Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:51:25.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Caution: tripping hazards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2012

N. Hutchins
N. Hutchins*
Affiliation:
Walter Bassett Aerodynamics Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A turbulent boundary layer formed over an external surface is spatially evolving. The flow develops from an initial set of conditions and accordingly the state of the layer at some downstream location owes a debt to its upstream history. Schlatter & Örlü (J. Fluid Mech., this issue, vol. 710, 2012, pp. 5–34) demonstrate succinctly this sensitivity to upstream history, finding that relatively minor modifications to the trip parameters can produce non-canonical development up to surprisingly high Reynolds numbers. This interesting study will serve as a cautionary note to experimentalists and numericists while providing a plausible explanation for some of the disparity noted among previously published results.

JFM classification

Instability: Transition to turbulence Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Focus on Fluids
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 710 , 10 November 2012 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

References

1. Castillo, L. & Johansson, T. G. 2002 The effects of the upstream conditions on a low Reynolds number turbulent boundary layer with zero pressure gradient. J. Turbul. 3 (N31), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Castillo, L., Seo, J., Walker, D., Johansson, G., Hangan, H. & Blissitt, M. 2001 Turbulent boundary layers at very high Reynolds number and its relation to the initial conditions. AIAA Paper 2001-2913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chauhan, K. A., Monkewitz, P. A. & Nagib, H. M. 2009 Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41 (2), 021404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Coles, D. E. 1969 Turbulent boundary layers in pressure gradients. Tech. Rep. RM-6142-PR, USAF. The RAND corporation.Google Scholar
5. Erm, L. P. & Joubert, P. N. 1991 Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Klebanoff, P. S. & Diehl, Z. W. 1951 Some features of artificially thickened fully developed turbulent boundary layers with zero pressure gradient. NACA Tech. Rep. TN 2475.Google Scholar
7. Schlatter, P. & Örlü, R. 2010 Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 659, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Schlatter, P. & Örlü, R. 2012 Turbulent boundary layers at moderate Reynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects. J. Fluid Mech. 710, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar