Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T16:00:03.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unstable jet–edge interaction Part 2: Multiple frequency pressure fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Ruhi Kaykayoglu  and
Donald Rockwell
Ruhi Kaykayoglu
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Donald Rockwell
Affiliation:
Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In Part 1 of this investigation we addressed the instantaneous pressure field at a leading-edge due to single frequency jet-edge interactions; here we consider edge pressure fields and associated vortex interaction patterns at the edge having a number of (at least six) well-defined spectral components. Each of the spectral components is present along the entire extent of the approach shear layer upstream of the edge; the relative amplitudes of these components are preserved in the conversion process from the free (approach) shear layer to the surface pressure field, the key link being complex, but ordered patterns of vortex interaction at the edge. Moreover, the predominant spectral components can be reasoned on the basis of these visualized vortex interactions by considering the vortex array in the incident shear layer.

The spectral character of the surface pressure field changes dramatically with edge location in the incident shear layer, or vortex array. If the edge is symmetrically located within the vortex array of the incident jet, a low-frequency component prevails due to large-scale vortex formation; however, with an asymmetrically disposed edge, the most unstable frequency of the jet dominates due to direct vortex impingement upon the edge, and the mean-square pressure amplitude (encompassing all spectral components) is double that of the symmetrical interaction.

Irrespective of the type of interaction and the manner in which energy is partitioned between spectral components, the mean-square pressure due to the sum of all spectral components decays approximately as x−c immediately downstream of the tip of the edge. However, each spectral component tends either to a maximum or minimum amplitude as the tip of the edge is approached, depending upon the class of vortex array-edge interaction.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 169 , August 1986 , pp. 151 - 172
Copyright
© 1986 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Karamcheti, K., Bauer, A. B., Shields, W. L., Stegen, G. R. & Wooley, J. P. 1969 Some features of an edge-tone field. NASA Headquarters Conference, Basic Aeronaut. Noise Research, NASA Special Publication, 207, pp. 275–304.
Kaykayoglu, R. 1984 Interactions of unstable shear layers with leading edges and associated pressure fields. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.
Kaykayoglu, R. & Rockwell, D. 1985 Planar jet—edge interactions: flow mechanisms and instantaneous pressure fields. J. Fluid Mech. 156, 439–461.Google Scholar
Kaykayoglu, R. & Rockwell, D. 1986 Unstable jet—edge interaction. Part 1. Instantaneous pressure fields at a single frequency. J. Fluid Mech. 169, 125–149.Google Scholar
Knisely, C. & Rockwell, D. 1982 Self-sustained low-frequency components in an impinging shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 116, 157–186.Google Scholar
Lucas, M. & Rockwell, D. 1984 Self-excited jet: upstream modulation and multiple frequencies. J. Fluid Mech. 147, 333–352.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. & Criminale, W. O. 1971 Disturbance characteristics in a plane jet. Phys. Fluids 14, 2258–2264.Google Scholar
Michalke, A. 1965 On spatially growing disturbances in an inviscid shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 23, 521–544.Google Scholar
Miksad, R. W. 1972 Experiments on the nonlinear stages of free shear layer transition. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 695–719.Google Scholar
Miksad, R. W. 1973 Experiments on nonlinear interactions in the transition of a free shear layer. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 1–21.Google Scholar
Ohring, S. 1983 Numerical solution of an impinging jet flow problem. Presented at the Fifth GAMM Conference, Rome, October, 1983. David Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center, Maryland.
Powell, A. 1961 On the edgetone. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33, 395–409.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. 1983 Oscillations of impinging shear layers. AIAA J. 21, 645–664.Google Scholar
Rockwell, D. & Naudascher, E. 1979 Self-sustained oscillation of impinging shear layers. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 11, 67–94.Google Scholar
Sondhaus, K. 1854 Über d. beim Austreten d. Luft enstehenden Tone. Annalen der Physik und Chemie 91, 214–240.Google Scholar
Ziada, S. & Rockwell, D. 1982 Vortex-leading edge interaction. J. Fluid Mech. 118, 79–107.Google Scholar