Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:59:04.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of direct numerical simulation data of turbulent boundary layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2010

PHILIPP SCHLATTER  and
RAMIS ÖRLÜ
PHILIPP SCHLATTER*
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
RAMIS ÖRLÜ
Affiliation:
Linné Flow Centre, KTH Mechanics, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Statistics obtained from seven different direct numerical simulations (DNSs) pertaining to a canonical turbulent boundary layer (TBL) under zero pressure gradient are compiled and compared. The considered data sets include a recent DNS of a TBL with the extended range of Reynolds numbers Reθ = 500–4300. Although all the simulations relate to the same physical flow case, the approaches differ in the applied numerical method, grid resolution and distribution, inflow generation method, boundary conditions and box dimensions. The resulting comparison shows surprisingly large differences not only in both basic integral quantities such as the friction coefficient cf or the shape factor H12, but also in their predictions of mean and fluctuation profiles far into the sublayer. It is thus shown that the numerical simulation of TBLs is, mainly due to the spatial development of the flow, very sensitive to, e.g. proper inflow condition, sufficient settling length and appropriate box dimensions. Thus, a DNS has to be considered as a numerical experiment and should be the subject of the same scrutiny as experimental data. However, if a DNS is set up with the necessary care, it can provide a faithful tool to predict even such notoriously difficult flow cases with great accuracy.

JFM classification

Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers Turbulent Flows: Turbulence simulation
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 659 , 25 September 2010 , pp. 116 - 126
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, H., Kawamura, H. & Matsuo, Y. 2004 Surface heat-flux fluctuations in a turbulent channel flow up to Re τ = 1020 with Pr = 0.025 and 0.71. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 25, 404–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J. & Jiménez, J. 2003 Spectra of the very large anisotropic scales in turbulent channels. Phys. Fluids 15, L41–L44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
del Álamo, J., Jiménez, J., Zandonade, P. & Moser, R. D. 2004 Scaling of the energy spectra of turbulent channels. J. Fluid Mech. 500, 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alfredsson, P. H., Johansson, A. V., Haritonidis, J. H. & Eckelmann, H. 1988 The fluctuating wall-shear stress and the velocity field in the viscous sublayer. Phys. Fluids 31, 1026–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschmann, M. H., Indinger, T. & Gad-el-Hak, M. 2009 Near-wall behaviour of turbulent wall-bounded flows. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 30, 993–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, K. A., Monkewitz, P. A. & Nagib, H. M. 2009 Criteria for assessing experiments in zero pressure gradient boundary layers. Fluid Dyn. Res. 41, 021404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erm, L. P. & Joubert, P. 1991 Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 230, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernholz, H. H. & Finley, P. 1996 The incompressible zero-pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer: an assessment of the data. Prog. Aerosp. Sci 32, 245–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrante, A. & Elghobashi, S. E. 2005 Reynolds number effect on drag reduction in a microbubble-laden spatially developing turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyas, S. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Scaling of the velocity fluctuations in turbulent channels up to Re τ = 2003. Phys. Fluids 18, 011702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwamoto, K., Suzuki, Y. & Kasagi, N. 2002 Reynolds number effect on wall turbulence: toward effective feedback control. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 23, 678–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasagi, N. & Shikazono, N. 1995 Contribution of direct numerical simulation to understanding and modelling turbulent transport. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 451, 257–292.Google Scholar
Kawamura, H., Abe, H. & Matsuo, Y. 1999 DNS of turbulent heat transfer in channel flow with respect to Reynolds and Prandtl number effects. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 20, 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khujadze, G. & Oberlack, M. 2004 DNS and scaling laws from new symmetry groups of ZPG turbulent boundary layer flow. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 18, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khujadze, G. & Oberlack, M. 2007 New scaling laws in ZPG turbulent boundary layer flow. In Proceedingsof the Fifth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, München, Germany, pp. 443–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komminaho, J. & Skote, M. 2002 Reynolds stress budgets in Couette and boundary layer flows. Flow Turbul. Combust. 68, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, T. S., Wu, X. & Squires, K. D. 1998 Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 140, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monkewitz, P. A., Chauhan, K. A. & Nagib, H. M. 2008 Comparison of mean flow similarity laws in zero pressure gradient turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 20, 105102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickels, T. B. 2004 Inner scaling for wall-bounded flows subject to large pressure gradients. J. Fluid Mech. 521, 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örlü, R. 2009 Experimental studies in jet flows and zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layers. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Österlund, J. M. 1999 Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P., Li, Q., Brethouwer, G., Johansson, A. V. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 a High-Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers studied by numerical simulation. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 54, 59.Google Scholar
Schlatter, P., Örlü, R., Li, Q., Brethouwer, G., Fransson, J. H. M., Johansson, A. V., Alfredsson, P. H. & Henningson, D. S. 2009 b Turbulent boundary layers up to Re θ = 2500 studied through simulation and experiment. Phys. Fluids 21, 051702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlatter, P., Li, Q., Brethouwer, G., Johansson, A. V. & Henningson, D. S. 2010 Simulations of spatially evolving turbulent boundary layers up to Re θ = 4300. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 31, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simens, M. P., Jiménez, J., Hoyas, S. & Mizuno, Y. 2009 A high-resolution code for turbulent boundary layers. J. Comput. Phys. 228, 4218–4231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smits, A. J., Matheson, N. & Joubert, P. N. 1983 Low-Reynolds-number turbulent boundary layers in zero and favourable pressure gradients. J. Ship Res. 27, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalart, P. 1988 Direct simulation of a turbulent boundary layer up to R θ = 1410. J. Fluid Mech. 187, 61–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsukahara, T., Seki, Y., Kawamura, H. & Tochio, D. 2005 DNS of turbulent channel flow at very low Reynolds numbers. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 935–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, X. & Moin, P. 2009 Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 630, 5–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar