Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:58:33.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An averaged-equation approach to particle interactions in a fluid suspension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2006

E. J. Hinch
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge

Abstract

Earlier ideas are combined to produce a systematic approach both to forming the bulk equations of motion of a dilute suspension and to calculating the overall hydrodynamic interactions between the suspended particles. Equations governing averaged field quantities are derived by taking ensemble averages of the conservation laws and constitutive relations. The bulk equations thus produced contain a term in which the averaging is performed holding one particle fixed. If now the same prescription is applied to fields averaged with one particle fixed, equations are produced containing a term averaged with two particles fixed, and so on up an infinite hierarchy. The hierarchy can be truncated in an asymptotic analysis for small particle concentrations.

This approach to the mechanics of suspensions is illustrated by applying it to three problems which have already been well studied by different methods. The problems concern the first effects of hydrodynamic interactions on the bulk stress and sedimentation velocity of a free suspension, and on the permeability of a fixed bed. Earlier results are recovered in a new light. Multiparticle effects, which before have occurred as divergent sums, are seen to arise because the suspension described by the averaged equations assumes a viscosity and density different from the solvent, or in the case of the fixed bed because the suspension starts behaving as a porous medium instead of as a Newtonian solvent. A close connexion is thus revealed between the averaged-equation description of the interactions and a self-consistent-field model.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1977 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batchelor, G. K. 1970 J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545.
Batchelor, G. K. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 52, 245.
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972a J. Fluid Mech. 56, 401.
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972b J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375.
Brinkman, H. C. 1947 Appl. Sci. Res. A1, 27.
Buyevich, Yu. A. & Markov, V. G. 1973 Prikl. Mat. Mekh. 37, 1059 (translated in J. Appl. Math. Mech. 37, 1005).
Childress, S. 1972 J. Chem. Phys. 56, 2527.
Einstein, A. 1906 Ann. Phys. 19, 289.
Goldman, A. J., Cox, R. G. & Brenner, H. 1966 Chem. Engng Sci. 21, 1151.
Hashin, Z. 1964 Appl. Mech. Rev. 17, 1.
Landau, L. D. & Lifschitz, E. M. 1959 Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon.
Howells, I. D. 1974 J. Fluid Mech. 64, 449.
Lundgren, T. S. 1972 J. Fluid Mech. 51, 273.
Saffman, P. G. 1971 Stud. Appl. Math. 50, 93.
Saffman, P. G. 1973 Stud. Appl. Math. 52, 115.
Tam, C. K. W. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 38, 537.