Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T17:57:22.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The changes in amplitude of short gravity waves on steady non-uniform currents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

M. S. Longuet-Higgins  and
R. W. Stewart
M. S. Longuet-Higgins
Affiliation:
National Institute of Oceanography, Wormley, Surrey
R. W. Stewart
Affiliation:
University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The common assumption that the energy of waves on a non-uniform current U is propagated with a velocity (U + c) where cg is the group-velocity, and that no further interaction takes place, is shown in this paper to be incorrect. In fact the current does additional work on the waves at a rate γijSij where γij is the symmetric rate-of-strain tensor associated with the current, and Sij is the radiation stress tensor introduced earlier (Longuet-Higgins & Stewart 1960).

In the present paper we first obtain an asymptotic solution for the combined velocity potential in the simple case (1) when the non-uniform current U is in the direction of wave propagation and the horizontal variation of U is compensated by a vertical upwelling from below. The change in wave amplitude is shown to be such as would be found by inclusion of the radiation stress term.

In a second example (2) the current on the x-axis is assumed to be as in (1), but the horizontal variation in U is compensated by a small horizontal inflow from the sides. It is found that in that case the wave amplitude is also affected by the horizontal advection of wave energy from the sides.

From cases (1) and (2) the general law of interaction between short waves and non-uniform currents is inferred. This is then applied to a third example (3) when waves encounter a current with vertical axis of shear, at an oblique angle. The change in wave amplitude is shown to differ somewhat from the previously accepted value.

The conclusion that non-linear interactions affect the amplification of the waves has some bearing on the theoretical efficiency of hydraulic and pneumatic breakwaters.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , June 1961 , pp. 529 - 549
Copyright
© 1961 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Drent, J. 1959 A study of waves in the open ocean and of waves on shear currents. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Evans, J. T. 1955 Pneumatic and similar breakwaters. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 231, 457–66.Google Scholar
Groen, P. & Dorrestein, R. 1958 Zeegolven. Kon. Ned. Met. Inst. Publ. 111-11.Google Scholar
Hughes, B. A. 1960 Interaction of waves and a shear flow. M.A. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Johnson, J. W. 1947 The refraction of surface waves by currents. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Un., 28, 867–74.Google Scholar
Kreisel, G. c. 1944 Surface waves. Admirally Report SRE/Wave/1.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1960 Changes in the form of short gravity waves on long waves and tidal currents. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 565–83.Google Scholar
Straub, L. G., Bowers, C. E. & Tarrapore, Z. S. 1959 Experimental studies of pneumatic and hydraulic breakwaters. Univ. Minnesota, St Anthony Falls Lab., Tech. Papers, no. 25, Ser. B.Google Scholar
Suthons, C. T. 1945 (revised 1950) Forecasting of sea and swell waves. Admiralty, Naval Weather Service Dep., Memo. no. 135/45. Also N.W.S. Memos. nos. 180/52 and 135B/58.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1955 The action of a surface current used as a breakwater. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 231, 466–78.Google Scholar
Unna, P. J. H. 1942 Waves and tidal streams. Nature, Lond., 149, 219–20.Google Scholar
Ursell, F. 1960 Steady wave patterns on a non-uniform steady fluid flow. J. Fluid Mech., 9, 333–46.Google Scholar