Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T03:58:17.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviour of an air-assisted jet submitted to a transverse high-frequency acoustic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

F. BAILLOT ,
J.-B. BLAISOT ,
G. BOISDRON  and
C. DUMOUCHEL
F. BAILLOT*
Affiliation:
CORIA, UMR 6614, CNRS, Université et INSA de Rouen, BP 12, 76801 Saint Etienne du Rouvray, France
J.-B. BLAISOT
Affiliation:
CORIA, UMR 6614, CNRS, Université et INSA de Rouen, BP 12, 76801 Saint Etienne du Rouvray, France
G. BOISDRON
Affiliation:
CORIA, UMR 6614, CNRS, Université et INSA de Rouen, BP 12, 76801 Saint Etienne du Rouvray, France Altran AIT, 2 Rue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 92300 Levallois-Perret, France
C. DUMOUCHEL
Affiliation:
CORIA, UMR 6614, CNRS, Université et INSA de Rouen, BP 12, 76801 Saint Etienne du Rouvray, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Acoustic instabilities with frequencies roughly higher than 1 kHz remain among the most harmful instabilities, able to drastically affect the operation of engines and even leading to the destruction of the combustion chamber. By coupling with resonant transverse modes of the chamber, these pressure fluctuations can lead to a large increase of heat transfer fluctuations, as soon as fluctuations are in phase. To control engine stability, the mechanisms leading to the modulation of the local instantaneous rate of heat release must be understood. The commonly developed global approaches cannot identify the dominant mechanism(s) through which the acoustic oscillation modulates the local instantaneous rate of heat release. Local approaches are being developed based on processes that could be affected by acoustic perturbations. Liquid atomization is one of these processes. In the present paper, the effect of transverse acoustic perturbations on a coaxial air-assisted jet is studied experimentally. Here, five breakup regimes have been identified according to the flow conditions, in the absence of acoustics. The liquid jet is placed either at a pressure anti-node or at a velocity anti-node of an acoustic field. Acoustic levels up to 165 dB are produced. At a pressure anti-node, breakup of the liquid jet is affected by acoustics only if it is assisted by the coaxial gas flow. Effects on the liquid core are mainly due to the unsteady modulation of the annular gas flow induced by the acoustic waves when the mean dynamic pressure of the gas flow is lower than the acoustic pressure amplitude. At a velocity anti-node, local nonlinear radiation pressure effects lead to the flattening of the jet into a liquid sheet. A new criterion, based on an acoustic radiation Bond number, is proposed to predict jet flattening. Once the sheet is formed, it is rapidly atomized by three main phenomena: intrinsic sheet instabilities, Faraday instability and membrane breakup. Globally, this process promotes atomization. The spray is also spatially organized under these conditions: large liquid clusters and droplets with a low ejection velocity can be brought back to the velocity anti-node plane, under the action of the resulting radiation force. These results suggest that in rocket engines, because of the large number of injectors, a spatial redistribution of the spray could occur and lead to inhomogeneous combustion producing high-frequency combustion instabilities.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Acoustics Drops and Bubbles: Aerosols/atomization
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 640 , 10 December 2009 , pp. 305 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, O., Hansmann, S. & Bauckage, K. 1996 Production of fine particles from melts of metal or highly viscous fluids by ultrasonic wave atomization. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 13, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. & Yang, V. 1995 Liquid Rocket Engine Combustion Instability, Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 169. AIAA, Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anilkumar, A. V., Lee, C. P. & Wang, T. G. 1993 Stability of an acoustically leviated and flattened drop. Phys. Fluids A5 (11), 2763–2774.Google Scholar
Bauckage, K., Andersen, O., Hansmann, S., Reich, W. & Schreckenberg, P. 1996 Production of fine powders by ultrasonic standing wave atomization. Powder Technol. 86, 77–86.Google Scholar
Boluriaan, S. & Morris, P. J. 2003 Acoustic streaming: from Rayleigh to today. Intl J. Aeroacous. 2 (3–4), 255–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenn, G., Prebeg, Z., Rensink, D. & Yarin, A. L. 2005 Control of spray formation by vibrational excitation of flat-fan and conical liquid sheets. Atom. Sprays 15, 661–685.Google Scholar
Buffum, F. G. & Williams, F. A. 1967 Response of Turbulent Jets to Transverse Acoustic Fields. In Proceedings of the 1967 Heat Transfer and Fluid Mechanics Institute (ed. Libby, P. A., Olfe, D. B. & Van Atta, C. W.), pp. 247–276. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Cabeza, C., Gibiat, V. & Negreira, C. 2003 Observation of highly localized structures in a Faraday experiment with highly dissipative fluids. Physica A 327, 34–38.Google Scholar
Candel, S., Huynh, C. & Poinsot, T. 1996 Unsteady Combustion. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Carpentier, J. B., Baillot, F., Blaisot, J. B. & Dumouchel, C. 2009 behaviour of cylindrical liquid jets evolving in a transverse acoustic field. Phys. Fluids 21, 023601-1–023601-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chehroudi, B. & Talley, D. 2002 Preliminary visualizations of acoustic waves interacting with subcritical and supercritical cryogenic jets. In 15th Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems (ILASS Americas), Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Cheuret, F. 2005 Instabilités thermo-acoustiques de combustion haute-fréquence dans les moteurs fusées. PhD thesis, University of Provence-Aix-Marseille I.Google Scholar
Davis, D. W. 2006 On the behaviour of a shear-coaxial jet, spanning sub- to supercritical pressures with and without an externally imposed transverse acoustic field. PhD thesis, Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Davis, D. W. & Chehroudi, B. 2006 Shear-coaxial jets from a rocket-like injector in a transverse acoustic field at high pressures. In 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faraday, M. 1831 On the forms and states of fluids on vibrating elastic surfaces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 52, 319–340.Google Scholar
Farago, Z. & Chigier, N. 1992 Morphological classification of disintegration of round jets in a coaxial airstream. Atom. Sprays 2, 137–153.Google Scholar
Gomi, H. 1985 Pneumatic atomization with coaxial injectors: measurements of drop sizes by the diffraction method and liquid phase fraction by the attenuation of light. Tech Rep. TR-888T. National Aerospace Laboratory.Google Scholar
Hager, F. & Benes, E. 1991 A summary of all forces acting on spherical particles in a sound field. In Proceedings of the Ultrasonic International Conference. Le Touquet, France, pp. 283–286.Google Scholar
Harrje, D. T. & Reardon, F. H. 1972 Liquid Propellant Rocket Combustion Instability, vol. NASA SP-194. NASA.Google Scholar
Hoover, D. V., Ryan, H. M., Pal, S., Merkie, C. L., Jacobs, H. R. & Santoro, R. J. 1991 Pressure oscillations effects on the jet breakup. Heat Mass Transfer Spray Syst. 187, 27–36.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. 1998 Liquid jet instability and atomisation in a coaxial gas stream. In Advances in Turbulence VII (ed. U. Frich), pp. 69–78.Google Scholar
Hopfinger, E. J. & Lasheras, J. C. 1994 Breakup of a water jet in high velocity co-flowing air. In Proceedings of the ICLASS 1994. Rouen, France.Google Scholar
Ingebo, R. D. 1992 Effect of gas mass flux on cryogenic liquid jet breakup. Cryogenics 32 (3), 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H. & Sohn, C. H. 2007 Experimental study of acoustic damping induced by gas–liquid scheme injectors in a combustion chamber. J. Mech. Sci. Tech. 21, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L. V. 1934 On the acoustic radiation pressure on spheres. Proc. R. Soc. Lond A 147 (861), 212–240.Google Scholar
Landau, L. & Lifchitz, E. 1989 Mécanique des Fluides, ed. MIR, 1989.Google Scholar
Lang, R. J. 1962 Ultrasonic atomization of liquids. J. Acous. Soc. Am. 34, 6.Google Scholar
Lasheras, J. C. & Hopfinger, E. J. 2000 Liquid jet instability and atomisation in a coaxial gas stream. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 275–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. P., Anilkumar, A. V. & Wang, T. G. 1991 Static shape and instability of an acoustically levitated drop. Phys. Fluids A3 (11), 2497–2515.Google Scholar
Lee, C. P. & Wang, T. G. 1993 Acoustic radiation pressure. J. Acous. Soc Am. 94 (2), 1099–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessmann, N. 2004 Numerical and experimental investigation of the disintegration of polymer melts in an ultrasonic standing wave atomizer. PhD thesis, Paderborn University.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, A. H. 1989 Atomization and Sprays. Hemisphere.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lierke, E. G. 1996 Akustische Positionerung – Ein umfassender Ueberblick, ueber Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Acta Acous. 82 (220–237).Google Scholar
Marmottant, P. 2001 Atomisation d'un liquide par un courant gazeux. PhD thesis, University of Grenoble.Google Scholar
Mitome, H. 1998 The machanism of generation of acoustic streaming. Electron. Comm. Jpn, Part 3 81 (10), 1–30.Google Scholar
Oschwald, M., Smith, J. J., Branam, R., Hussong, J., Schik, A., Chehroudi, B. & Talley, D. 2006 Injection of fluids into supercritical environments. Combust. Sci. Technol. 178, 49–100.Google Scholar
Otsu, N. 1979 A threshold selection method from grey scale histogram. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybernet. 1, 63–66.Google Scholar
Petit, L. & Gondret, P. 1992 Redressement d'un écoulement alternatif. J. Phys. II 2, 2115–2144.Google Scholar
Raynal, L. 1997 Instabilité et entraînement à l'interface d'une couche de mélange liquide-gaz. PhD thesis, University of Grenoble.Google Scholar
Reipschläger, O., Bothe, D., Warnecke, H. J., Morien, B., Prss, J. & Weigand, B. 2002 Modelling and simulation of the disintegration process in an ultrasonic standing wave atomizer. In ILASS-Europe 2002, Saragossa, Spain.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 2004 Interactions collectives dans les instabilités de combustion haute fréquence. Application aux moteurs-fusées ergols liquides. PhD thesis, University of PARIS VI, Ecole Centrale Paris.Google Scholar
Sindayihebura, D., Cousin, J. & Dumouchel, C. 1997 Experimental and theoretical study of sprays produced by ultrasonic atomisers. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 14 (2), 93–101.Google Scholar
Sujith, R. I. 2005 An experimental investigation of interaction of sprays with acoustic fields. Exp. Fluids 38, 576–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villermaux, E. 1998 Mixing and spray formation in coaxial jets. J. Propul. Power 14 (5), 807–817.Google Scholar
Vingert, L., Gicquel, P., Lourme, D. & Menoret, L. 1995 Coaxial Injector atomization. In Liquid Rocket Engine Combustion Instability (ed. V. Yang & W. Anderson), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 169, pp. 145–189. AIAA.Google Scholar
Woods, D. & Lin, S. P. 1995 Instability of a liquid film flow over a vibrating inclined plane wave. J. Fluid Mech. 294, 391–407.Google Scholar
Yarin, A. L., Pfaffenlehner, M. & Tropea, C. 1998 On the acoustic levitation of droplets. J. Fluid Mech. 356, 65–91.Google Scholar