Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:33:15.590Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Annular swirling liquid layer with a hollow core

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

P. M. Bardet Open the ORCID record for P. M. Bardet [Opens in a new window] ,
P. F. Peterson  and
Ö. Savaş
P. M. Bardet
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1730, USA
P. F. Peterson
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1730, USA
Ö. Savaş
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-1740, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A thick turbulent annular liquid layer that swirls inside a fixed pipe is studied by means of surface observations and stereoscopic particle image velocimetry in an index-matched nozzle facility. This flow combines the complexities of swirling and free-surface turbulence. The free surface of the layer changes the boundary condition compared to filled swirling pipes and introduces the equivalent of a hollow core. The liquid layer shares similarities with turbulent open-channel flows, with the high centrifugal force across the layer having a similar effect to that of gravity in channel flows. At the surface, the restoring forces are surface tension and centrifugal acceleration. The particular nozzle under study has been envisioned for inertial confinement fusion, but the flow has relevance to systems such as compact separators or liquid rocket fuel injectors. Data are acquired at five downstream locations from the nozzle exit for four Reynolds numbers for subcritical flows. Injection flow rate and fluid kinematic viscosity are controlled independently, which allows adjusting independently the Reynolds and Taylor–Reynolds numbers. This also enables control of the centrifugal force at the free surface to test the effects of turbulence intensity on the free surface in regimes where air entrainment and droplet ejection occur. The swirl number is fixed by the design of the nozzle. From velocimetry data, mean velocity and turbulence statistics are extracted. For all the conditions tested, three flow regimes are identified: developing, developed, and transitional. The developed regime appears self-similar on the mean; the swirl creates a favourable pressure gradient that sustains the axial flow and confines the boundary layer near the wall. Large coherent vortex structures are identified in the layer. A simple model is proposed to describe the layer thickness and the velocity distribution in it. In the transitional regime, helical varicose waves generated by centrifugal instability are observed on the surface. Additionally, wall effects are visible in the bulk of the flow, and the main flow features are large overturning motions.

JFM classification

Multiphase and Particle-laden Flows: Multiphase flow Turbulent Flows: Rotating turbulence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 841 , 25 April 2018 , pp. 784 - 824
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrian, R. J., Christensen, K. T. & Liu, Z.-C. 2000 Analysis and interpretation of instantaneous turbulent velocity fields. Exp. Fluids 29, 275–290.Google Scholar
Andrade, E. N. da C. 1963 Whirlpools, vortices and bath tubs. New Sci. 17 (325), 302–304.Google Scholar
Bardet, P. M. & Peterson, P. F. 2008 Options for scaled experiments for high temperature liquid salt and helium fluid mechanics and convective heat transfer. Nucl. Technol. 163, 344–357.Google Scholar
Bardet, P. M., Peterson, P. F. & Savaş, Ö. 2010 Split-screen single-camera stereoscopic PIV application to a turbulent confined swirling layer with free surface. Exp. Fluids 49 (2), 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazarov, V., Yang, V. & Puri, P. 2004 Design and dynamics of jet and swirl injectors. In Liquid Rocket Thrust Chambers: Aspects of Modeling, Analysis, and Design (ed. Yang, V., Habiballah, M., Hulka, J. & Popp, M.), Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 200, chap. 2, pp. 19–103. AIAA.Google Scholar
Binnie, A. M. 1951 Theory of waves travelling on the core in a swirling liquid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 205, 530–540.Google Scholar
Binnie, A. M. 1964 Annular hydraulic jumps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 282, 155–165.Google Scholar
Binnie, A. M. & Hookings, G. A. 1948 Laboratory experiments on whirlpools. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 194, 398–415.Google Scholar
Borodin, V. A., Dityakin, Y. F., Klyachko, L. A. & Yagodkin, V. I.1968 Atomization of Liquids. Air Force Foreign Technology Report FTD-MT-24-97-68 (AD0685151).Google Scholar
Bradshaw, P. 1973 Effects of streamlines curvature on turbulent flow. AGARDograph 169. AGARD.Google Scholar
Brocchini, M. & Peregrine, D. H. 2001 The dynamics of strong turbulence at free surfaces. Part 1. Description. J. Fluid Mech. 449, 225–254.Google Scholar
Brumley, B. H. & Jirka, G. H. 1987 Near-surface turbulence in a grid-stirred tank. J. Fluid Mech. 183, 235–263.Google Scholar
Bullock, K. J., Cooper, R. E. & Abernathy, F. H. 1978 Structural similarity in radial correlations and spectra of longitudinal velocity fluctuations in pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 88 (3), 585–608.Google Scholar
Calmet, I. & Magnaudet, J. 2003 Statistical structure of high-Reynolds-number turbulence close to the free surface of an open-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 474, 355–378.Google Scholar
Chin, C. C., Monty, J. P., Ooi, A. S. H. & Marusic, I. 2007 Investigation of velocity correlations in turbulent channel flow. In 16th Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference.Google Scholar
Cox, C. S. 1958 Measurements of slopes of high-frequency wind waves. J. Mar. Res. 16 (3), 199–245.Google Scholar
Dabiri, D. & Gharib, M. 1997 Experimental investigation of the vorticity generation within a spilling water wave. J. Fluid Mech. 330, 113–139.Google Scholar
Ewing, D. 1999 Decay of round turbulent jets with swirl. In Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modeling and Experiments, pp. 461–470. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Hutchins, N., Hambleton, W. T., Longmire, E. K. & Marusic, I. 2005 Investigation of large-scale coherence in a turbulent boundary layer using two-point correlations. J. Fluid Mech. 524, 57–80.Google Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Longmire, E. K. & Marusic, I. 2003 Characteristics of vortex packets in turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 478, 35–46.Google Scholar
George, J., Minel, F. & Grisenti, M. 1994 Physical and hydrodynamical parameters controlling gas–liquid mass transfer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 37, 1569–1578.Google Scholar
Gharib, M. & Weigand, A. 1996 Experimental studies of vortex disconnection and connection at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 321, 59–86.Google Scholar
Gomez, L., Mohan, R. & Shoham, O. 2004a Swirling gas–liquid two-phase flow – experiment and modeling part I: swirling flow field. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 126, 935–942.Google Scholar
Gomez, L., Mohan, R. & Shoham, O. 2004b Swirling gas–liquid two-phase flow – experiment and modeling part II: turbulent quantities and core stability. Trans. ASME J. Fluids Engng 126, 943–959.Google Scholar
Guo, X. & Shen, L. 2010 Interaction of a deformable free surface with statiscally homogeneous turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 658, 33–62.Google Scholar
Handler, R. A., Swean, T. F. Jr, Leighton, R. I. & Swearingen, J. D. 1993 Length scales and the energy balance for turbulence near a free surface. AIAA J. 31 (11), 1998–2007.Google Scholar
Herlina, H. & Jirka, G. H. 2008 Experiments on gas transfer at the air–water interface induced by oscillating grid turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 594, 183–208.Google Scholar
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence: An Introduction to Its Mechanism and Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hodges, B. R. & Street, R. L. 1999 On simulation of turbulent nonlinear free-surface flows. J. Comput. Phys. 151, 425–457.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I 2007a Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28.Google Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007b Large-scale influences in near-wall turbulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 365, 647–664.Google Scholar
Jain, S. C. 2001 Open-Channel Flow, 1st edn. John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kenny, R. J., Hulk, J. R., Moser, M. D. & Rhys, N. O. 2009 Effect of chamber backpressure on swirl injector fluid mechanics. J. Propul. Power 25 (4), 902–913.Google Scholar
Kitoh, O. 1991 Experimental study of turbulent swirling flow in a straight pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 225, 445–479.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Nagaosa, R., Murakami, Y., Chiba, S., Ishii, K. & Kuwahara, K. 2003 Direct numerical simulation of three-dimensional open-channel flow with zero-shear gas–liquid interface. Phys. Fluids 5, 115–127.Google Scholar
Komori, S., Ueda, H., Ogino, F. & Mizushina, T. 1982 Turbulence structure and transport mechanism at the free surface in an open channel flow. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 25 (4), 513–521.Google Scholar
Kumar, S., Gupta, R. & Banerjee, S. 1998 An experimental investigation of the characteristics of free-surface turbulence in channel flow. Phys. Fluids 10 (2), 437–456.Google Scholar
Li, F. C., Kawaguchi, Y. & Segawa, T. 2005 Wave–turbulence interaction of a low-speed plane liquid wall-jet investigated by particle image velocimetry. Phys. Fluids 17, 082101.Google Scholar
Lin, J. C. & Rockwell, D. 1995 Evolution of a quasi-steady breaking wave. J. Fluid Mech. 302, 29–44.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1992 Capillary rollers and bores. J. Fluid Mech. 240, 659–679.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1998 Vorticity and curvature at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 356, 149–153.Google Scholar
Lugt, H. J. 1987 Local flow properties at a viscous free surface. Phys. Fluids 30 (12), 3647–3652.Google Scholar
Lumley, J. L. 1970 Stochastic Tools in Turbulence. Academic.Google Scholar
Lundgren, T. & Koumoutsakos, P. 1999 On the generation of vorticity at a free surface. J. Fluid Mech. 382, 351–366.Google Scholar
McKenna, S. P. & McGillis, W. R. 2004 The role of free-surface turbulence and surfactants in air–water gas transfer. Intl J. Heat Mass Transfer 47, 539–553.Google Scholar
Nezu, I. & Rodi, W. 1986 Open-channel flow measurements with a laser Doppler anemometer. ASCE J. Hydraul. Engng 112 (5), 335–355.Google Scholar
Pemberten, S. J., Abbott, R. P. & Peterson, P. F. 2003 Annular vortex generation for inertial fusion energy beam-line protection. Fusion Sci. Technol. 43, 378–383.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1960 Centrifugal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 340–352.Google Scholar
Qiao, H. & Duncan, J. H. 2001 Gentle spilling breakers: crest flow-field evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 439, 57–85.Google Scholar
Rashidi, M. & Banerjee, S. 1988 Turbulence structure in free-surface channel flows. Phys. Fluids 31 (9), 2491–2503.Google Scholar
Rood, E. P. 1995 Vorticity interactions with a free surface. In Fluid Vortices. Fluid Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 30 (ed. Green, S. I.), pp. 687–730. Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sallam, K. A. & Faeth, G. M. 2003 Surface properties during primary breakup of turbulent liquid jets in still air. AIAA J. 41 (8), 1514–1524.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. & Merrill, C. 1999 Spray formation at the free surface of liquid wall jets. In 22nd Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, pp. 796–808.Google Scholar
Sarpkaya, T. & Merrill, C. F. 2001 Spray generation from turbulent plane water wall jets discharging in quiescent air. AIAA J. 39 (7), 1217–1229.Google Scholar
Shiri, A.2010 Turbulence measurements in a natural convection boundary layer and a swirling jet. PhD thesis, Chalmers University of Technology.Google Scholar
Sholl, M. J. & Savaş, Ö.1997 A fast lagrangian PIV method for study of general high gradient flows. In 35th Aerospace Sciences Meeting/Measurement Technology. Reno NV, AIAA Paper 97-0493.Google Scholar
Shumway, R. H. & Stoffer, D. S. 2006 Time Series Analysis and Its Applications, 2nd edn. Springer.Google Scholar
Smolentsev, S. & Miraghaie, R. 2005 Study of a free surface in an open-channel water flows in the regime from ‘weak’ to ‘strong’ turbulence. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 31, 921–939.Google Scholar
Speziale, C. G., Younis, B. A. & Berger, S. A. 2000 Analysis and modelling of turbulent flow in an axially rotating pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 407, 1–26.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1948 The mechanism of swirl atomizers. In Proceedings of the 7th International Congress for Applied Mechanics, London, vol. 2, pp. 280–285.Google Scholar
Teixeira, M. A. C. & Belcher, S. E. 2000 Dissipation of shear-free turbulence near boundaries. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 167–191.Google Scholar
Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1974 A First Course in Turbulence. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tomkins, C. D. & Adrian, R. J. 2003 Spanwise structure and scale growth in turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 490, 37–74.Google Scholar
Wu, P.-K. & Faeth, G. M. 1995 Onset and end drop formation along the surface of turbulent liquid jets in still gases. Phys. Fluids 7 (11), 2915–2917.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, Y., Kunugi, T. & Serizawa, A. 2001 Turbulence statistics and scalar transport in an open-channel flow. J. Turbul. 2, N10.Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Adrian, R. J., Balachandar, S. & Kendall, T. M. 1999 Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387, 353–396.Google Scholar