Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T07:43:03.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking size segregation waves and particle recirculation in granular avalanches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 January 2008

A. R. THORNTON  and
J. M. N. T. GRAY
A. R. THORNTON
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
J. M. N. T. GRAY
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Manchester Centre for Nonlinear Dynamics, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Particle-size segregation is a common feature of dense gravity-driven granular free-surface flows, where sliding and frictional grain–grain interactions dominate. Provided that the diameter ratio of the particles is not too large, the grains segregate by a process called kinetic sieving, which, on average, causes the large particles to rise to the surface and the small grains to sink to the base of the avalanche. When the flowing layer is brought to rest this stratification is often preserved in the deposit and is known by geologists as inverse grading. Idealized experiments with bi-disperse mixtures of differently sized grains have shown that inverse grading can be extremely sharp on rough beds at low inclination angles, and may be modelled as a concentration jump or shock. Several authors have developed hyperbolic conservation laws for segregation that naturally lead to a perfectly inversely graded state, with a pure phase of coarse particles separated from a pure phase of fines below, by a sharp concentration jump. A generic feature of these models is that monotonically decreasing sections of this concentration shock steepen and eventually break when the layer is sheared. In this paper, we investigate the structure of the subsequent breaking, which is important for large-particle recirculation at the bouldery margins of debris flows and for fingering instabilities of dry granular flows. We develop an exact quasi-steady travelling wave solution for the structure of the breaking/recirculation zone, which consists of two shocks and two expansion fans that are arranged in a ‘lens’-like structure. A high-resolution shock-capturing numerical scheme is used to investigate the temporal evolution of a linearly decreasing shock towards a steady-state lens, as well as the interaction of two recirculation zones that travel at different speeds and eventually coalesce to form a single zone. Movies are available with the online version of the paper.

JFM classification

Granular media: Granular media Waves/Free-surface Flows: Wave breaking Mixing: Granular mixing
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 596 , 25 January 2008 , pp. 261 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aranson, I. S. & Tsimring, L. S. 2006 Pattern and collective behavior in granular media: Theortical concepts. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 641–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagnold, R. A. 1954 Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large spheres in a newtonian fluid under shear. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 255, 49–63.Google Scholar
Bressan, A. 2000 Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws: The One-Dimensional Cauchy Problem. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgewater, J. 1976 Fundamental powder mixing mechanisms. Power Technol. 15, 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, M. H., Stephens, D. J. & Bridgewater, J. 1976 Powder mixing – a literature survey. Powder Technol. 15, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denlinger, R. P. & Iverson, R. M. 2004 Granular avalanches across irregular three-dimensional terrain: 1. theory and computation. J. Geophys. Res. 109 (F1), F01014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgunin, V. N., Kudy, A. N. & Ukolov, A. A. 1998 Development of the model of segregation of particles undergoing granular flow down an inclined chute. Powder Technol. 96, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolgunin, V. N. & Ukolov, A. A. 1995 Segregation modelling of particle rapid gravity flow. Powder Technol. 26, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahun, J. A. & Bridgwater, J. 1983 The mechanisms of free surface segregation. Powder Technol. 36, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglit, M. E. 1983 Some mathematical models of snow avalanches. In Advances in Mechanics and the Flow of Granular Materials (ed. Shahinpoor, M.), pp. 577–588. Clausthal-Zellerfeld and Gulf Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Chugunov, V. A. 2006 Particle-size segregation and diffusive remixing in shallow granular avalanches. J. Fluid Mech. 569, 365–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Cui, X. 2007 Weak, strong and detached oblique shocks in gravity driven granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 113–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Shearer, M. & Thornton, A. R. 2006 Time-dependent solution for particle-size segregation in shallow granular avalanches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 462, 947–972.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Tai, Y. C. & Noelle, S. 2003 Shock waves, dead-zones and particle-free regions in rapid granular free surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 491, 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T. & Thornton, A. R. 2005 A theory for particle size segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 461, 1447–1473.Google Scholar
Gray, J. M. N. T., Wieland, M. & Hutter, K. 1999 Free surface flow of cohesionless granular avalanches over complex basal topography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 455, 1841–1874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 1997 The physics of debris flows. Rev. Geophys. 35, 245–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. 2005 Debris-flow mechanics. In Debris Flow Hazards and Related Phenomena (ed. Jakob, M. & Hungr, O.), pp. 105–134. Springer-Praxis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Denlinger, R. P. 2001 Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain 1. coulomb mixture theory. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, R. M. & Vallance, J. W. 2001 New views of granular mass flow. Geology 29, 115–119.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khakhar, D. V., McCarthy, J. J. & Ottino, J. M. 1997 Radial segregation of granular mixtures in rotating cylinders. Phys. Fluids 9, 3600–3614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khakhar, D. V., McCarthy, J. J. & Ottino, J. M. 1999 Mixing and segregation of granular materials in chute flows. Chaos 9, 594–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khakhar, D. V., Orpe, A. V. & Hajra, S. K. 2002 Segregation of granular materials in rotating cylinders. Physica A 318, 129–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVeque, R. J. 2002 Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lighthill, J. 1978 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mangeney-Castelnau, A., Bouchut, B., Vilotte, J., Lajeunesse, E., Aubertin, A. & Pirulli, M. 2005 On the use of saint-venant equations for simulating the spreading of a granular mass. J. Geophys. Res. 110, B09103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middleton, G. V. 1970 Experimental studies related to problems of flysch sedimentation. In Flysch Sedumentology in North America (ed. Lajoie, J.), pp. 253–272. Toronto: Business and Economics Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Middleton, G. V. & Hampton, M. 1976 Subaqueous sediment transport and deposition by sediment gravity waves. In Marine Sediment Transport and Environmental Management (ed. Stanley, D. & Swift, D.), pp. 197–218. Wiley.Google Scholar
Naylor, M. A. 1980 The origin of inverse grading in muddy debris flow deposits – a review. J. Sedimentary Petrol. 50, 1111–1116.Google Scholar
Patra, A. K., Bauer, A. C., Nichita, C. C., Pitman, E. B., Sheridan, M. F., Bursik, M., B., R., Webber, A., Stinton, A. J., Namikawa, L. M. & S., R. C. 2005 Parallel adaptive numerical simulation of dry avalanches over natural terrain. J. Volcan. Geotherm. Res. 139, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, J. C., Hogg, A. J., Kerswell, R. R. & Thomas, N. H. 2006 Enhanced mobility of granular mixtures of fine and coarse particles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 246, 466–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, T. C. 1986 In Hillslope Processes (ed. Abrahams, A. D.), pp. 269–296. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Pouliquen, O., Delour, J. & Savage, S. B. 1997 Fingering in granular flows. Nature 386, 816–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliquen, O. & Forterre, Y. 2002 Friction law for dense granular flows: application to the motion of a mass down a rough inlined plane. J. Fluid Mech. 453, 131–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliquen, O. & Vallance, J. W. 1999 Segregation induced instabilities of granular fronts. Chaos 9, 621–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sallenger, A. H. 1979 Inverse grading and hydraulic equivalence in grain-flow deposits. J. Sedimentary Petrol 49, 553–562.Google Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Hutter, K. 1989 The motion of a finite mass of material down a rough incline. J. Fluid Mech. 199, 177–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, S. B. & Lun, C. K. K. 1988 Particle size segregation in inclined chute flow of dry cohesionless granular material. J. Fluid Mech. 189, 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shearer, M., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Thornton, A. R. 2008 Particle-size segregation and inverse-grading in granular avalanches. Europ. J. Appl. Maths. (in press).Google Scholar
Stoker, J. J. 1957 Water Waves: The Mathematical Theory with Applications, Pure and Applied Mathematics : A Series of Texts and Monographs, vol. IV. Interscience.Google Scholar
Thornton, A. R., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hogg, A. J. 2006 A three phase model of segregation in shallow granular free-surface flows. J. Fluid Mech. 550, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toth, G. & Odstrcil, D. 1996 Comparison of some flux corrected transport and total variation diminishing numerical schemes for hydrodynamic and magnetohydrodynamics problems. J. Comput. Phys. 128, 82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallance, J. W. 2000 Lahars. Encyclopedia of Volcanoes, pp. 601–616. Academic.Google Scholar
Vallance, J. W. & Savage, S. B. 2000 Particle segregation in granular flows down chutes. In IUTAM Symposium on Segregation in Granular Flows (ed. Rosato, A. & Blackmore, D.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wieland, M., Gray, J. M. N. T. & Hutter, K. 1999 Channelised free surface flow of cohesionless granular avalanches in a chute with shallow lateral curvature. J. Fluid Mech. 392, 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yee, H. C. 1989 A class of high-resolution explicit and implicit shock-capturing methods. Tech. Rep. TM-101088. NASA.Google Scholar

Thornton and Gray supplementary movie

Movie 1. Wave Breaking problem. Animation showing the evolution of a breaking size segregation wave in a frame (ξ,z) moving downstream at the same speed as the steady-state lens ulens = 1. A series of stills for this problem are illustrated in figure 6 and the final steady state is shown in figure 4(a). The initial condition consists of a linearly decreasing concentration shock that joins two constant height sections. In response to linear shear through the avalanche depth the shock steepens and breaks at t = 1 to form an oscillating lens. Computations are performed on a 300 x 300 grid and with Sr = 1. Contours of the small particle concentration are illustrated using the colour bar below, with red corresponding to pure fines and blue to pure large. For t > 20 the time-step is increased to speed up the convergence towards the steady-state solution.

Download Thornton and Gray supplementary movie(Video)
Video 1.2 MB

Thornton and Gray supplementary movie

Movie 1. Wave Breaking problem. Animation showing the evolution of a breaking size segregation wave in a frame (ξ,z) moving downstream at the same speed as the steady-state lens ulens = 1. A series of stills for this problem are illustrated in figure 6 and the final steady state is shown in figure 4(a). The initial condition consists of a linearly decreasing concentration shock that joins two constant height sections. In response to linear shear through the avalanche depth the shock steepens and breaks at t = 1 to form an oscillating lens. Computations are performed on a 300 x 300 grid and with Sr = 1. Contours of the small particle concentration are illustrated using the colour bar below, with red corresponding to pure fines and blue to pure large. For t > 20 the time-step is increased to speed up the convergence towards the steady-state solution.

Download Thornton and Gray supplementary movie(Video)
Video 1 MB

Thornton and Gray supplementary movie

Movie 2. Lens interaction. Animation showing the development of the small particle concentration during the interaction of two breaking size segregation waves in a frame (ξ,z) moving downslope with speed unity. A series of stills for this problem are illustrated in figure 8 and the final steady state is shown in figure 4(a). At t = 0 the sharp downward steps in concentration break to form two lenses that propagate in opposite directions with speed 0.4. Just after t = 3 these begin to coalesce to form a single lens between Hup = 0.9 and Hdown = 0.1 that propagates downslope with speed unity. The results are for linear shear and Sr = 1. Computations are performed on a 300 x 300 grid and contours of the small particle concentration are illustrated using the colour bar above, with red corresponding to pure fines and blue to pure large. For t > 20 the time-step is increased to speed up the convergence towards the steady-state solution.

Download Thornton and Gray supplementary movie(Video)
Video 1.2 MB

Thornton and Gray supplementary movie

Movie 2. Lens interaction. Animation showing the development of the small particle concentration during the interaction of two breaking size segregation waves in a frame (ξ,z) moving downslope with speed unity. A series of stills for this problem are illustrated in figure 8 and the final steady state is shown in figure 4(a). At t = 0 the sharp downward steps in concentration break to form two lenses that propagate in opposite directions with speed 0.4. Just after t = 3 these begin to coalesce to form a single lens between Hup = 0.9 and Hdown = 0.1 that propagates downslope with speed unity. The results are for linear shear and Sr = 1. Computations are performed on a 300 x 300 grid and contours of the small particle concentration are illustrated using the colour bar above, with red corresponding to pure fines and blue to pure large. For t > 20 the time-step is increased to speed up the convergence towards the steady-state solution.

Download Thornton and Gray supplementary movie(Video)
Video 1 MB