Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T07:17:09.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An analysis of aerodynamic forces on a delta wing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Chien-Cheng Chang  and
Sheng-Yuan Lei
Chien-Cheng Chang
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10764, Taiwan, Republic of China
Sheng-Yuan Lei
Affiliation:
Institute of Applied Mechanics, College of Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10764, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study aims at relating lift and drag to flow structures around a delta wing of elliptic section. Aerodynamic forces are analysed in terms of fluid elements of non-zero vorticity and density gradient. The flow regime considered is Mα = 0.6 ∼ 1.8 and α = 5° ∼ 19°, where Mα denotes the free-stream Mach number and α the angle of attack. Let ρ denote the density, u velocity, and ω vorticity. It is found that there are two major source elements Re(x) and Ve(x) which contribute about 95% or even more to the aerodynamic forces for all the cases under consideration, \[R_e({\bm x})=-\frac{1}{2} {\bm u}^2 \nabla\rho \cdot \nabla\phi\quad {\rm and}\quad V_e ({\bm x}) = -\rho{\bm u}\times {\bm \omega}\cdot \nabla\phi,\] where θ is an acyclic potential, generated by the delta wing moving with unit velocity in the negative direction of the force (lift or drag). All the physical quantities are non-dimensionalized. Detailed force contributions are analysed in terms of the flow structures and the elements Re(x) and Ve(x). The source elements Re(x) and Ve(x) are concentrated in the following regions: the boundary layer in front of (below) the delta wing, the primary and secondary vortices over the delta wing, and a region of expansion around the leading edge. It is shown that Ve(x) due to vorticity prevails as the source of forces at relatively low Mach number, Mα < 0.7. Above about Mα = 0.75, Re(x) due to compressibility generally becomes the dominating contributor to the lift, while the overall contribution from Ve(x) decreases with increasing Mα, and even becomes negative at Mα = 1.2 for the lift, and at a higher Mα for the drag. The analysis is carried out with the aid of detailed numerical results by solving the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations, which are in close agreement with experiments in comparisons of the surface pressure distributions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 316 , 10 June 1996 , pp. 173 - 196
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, B. S. & Lomax, H. 1978 Thin-layer approximation and algebraic model for separated turbulent flows. AIAA Paper 78–257.
Chang, C. C. 1992 Potential flow and forces for incompressible viscous flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437, 517–525.Google Scholar
Degani, D. & Schiff, L. B. 1986 Computations of turbulent supersonic flows around pointed bodies having crossflow separation. J. Comput. Phys. 66, 173–196.Google Scholar
Gee, K., Cummings, R. M. & Schiff, L. B. 1992 Turbulence model effects on separated flow about a prolate spheroid. AIAA J. 30, 655–664.Google Scholar
Jameson, A. & Yoon, S. 1987 Lower-upper implicit scheme with multiple grids for Euler equations. AIAA J. 25, 929–935.Google Scholar
Lakshminarayana, B. 1986 Turbulence modeling for complex shear flows. AIAA J. 24, 1900–1917.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. 1987 Fluid Mechanics (2nd Edn). Pergamon Press.
Lighthill, M. J. 1986 An Informal Introduction to Theoretical Fluid Mechanics. Oxford University Press.
Marvin, J. G. 1983 Turbulence modeling for computational aerodynamics. AIAA J. 21, 941–955.Google Scholar
McMillin, S. N., Pittman, J. L. & Thomas, J. L. 1990 A computational study of incipient leading-edge separation on a 65° delta wing at M = 1.60. AIAA Paper 90-3029-CP.
Miller, D. S. & Wood, R. M. 1983 An investigation of wing leading-edge vortices at supersonic speeds. AIAA Paper 83-1816.
Newsome, R. W. 1986 Euler and Navier-Stokes solutions for flow over a conical delta wing. AIAA J. 24, 552–561.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1956 The intensity of aeolian tones. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 607–624.Google Scholar
Schrader, K. F., Reynolds, G. A. & Novak, C. J. 1988 Effects of Mach number and Reynolds number on leading-edge vortices at high angle-of-attack. AIAA Paper 88-0172.
Squire, L. C. 1985 Leading-edge separations and cross-flow shocks on delta wings. AIAA J. 23, 321–325.Google Scholar
Stanbrook, A. & Squire, L. C. 1964 Possible types of flow at swept leading edges. Aero. Q. 15, 77–82.Google Scholar
Vladimirov, V. S. 1971 Equations of Mathematical Physics. Marcel Dekker.
White, F. M. 1991 Viscous Fluid Flow (2nd Edn). McGraw-Hill.
Wu, J. C. 1981 Theory for aerodynamic force and moment in viscous flows. AIAA J. 19, 432–441.Google Scholar
Yee, H. C. & Harten, A. 1987 Implicit TVD schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws in curvilinear coordinates. AIAA J. 25, 266–274.Google Scholar
Yokota, J. W. 1990 Diagonally inverted lower-upper factored implicit multigrid scheme for the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations. AIAA J. 28, 1642–1649.Google Scholar