Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:13:02.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of low-frequency wave scattering by turbulent premixed flame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2009

JU HYEONG CHO
JU HYEONG CHO*
Affiliation:
School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0150, USA
*
†Present address: Korea Institute of Machinery and Materials, Daejon, Republic of Korea. Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theoretical investigation of acoustic wave interactions with turbulent premixed flames was conducted to evaluate the acoustic energy amplification and/or damping due to the interaction of low-frequency acoustic waves with turbulent flames in three-dimensional space. Such amplified or damped acoustic energy is either coherent or incoherent as wrinkled flames cause coherent energy of a monochromatic acoustic wave to be damped into incoherent energy of spatially diffused and spectrally broadened acoustic waves. Small perturbation method (SPM) up to the second order was utilized to analyse net coherent and incoherent acoustic energies of the reflected and transmitted waves scattered from a weakly wrinkled turbulent flame surface in random motion. General formulations for net coherent and incoherent energy budget of the scattered fields were derived that can be applied to any type of flame height statistics. Production and/or damping of acoustic energy scattered from a turbulent flame is attributed to two effects: one is the acoustic velocity jump due to flame's unsteady heat release and the other is the flame's wrinkling due to its unsteady motion. Dimensionless parameters that govern net acoustic energy budget were derived in case of Gaussian statistics of flame surface behaviour: the r.m.s. and correlation length of flame height, the frequency ratio of the incidence frequency to the flame's correlation frequency, the time ratio of the flame's diffusion to correlation time and the incidence angle. The results of the scattered acoustic energy budget showed that noticeable amplification of acoustic energy was obtained either for a small frequency ratio (≪1) at the critical incidence angle or for a large frequency ratio and time ratio (≫1), while damping was obtained for a small frequency ratio at off-critical incidence angles. The relative importance of unsteady heat release (the jump effect) and unsteady motion (the wrinkling effect) to net acoustic energy is controlled mainly by the frequency ratio: The unsteady heat release effect dominates the wrinkling effect at a large frequency ratio, and vice versa at a small frequency ratio. The energy transfer from coherent to incoherent energy is due to flame surface wrinkling and is enhanced with the square of the flame's r.m.s. height.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 634 , 10 September 2009 , pp. 137 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bloxsidge, G. J., Dowling, A. P., Hooper, N. & Langhorne, P. J. 1998 Active control of reheat buzz. AIAA J. 26 (7), 783–790.Google Scholar
Cho, J. H. 2006 Analysis of the wave scattering from turbulent premixed flame. PhD Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Chu, B. T. 1952 On the generation of pressure waves at a plane flame front. Proc. Combust. Inst. 4, 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, B. T. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1958 Nonlinear interactions in a viscous heat-conducting compressible gas. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 494–514.Google Scholar
Clavin, P., Pelce, P. & He, L. 1990 One-dimensional vibratory instability of planar flames propagating in tubes. J. Fluid Mech. 216, 299–322.Google Scholar
Crighton, D. G., Dowling, A. P., Ffowcs Williams, J. E., Heckl, M. & Leppington, F. G. 1992 Modern Methods in Analytical Acoustics. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleifil, M., Annaswamy, A. M., Ghoniem, Z. A. & Ghoniem, A. F. 1996 Response of a laminar premixed flame to flow oscillations: a kinematic model and thermoacoustic instability results. Combust. Flame 106, 487–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kevorkian, J. 2000 Partial Differential Equations: Analytical Solution Techniques. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ledder, G. & Kapila, A. K. 1991 The response of premixed flames to pressure perturbations. Combust. Sci. Tech. 76, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieuwen, T. 2001 a Theoretical investigation of unsteady flow interactions with a premixed planar flame. J. Fluid Mech. 435, 289–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieuwen, T. 2001 b Theory of high frequency acoustic wave scattering by turbulent flames. Combust. Flame 126 (1-2), 1489–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieuwen, T. 2002 Analysis of acoustic wave interactions with turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 29, 1817–1824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieuwen, T. & Cho, J. H. 2005 Coherent acoustic wave amplification/damping by wrinkled flames. J. Sound Vib. 279, 669–686.Google Scholar
Lieuwen, T., Rajaram, R., Neumeier, Y. & Nair, S. 2002 Measurements of incoherent acoustic wave scattering from turbulent premixed flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 29, 1809–1815.Google Scholar
Lieuwen, T. & Yang, V. 2005 Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines. AIAA, Inc..Google Scholar
Markstein, G. H. 1964 Nonsteady Flame Propagation. Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. 1987 Combustion–acoustic interaction of a flat flame burner system enclosed within an open tube. Combust. Sci. Tech. 54, 217–236.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. 1991 Pressure disturbances of different length scales interacting with conventional flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 75, 287–309.Google Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. 1999 Deflagration fronts and compressibility. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London 357, 3523–3538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, A. C. & Wilce, S. A. 1991 High frequency pressure wave interaction with premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 79, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManus, K. R., Poinsot, T. J. & Candel, S. M. 1993 A review of active control of combustion instabilities. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 19, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meirovitch, L. 1971 Analytical Methods in Vibrations. Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Ogilvy, J. A. 1991 Theory of Wave Scattering from Random Rough Surfaces. IOP Publishing.Google Scholar
Peters, N. & Ludford, G. S. S. 1983 The effect of pressure variations on premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Tech. 34, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. J. & Candel, S. M. 1988 A nonlinear model for ducted flame combustion instabilities. Combust. Sci. Tech. 61, 121–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinsot, T. J., Trouve, A. C., Veynante, D. P., Candel, S. M. & Esposito, E. J. 1987 Vortex-driven acoustically coupled combustion instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, A. A. 1971 Combustion Driven Oscillations in Industry. American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Searby, G. & Clavin, P. 1986 Weakly turbulent, wrinkled flames in premixed gases. Combust. Sci. Tech. 46, 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searby, G. & Rochwerger, D. 1991 A parametric acoustic instability in premixed flames. J. Fluid Mech. 231, 529–543.Google Scholar
Voronovich, A. G. 1999 Wave Scattering from Rough Surfaces. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar