Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:16:32.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An improved model of near-inertial wave dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2019

Olivier Asselin*
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 90293-0213, USA
William R. Young
Affiliation:
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 90293-0213, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The YBJ equation (Young & Ben Jelloul, J. Marine Res., vol. 55, 1997, pp. 735–766) provides a phase-averaged description of the propagation of near-inertial waves (NIWs) through a geostrophic flow. YBJ is obtained via an asymptotic expansion based on the limit $\mathit{Bu}\rightarrow 0$, where $\mathit{Bu}$ is the Burger number of the NIWs. Here we develop an improved version, the YBJ+ equation. In common with an earlier improvement proposed by Thomas, Smith & Bühler (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 817, 2017, pp. 406–438), YBJ+ has a dispersion relation that is second-order accurate in $\mathit{Bu}$. (YBJ is first-order accurate.) Thus both improvements have the same formal justification. But the dispersion relation of YBJ+ is a Padé approximant to the exact dispersion relation and with $\mathit{Bu}$ of order unity this is significantly more accurate than the power-series approximation of Thomas et al. (2017). Moreover, in the limit of high horizontal wavenumber $k\rightarrow \infty$, the wave frequency of YBJ+ asymptotes to twice the inertial frequency $2f$. This enables solution of YBJ+ with explicit time-stepping schemes using a time step determined by stable integration of oscillations with frequency $2f$. Other phase-averaged equations have dispersion relations with frequency increasing as $k^{2}$ (YBJ) or $k^{4}$ (Thomas et al. 2017): in these cases stable integration with an explicit scheme becomes impractical with increasing horizontal resolution. The YBJ+ equation is tested by comparing its numerical solutions with those of the Boussinesq and YBJ equations. In virtually all cases, YBJ+ is more accurate than YBJ. The error, however, does not go rapidly to zero as the Burger number characterizing the initial condition is reduced: advection and refraction by geostrophic eddies reduces in the initial length scale of NIWs so that $\mathit{Bu}$ increases with time. This increase, if unchecked, would destroy the approximation. We show, however, that dispersion limits the damage by confining most of the wave energy to low $\mathit{Bu}$. In other words, advection and refraction by geostrophic flows does not result in a strong transfer of initially near-inertial energy out of the near-inertial frequency band.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2019 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asselin, O., Bartello, P. & Straub, D. N. 2018 On Boussinesq dynamics near the tropopause. J. Atmos. Sci. 75 (2), 571585.Google Scholar
Asselin, R. 1972 Frequency filter for time integrations. Mon. Weath. Rev. 100 (6), 487490.Google Scholar
Danioux, E., Klein, P. & Rivière, P. 2008 Propagation of wind energy into the deep ocean through a fully turbulent mesoscale eddy field. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 38 (10), 22242241.Google Scholar
Danioux, E., Vanneste, J. & Bühler, O. 2015 On the concentration of near-inertial waves in anticyclones. J. Fluid Mech. 773, R2.Google Scholar
D’Asaro, E. A., Eriksen, C. C., Levine, M. D., Paulson, C. A., Niiler, P. P. & Meurs, P. V. 1995 Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I. Data and comparisons with linear theory. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 25, 29092936.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1984 On the behavior of internal waves in the wakes of storms. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 14 (7), 11291151.Google Scholar
Klein, P. & Llewellyn Smith, S. G. 2001 Horizontal dispersion of near-inertial oscillations in a turbulent mesoscale eddy field. J. Mar. Res. 59, 697723.Google Scholar
Klein, P., Llewellyn Smith, S. G. & Lapeyre, G. 2004 Organization of near-inertial energy by an eddy field. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 11531166.Google Scholar
Klein, P. & Treguier, A. M. 1995 Dispersion of wind-induced inertial waves by a barotropic jet. J. Mar. Res. 53 (1), 122.Google Scholar
Kunze, E. 1985 Near inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 15, 544565.Google Scholar
Lee, D.-K. & Niiler, P. P. 1998 The inertial chimney: the near-inertial energy drainage from the ocean surface to the deep layer. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 103 (C4), 75797591.Google Scholar
Mooers, C. N. K. 1975 Several effects of a baroclinic current on the cross-stream propagation of inertial-internal waves. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 245275.Google Scholar
Pollard, R. T. 1980 Properties of near-surface inertial oscillations. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 10 (3), 385398.Google Scholar
Roberts, A. J. 1985 An introduction to the technique of reconstitution. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 16 (6), 12431257.Google Scholar
Rocha, C. B., Wagner, G. L. & Young, W. R. 2018 Stimulated generation: extraction of energy from balanced flow by near-inertial waves. J. Fluid Mech. 847, 417451.Google Scholar
Salmon, R. 2016 Variational treatment of inertia–gravity waves interacting with a quasi-geostrophic mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 809, 502529.Google Scholar
Thomas, J., Smith, K. S. & Bühler, O. 2017 Near-inertial wave dispersion by geostrophic flows. J. Fluid Mech. 817, 406438.Google Scholar
Wagner, G. L. & Young, W. R. 2016 A three-component model for the coupled evolution of near-inertial waves, quasi-geostrophic flow and the near-inertial second harmonic. J. Fluid Mech. 802, 806837.Google Scholar
Xie, J.-H. & Vanneste, J. 2015 A generalised-Lagrangian-mean model of the interactions between near-inertial waves and mean flow. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 143169.Google Scholar
Young, W. R. & Ben Jelloul, M. 1997 Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. J. Mar. Res. 55 (4), 735766.Google Scholar
Zhai, X., Greatbatch, R. J. & Zhao, J. 2005 Enhanced vertical propagation of storm-induced near-inertial energy in an eddying ocean channel model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L18602.Google Scholar