas in the latter, the boundary layers are turbulent with logarithmic corrections in the sense of Prandtl and von Kármán. Here, we report evidence of this transition via changes in the boundary-layer structure of vertical natural convection (VC), which is a buoyancy-driven flow between differentially heated vertical walls. The numerical dataset spans $Ra$ values from $10^{5}$ to $10^{9}$ and a constant Prandtl number value of $0.709$. For this $Ra$ range, the VC flow has been previously found to exhibit classical state behaviour in a global sense. Yet, with increasing $Ra$, we observe that near-wall higher-shear patches occupy increasingly larger fractions of the wall areas, which suggest that the boundary layers are undergoing a transition from the classical state to the ultimate shear-dominated state. The presence of streaky structures – reminiscent of the near-wall streaks in canonical wall-bounded turbulence – further supports the notion of this transition. Within the higher-shear patches, conditionally averaged statistics yield a logarithmic variation in the local mean temperature profiles, in agreement with the log law of the wall for mean temperature, and an $Ra^{0.37}$ effective power-law scaling of the local Nusselt number. The scaling of the latter is consistent with the logarithmically corrected $1/2$ power-law scaling predicted for ultimate thermal convection for very large $Ra$. Collectively, the results from this study indicate that turbulent and laminar-like boundary layer coexist in VC at moderate to high $Ra$ and this transition from the classical state to the ultimate state manifests as increasingly larger shear-dominated patches, consistent with the findings reported for Rayleigh–Bénard convection and Taylor–Couette flows.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulent convection
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 825 , 25 August 2017 , pp. 550 - 572
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahlers, G., Bodenschatz, E., Funfschilling, D., Grossmann, S., He, X., Lohse, D., Stevens, R. J. A. M. & Verzicco, R. 2012 Logarithmic temperature profiles in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 114501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ahlers, G., Bodenschatz, E. & He, X. 2014 Logarithmic temperature profiles of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection in the classical and ultimate state for a Prandtl number of 0.8. J. Fluid Mech. 758, 436–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahlers, G., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2009 Heat transfer and large scale dynamics in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 503–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. C., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135–144.Google Scholar
Businger, J. A., Wyngaard, J. C., Izumi, Y. & Bradley, E. F. 1971 Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–189.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chillà, F & Schumacher, J 2012 New perspectives in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Eur. Phys. J. E 35, 1–25.Google Scholar
Chung, D. & McKeon, B. J. 2010 Large-eddy simulation of large-scale structures in long channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 661, 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eriksson, J. G., Karlsson, R. I. & Persson, J 1998 An experimental study of a two-dimensional plane turbulent wall jet. Exp. Fluids 25, 50–60.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2000 Scaling in thermal convection: a unifying theory. J. Fluid Mech. 407, 27–56.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2001 Thermal convection at large Prandtl numbers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3316–3319.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2002 Prandtl and Rayleigh number dependence of the Reynolds number in turbulent thermal convection. Phys. Rev. E 66, 016305.Google ScholarPubMed
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2004 Fluctuations in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection: the role of plumes. Phys. Fluids 16, 4462–4472.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2011 Multiple scaling in the ultimate regime of thermal convection. Phys. Fluids 23, 045108.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2012 Logarithmic temperature profiles in the ultimate regime of thermal convection. Phys. Fluids 24, 125103.Google Scholar
Grossmann, S., Lohse, D. & Sun, C. 2016 High-Reynolds number Taylor–Couette turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 53–80.Google Scholar
He, X., Funfschilling, D., Nobach, H., Bodenschatz, E. & Ahlers, G. 2012 Transition to the ultimate state of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convections. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 024502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, G. O. & Griffiths, R. W. 2008 Horizontal convection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 40, 185–208.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007a Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007b Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 647–664.Google Scholar
Kline, S. J., Reynolds, W. C., Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 741–773.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn. Pergamon.Google Scholar
Lohse, D. & Xia, K.-Q. 2010 Small-scale properties of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 335–364.Google Scholar
Marusic, I., McKeon, B. J., Monkewitz, P. A., Nagib, H. M., Smits, A. J. & Sreenivasan, K. R. 2010 Wall-bounded turbulent flows at high Reynolds numbers: recent advances and key issues. Phys. Fluids 22, 065103.Google Scholar
Monin, A. S. & Yaglom, A. M. 2007 Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, vol. 1. Courier Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Ng, C. S., Ooi, A., Lohse, D. & Chung, D. 2015 Vertical natural convection: application of the unifying theory of thermal convection. J. Fluid Mech. 764, 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostilla-Mónico, R., van der Poel, E. P., Verzicco, R., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2014 Boundary layer dynamics at the transition between the classical and the ultimate regime of Taylor–Couette flow. Phys. Fluids 26, 015114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallares, J., Vernet, A., Ferre, J. A. & Grau, F. X. 2010 Turbulent large-scale structures in natural convection vertical channel flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 53, 4168–4175.Google Scholar
van der Poel, E. P., Ostilla-Mónico, R., Verzicco, R., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2015 Logarithmic mean temperature profiles and their connection to plume emissions in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 154501.Google Scholar
Pope, S. B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scheel, J. D. & Schumacher, J. 2016 Global and local statistics in turbulent convection at low Prandtl numbers. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 147–173.Google Scholar
Shang, X.-D., Qiu, X.-L., Tong, P. & Xia, K.-Q. 2003 Measured local heat transport in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 074501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shang, X.-D., Tong, P. & Xia, K.-Q. 2008 Scaling of the local convective heat flux in turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 244503.Google Scholar
Shishkina, O. 2016 Momentum and heat transport scalings in laminar vertical convection. Phys. Rev. E 93, 051102.Google Scholar
Shishkina, O., Grossmann, S. & Lohse, D. 2016 Heat and momentum transport scalings in horizontal convection. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 1219–1225.Google Scholar
Shishkina, O. & Horn, S. 2016 Thermal convection in inclined cylindrical containers. J. Fluid Mech. 790, R3.Google Scholar
Smits, A. J., McKeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High-Reynolds number wall turbulence. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43, 353–375.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1979 Buoyancy Effects in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Versteegh, T. A. M. & Nieuwstadt, F. T. M. 1999 A direct numerical simulation of natural convection between two infinite vertical differentially heated walls scaling laws and wall functions. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 42, 3673–3693.Google Scholar
Wei, P. & Ahlers, G. 2014 Logarithmic temperature profiles in the bulk of turbulent Rayleigh–Bénard convection for a Prandtl number of 12.3. J. Fluid Mech. 758, 809–830.Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I., Katz, Y. & Horev, E. 1992 On the applicability of various scaling laws to the turbulent wall jet. J. Fluid Mech. 234, 669–690.Google Scholar
Yaglom, A. M. 1979 Similarity laws for constant-pressure and pressure-gradient turbulent wall flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 505–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar