Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-68cz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-14T16:10:37.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental study of sidewall-free steady granular surface flow on a heap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2025

Neiladri Sekhar Ray Open the ORCID record for Neiladri Sekhar Ray [Opens in a new window]  and
Devang Vipin Khakhar Open the ORCID record for Devang Vipin Khakhar [Opens in a new window]
Neiladri Sekhar Ray
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India
Devang Vipin Khakhar*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400076, India
*
Corresponding author: Devang Vipin Khakhar, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Granular surface flows are frequently encountered in nature as well as during handling of powders in different industries. An experimental study of granular surface flow on a heap is carried out. The heap is formed by pouring nearly monodisperse spherical particles from the rectangular slit orifice of a hopper on a rough rectangular plate. A flow of particles is developed on the heap surface, which is planar in the central region, with particles flowing over the edge of the plate into a collection chamber. The geometry considered in this study is an example of a fully three-dimensional heap without side walls. The surface velocities of the particles are measured using high-speed videography and particle tracking velocimetry for different mass flow rates with steel balls and glass beads of two different sizes, for heaps of different aspect ratios. The flow is uni-directional and fully developed in a central zone on the heap surface. The flowing layer thickness is measured in this zone by immersing a soot-coated blade into the flow. The angle of inclination of the free surface of the heap is found to be nearly constant for a ten-fold increase of the mass flow rate. The scaled flowing layer thickness is found to vary linearly with the scaled flow rate and the data for all the particles collapse to a single line over a ten-fold increase in the scaled flow rate and an increase in the aspect ratio of the heap by a factor of 1.75. The predicted scaled surface velocity and scaled shear rate using this correlation match the measured values.

JFM classification

Granular media: Avalanches Granular media: Dry granular material
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 1008 , 10 April 2025 , A38
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Altshuler, E., Ramos, O., Martínez, E., Batista-Leyva, A., Rivera, A. & Bassler, K. 2003 Sandpile formation by revolving rivers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (1), 014501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altshuler, E., Toussaint, R., Martínez, E., Sotolongo-Costa, O., Schmittbuhl, J. & Måløy, K. 2008 Revolving rivers in sandpiles: from continuous to intermittent flows. Phys. Rev. E 77 (3), 031305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouchaud, J.-P., Cates, M.E., Prakash, J. & Edwards, S.F. 1994 A model for the dynamics of sandpile surfaces. Journal de Physique I 4 (10), 1383–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutreux, T., Raphaël, E. & de Gennes, P.-G. 1998 Surface flows of granular materials: a modified picture for thick avalanches. Phys. Rev. E 58 (4), 4692–4700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenouard, N. 2014 Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat. Meth. 11 (3), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douady, S., Andreotti, B. & Daerr, A. 1999 On granular surface flow equations. Eur. Phys. J. B-Condens. Matter Complex Syst. 11 (1), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, Y., Jacob, K.V., Freireich, B. & Lueptow, R.M. 2017 Segregation of granular materials in bounded heap flow: a review. Powder Technol. 312, 67–88.Google Scholar
Fan, Y., Umbanhowar, P.B., Ottino, J.M. & Lueptow, R.M. 2013 Kinematics of monodisperse and bidisperse granular flows in quasi-two-dimensional bounded heaps. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Maths Phys. Engng Sci., 2157, 20130235.Google Scholar
Isner, A.B., Umbanhowar, P.B., Ottino, J.M. & Lueptow, R.M. 2020 a Axisymmetric granular flow on a bounded conical heap: Kinematics and size segregation. Chem. Engng Sci. 217, 115505.Google Scholar
Isner, A.B., Umbanhowar, P.B., Ottino, J.M. & Lueptow, R.M. 2020 b Granular flow in a wedge‐shaped heap: Velocity field, kinematic scalings, and segregation. Aiche J. 66 (5), e16912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jop, P., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2005 Crucial role of sidewalls in granular surface flows: consequences for the rheology. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jop, P., Forterre, Y. & Pouliquen, O. 2006 A constitutive law for dense granular flows. Nature 441 (7094), 727–730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Katsuragi, H., Abate, A. & Durian, D. 2010 Jamming and growth of dynamical heterogeneities versus depth for granular heap flow. Soft Matter 6 (13), 3023–3029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khakhar, D., Orpe, A.V., Andresen, P. & Ottino, J. 2001 Surface flow of granular materials: model and experiments in heap formation. J. Fluid Mech. 441, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komatsu, T.S., Inagaki, S., Nakagawa, N. & Nasuno, S. 2001 Creep motion in a granular pile exhibiting steady surface flow. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (9), 1757–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandal, S. & Khakhar, D. 2019 Granular surface flow on an asymmetric conical heap. J. Fluid Mech. 865, 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez, E., González-Lezcano, A., Batista-Leyva, A. & Altshuler, E. 2016 Exponential velocity profile of granular flows down a confined heap. Phys. Rev. E 93 (6), 062906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, N.S. & Khakhar, D.V. 2021 Dem simulations of quasi-two-dimensional flow of spherical particles on a heap without sidewalls. In EPJ Web of Conferences, vol. 249, pp. 03034, EDP Sciences.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, P., Valance, A., Métayer, J.-F., Sanchez, P., Crassous, J., Louge, M. & Delannay, R. 2008 Rheology of confined granular flows: scale invariance, glass transition, and friction weakening. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (24), 248002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Ryck, A., Zhu, H.P., Wu, S.M., Yu, A.B. & Zulli, P. 2010 Numerical and theoretical investigation of the surface flows of granular materials on heaps. Powder Technol. 203 (2), 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sbalzarini, I.F. & Koumoutsakos, P. 2005 Feature point tracking and trajectory analysis for video imaging in cell biology. J. Struct. Biol. 151 (2), 182–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silbert, L.E., Ertaş, D., Grest, G.S., Halsey, T.C., Levine, D. & Plimpton, S.J. 2001 Granular flow down an inclined plane: Bagnold scaling and rheology. Phys. Rev. E 64 (5), 051302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taberlet, N., Richard, P., Valance, A., Losert, W., Pasini, J.M., Jenkins, J.T. & Delannay, R. 2003 Superstable granular heap in a thin channel. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (26), 264301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ray and Khakhar supplementary material movie

Contour lines during on a heap during flow and after the flow has stopped. During flow, the vertical stream of particles falling from the hopper can be seen. The top view of the contours is seen in the reflection in the mirror at the top of the frame.
Download Ray and Khakhar supplementary material movie(File)
File 55.4 MB