Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T00:48:13.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unique stochastic Lagrangian particle dispersion models for inhomogeneous turbulent flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 September 2021

J.G. Esler
J.G. Esler*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, Gower Street, LondonWC1E 6BT, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well established that Lagrangian particle dispersion models, for inhomogeneous turbulent flows, must satisfy the ‘well-mixed condition’ of Thomson (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 180, 1987, pp. 529–556) in order to produce physically reasonable results. In more than one dimension, however, the well-mixed condition is not sufficient to define the dispersion model uniquely. The non-uniqueness, which is related to the rotational degrees of freedom of particle trajectories, permits models with trajectory curvatures and velocity autocorrelation functions which are clearly unphysical. A spin condition is therefore introduced to constrain the models. It requires an ensemble of particles with fixed initial position and velocity to have, at short times, expected angular momentum, measured relative to the mean position and velocity of an ensemble of fluid particles with initially random velocity, equal to the relative angular momentum of the mean flow at the ensemble mean location. The resulting unique model is found explicitly for the canonical example of inhomogeneous Gaussian turbulence and is characterised by accelerations which are exponential in the particle velocity. A simpler unique model with a quadratic acceleration is obtained using a weaker version of the spin condition. Unlike previous models, the unique models defined by the spin condition lead to particles having the correct (ensemble mean) angular speed in a turbulent flow in solid-body rotation. The properties of the new models are discussed in the settings of a turbulent channel flow and an idealised turbulent atmospheric boundary-layer flow.

JFM classification

Mass Transport: Dispersion Turbulent Flows: Shear layer turbulence
Type
JFM Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 927 , 25 November 2021 , A39
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abe, H. & Antonia, R. 2016 Relationship between the energy dissipation function and the skin friction law in a turbulent channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 798, 140–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnèodo, A., et al. 2008 Universal intermittent properties of particle trajectories in highly turbulent flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 254504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borgas, M., Flesch, T.K. & Sawford, B.L. 1997 Turbulent dispersion with broken reflectional symmetry. J. Fluid Mech. 332, 141–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassiani, M.A., Stohl, A. & Eckhardt, S. 2012 The dispersion characteristics of air pollution from the world's megacities. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 9975–9996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amours, R.A., et al. 2010 Application of the atmospheric Lagrangian particle dispersion model MLDP0 to the 2008 eruptions of Okmok and Kasatochi volcanoes. J. Geophys. Res. 115, D00L11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devenish, B.J., et al. 2011 A study of the arrival over the United Kingdom in April 2010 of the Eyjafjallajokull ash cloud using ground-based lidar and numerical simulations. Atmos. Environ. 48, 152–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esler, J.G. & Ramli, H.M. 2017 Shear dispersion in the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 143, 1721–1733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, C.W. 2009 Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences, 4th edn. Springer, p. 447.Google Scholar
Haworth, D.C. & Pope, S.B. 1986 A generalized Langevin model for turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 29, 387–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monin, A.S. & Yaglom, A.M. 1975 Statistical Fluid Mechanics: Mechanics of Turbulence, vol. 2. MIT Press, p. 657.Google Scholar
Nagib, H.M. & Chauhan, K.A. 2008 Variations of von kármán coefficient in canonical flows. Phys. Fluids 20, 101518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B. 1994 Lagrangian pdf methods for turbulent flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 26, 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent Flows. CUP Cambridge, p. 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A.M. 1998 On trajectory curvature as a selection criterion for valid Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 88, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A.M. 2002 On the dynamical content of Lagrangian stochastic models in the well-mixed class. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 103, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodean, H.C. 1996 Stochastic Lagrangian Models of Turbulent Diffusion. American Meteorological Society, p. 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffman, P.G. 1962 The effect of wind shear on horizontal spread from an instantaneous ground source. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 88, 382–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B.L. 1999 Rotation of trajectories in Lagrangian stochastic models of turbulent dispersion. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 93, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B.L. 2001 Turbulent relative dispersion. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 33, 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawford, B.L. & Guest, F.M. 1988 Uniqueness and universality in Lagrangian stochastic models of turbulent dispersion. In 8th Symposium on Turbulence and Diffusion, pp. 96–99. American Meteorological Society.Google Scholar
Sawford, B.L., Pope, S.B. & Yeung, P.K. 2013 Gaussian lagrangian stochastic models for multi-particle dispersion. Phys. Fluids 25 (5), 055101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seibert, P. & Frank, A. 2004 Source-receptor matrix calculation with a Lagrangian particle dispersion model in backward mode. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P. & Wotawa, G. 2005 Technical note: the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2461–2474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohl, A., Seibert, P. & Wotawa, G. 2012 The total release of xenon-133 from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident. J. Environ. Radioact. 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stohl, A. & Thomson, D.J. 1999 A density correction for Lagrangian particle dispersion models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 90, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stohl, A., et al. 2010 Hydrochlorofluorocarbon and hydrofluorocarbon emissions in East Asia determined by inverse modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 3545–3560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1921 Diffusion by continuous movements. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. s2-20, 196–212.Google Scholar
Taylor, G.I. 1953 Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 219, 186–203.Google Scholar
Thomson, D.J. 1987 Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 529–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D.J. & Wilson, J.D. 2013 History of Lagrangian stochastic models for turbulent dispersion. In Lagrangian Modeling of the Atmosphere (ed. J. Lin, D. Brunner, C. Gerbig, A. Stohl, A. Luhar & P. Webley), pp. 19–36. American Geophysical Union (AGU).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.D. & Flesch, T.K. 1997 Trajectory curvature as a selection criterion for valid Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 84, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar