Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T05:10:24.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of shock motion in shockwave and turbulent boundary layer interaction using direct numerical simulation data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 December 2007

MINWEI WU  and
M. PINO MARTÍN
MINWEI WU
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
M. PINO MARTÍN
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Direct numerical simulation data of a Mach 2.9, 24○ compression ramp configuration are used to analyse the shock motion. The motion can be observed from the animated DNS data available with the online version of the paper and from wall-pressure and mass-flux signals measured in the free stream. The characteristic low frequency is in the range of (0.007–0.013) U∞/δ, as found previously. The shock motion also exhibits high-frequency, of O(U∞/δ), small-amplitude spanwise wrinkling, which is mainly caused by the spanwise non-uniformity of turbulent structures in the incoming boundary layer. In studying the low-frequency streamwise oscillation, conditional statistics show that there is no significant difference in the properties of the incoming boundary layer when the shock location is upstream or downstream. The spanwise-mean separation point also undergoes a low-frequency motion and is found to be highly correlated with the shock motion. A small correlation is found between the low-momentum structures in the incoming boundary layer and the separation point. Correlations among the spanwise-mean separation point, reattachment point and the shock location indicate that the low-frequency shock unsteadiness is influenced by the downstream flow. Movies are available with the online version of the paper.

JFM classification

Compressible Flows: Shock waves Turbulent Flows: Turbulent boundary layers
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 594 , 10 January 2008 , pp. 71 - 83
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andreopoulos, J. & Muck, K. C. 1987 Some new aspects of the shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction in compression-ramp flows. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresh, S. J., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2002 Relationship between upstream turbulent boundary-layer velocity fluctuations and separation shock unsteadiness. AIAA J. 40, 2412–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookey, P. B., Wyckham, C., Smits, A. J. & Martin, M. P. 2005 New experimental data of STBLI at DNS/LES accessible Reynolds numbers. AIAA Paper 2005-309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolling, D. S. & Or, C. T. 1985 Unsteadiness of the shock wave structure in attached and separated compression ramp flows. Exp. Fluids 3, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupont, P., Haddad, C. & Debiève, J. F. 2006 Space and time organization in a shock-induced separated boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 559, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dussauge, J. P., Dupont, P. & Debiève, J. F. 2006 Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation. Aerospace Sci. Tech. 10 (2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, J. K. & Johnston, J. P. 1981 Low-frequency unsteadiness of a reattaching turbulent shear layer. In Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Turbulent Shear Flow. Springer.Google Scholar
Erengil, M. E. & Dolling, D. S. 1991 Correlation of separation shock motion with pressure fluctuations in the incoming boundary layer. AIAA J. 29, 1868–1877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2006 Large-scale motions in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 556, 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2007 a Effects of upstream boundary layer on the unsteadiness of shock induced separation. J. Fluid Mech. 585, 369–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganapathisubramani, B., Clemens, N. T. & Dolling, D. S. 2007 b Effects of upstream coherent structures on low-frequency motion of shock-induced turbulent separation. AIAA Paper. 2007-1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gharib, M. & Roshko, A. 1987 The effect of flow oscillations on cavity drag. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 501–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, N. & Marusic, I. 2007 Evidence of very long meandering features in the logarithmic region of turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 579, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, F. K. & Horstmann, C. C. 1972 On the structure of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 53, 611–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirozzoli, S. & Grasso, F. 2006 Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M = 2.25. Phys. Fluids 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotkin, K. J. 1975 Shock wave oscillation driven by turbulent boundary-layer fluctuations. AIAA J. 13, 1036–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringuette, M. J., Wu, M. & Martin, M. P. 2008 Coherent structures in direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layers at Mach 3. J. Fluid Mech. 594, 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, C. W., Colonius, T. & Basu, A. J. 2002 On self-sustained oscillation in two-dimensional compressible flow over rectangular cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 455, 315–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samimy, M., Arnette, S. A. & Elliott, G. S. 1994 Streamwise structures in a turbulent supersonic boundary layer. Phys. Fluids 6, 1081–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selig, M. S. 1988 Unsteadiness of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions with dynamic control. PhD thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. L. 1989 Turbulent boundary-layer separation. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 205–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, F. O., Putnam, C. M. & Chu, H. C. 1994 One the mechanism of unsteady shock oscillation in shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions. Exps. Fluids 18, 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M. & Martin, M. P 2007 Direct numerical simulation of shockwave and turbulent boundary layer interaction induced by a compression Ramp. AIAA J. 45, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P. 2000 MHz-rate pulse-burst laser imaging system: development and application in the high-speed flow diagnostics. PhD thesis, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Wu, P. & Miles, R. B. 2001 Megahertz visualization of compression-corner shock structures. AIAA J. 39, 1542–1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wu and Martin supplementary movie

Movie 1. This movie shows a three-dimensional view of the 24-degree compression ramp interaction with Mach number 3 and Reyonlds number based on the momentum thickness of the incoming boundary layer 2300. Flow is from lower-left to upper-right. Iso-surface of the magnitude of the pressure gradient is shown to visualize the shock. Data rate is 100 kHz (or 1 Uinf/delta, where delta is the incoming boundary layer thickness). The black triangle in the movie is a reference point to see the streamwise shock motion. The relatively high-frequency spanwise wrinkling motion of the shock near the shock foot region and the low-frequency streamwise shock oscillation is seen.

Download Wu and Martin supplementary movie(Video)
Video 8.3 MB

Wu and Martin supplementary movie

Movie 2. This movie shows a plan-view (top-view) of the 24-degree compression ramp interaction with Mach number 3 and Reyonlds number based on the momentum thickness of the incoming boundary layer 2300. The plan is at a wall-normal location of 0.9 delta away from the wall, where delta is the incoming boundary layer thickness. Flow is from left to right. Contours of the magnitude of the pressure gradient is shown to visualize the spanwise wrinkling shock motion. Data rate is 100 kHz (or 1 Uinf/delta). The frequency of the spanwise wrinkling shock motion is seen to be of order 1 Uinf/delta with a magnitude of about 0.5 delta.

Download Wu and Martin supplementary movie(Video)
Video 4.6 MB