Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T23:56:22.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymptotic solutions for the distribution function in non-equilibrium flows. Part 1. The weak shock

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

Roddam Narasimha
Roddam Narasimha
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore and California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is the first part of an investigation of the molecular velocity distribution function in non-equilibrium flows. In this part, the general features of the distribution are discussed and illustrated by a detailed study of its asymptotic expansions in different velocity domains for a weak shock, employing a simple relaxation model for the collisions. Using the strength of the shock as a small parameter, the Chapman–Enskog distribution is derived, in a less restrictive way than in previous analyses, as the first two terms in a suitable ‘inner’ asymptotic expansion of the distribution in velocity space, valid only for not very high velocities. It is shown that the consideration of two further limits, called the intermediate and outer, is necessary for a complete description of the distribution in velocity space. The uniformly valid composite expansion demonstrates the slow approach to equilibrium of fast molecules. The outer solution depends on integrals over the flow and is in general ‘global’, in contrast to the inner solution which is essentially local; this introduces certain asymmetries on a fine scale even in a weak shock. It is shown, for example, that fast molecules moving towards the hot side accumulate by collisionless streaming, whereas those moving towards the cold side attenuate like a molecular beam and represent essentially a ‘precursor’ of the hot side. A simple approximation for the distribution in the precursor is derived, and found to contain, in the outer limit, a large perturbation on the local Maxwellian; this results in an approach to equilibrium like $\exp (-|x|^{\frac{2}{3}})$ on the cold side.

A heuristic extension of the argument to the true Boltzmann equation leads to the result that for molecules with an interparticle potential varying as the inverse m-power of the distance, the approach to equilibrium through the precursor is like $\exp (-|x|^l)$, where l = m/(m + 2).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , 16 October 1968 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
© 1968 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhatnagar, P. L., Gross, E. P. & Krook, M. 1954 A model for collision processes in gases. I Phys. Rev. 94, 511.Google Scholar
Chahine, M. T. & Narasimha, R. 1964 The integral ∫vn exp {−(v−u)2−x/v} dv. J. Math. Phys. 43, 163.Google Scholar
Chapman, S. & Cowling, T. G. 1952 The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases. Cambridge University Press.
DARROZÉS, J. 1963 Étude de la structure d'un choc faible avec le modèle einetique de Krook—Boltzmann. Rech. Aerosp. pp. 17–22.Google Scholar
Enskog, D. 1928 Über die Grundgleichungen in der Kinetischen Theorie der Flüssigkeiten und der Gase. Ark. Mat. Ast. Fys. 21 A, no. 13.Google Scholar
Grad, H. 1949 On the kinetic theory of rarefied gases Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 4, 331.Google Scholar
Grad, H. 1958 Principles of the kinetic theory of gases. In Handbuch der Physik, vol. 12. Ed. by S. Flugge. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kaplun, S. & Lagerstrom, P. A. 1957 Asymptotic expansions of Navier—Stokes solutions for small Reynolds numbers J. Math. Mech. 6, 585.Google Scholar
Lees, L. 1959 A kinetic theory description of rarefied gas flow, GALCIT Hypersonic Research Project, Memo, no. 51.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H. W., Narasimha, R. & Chahine, M. T. 1962 Structure of a plane shock layer Phys. Fluids, 5, 1313.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1956 Viscosity effects in sound waves of finite amplitude. In Surveys in Mechanics. Ed. G. K. Batchelor and R. M. Davies. Cambridge University Press.
Lyubarskii, G. YA. 1961 On the kinetic theory of shock waves Sov. Phys. JETP, 13, 740.Google Scholar
MOTT-SMITH, H. M. 1951 The solution of the Boltzmann equation for a shock wave Phys. Rev. 82, 885.Google Scholar
Narasimha, R. 1961 Some flow problems in rarefied gas dynamics. Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology.
Narasimha, R. 1967 The structure of the distribution function in gas kinetic flows. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium, Oxford. New York: Academic Press.
Schaaf, S. A. & CHAMBRÉ, P. L. 1958 Flow of rarefied gases. In Fundamentals of Gas Dynamics. Vol. 3, of High Speed Aerodynamics and Jet Propulsion. Ed. H. W. Emmons. Princeton University Press.
Sherman, F. S. 1955 A low density wind tunnel study of shock wave structure and relaxation phenomena in gases, NACA Tech. Note, 3298.Google Scholar
Sherman, F. S. & Talbot, L. 1960 Experiment versus kinetic theory for rarefied gases. In Rarefied Gas Dynamics, Proc. I Int. Symp., Nice. Ed. F. M. Devienne.
Taylor, G. I. 1910 The conditions necessary for discontinuous motion in gases. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 84, 371.Google Scholar
VAN DYKE, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. New York: Academic Press.
Welander, P. 1954 On the temperature jump in a rarefied gas Ark. Fys. 7, 44.Google Scholar
Wetzel, L. 1964 Far flow approximations for precursor ionization profiles AIAA J. 2, 1208.Google Scholar