Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T04:07:56.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-dimensional cusped interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Daniel D. Joseph ,
John Nelson ,
Michael Renardy  and
Yuriko Renardy
Daniel D. Joseph
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, 110 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
John Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics, University of Minnesota, 110 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Michael Renardy
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and ICAM, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0123, USA
Yuriko Renardy
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and ICAM, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0123, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two-dimensional cusped interfaces are line singularities of curvature. We create such cusps by rotating a cylinder half immersed in liquid. A liquid film is dragged out of the reservoir on one side and is plunged in at the other, where it forms a cusp at finite speeds, if the conditions are right. Both Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluids form cusps, but the transition from a rounded interface to a cusp is gradual in Newtonian liquids and sudden in non-Newtonian liquids. We present an asymptotic analysis near the cusp tip for the case of zero surface tension, and we make some remarks about the effects of a small surface tension. We also present the results of numerical simulations showing the development of a cusp. In those simulations, the fluid is filling an initially rectangular domain with a free surface on top. The fluid enters from both sides and is sucked out through a hole in the bottom.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 223 , February 1991 , pp. 383 - 409
Copyright
© 1991 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acrivos, A. & Lo, T. S., 1978 Deformation and breakup of a single slender drop in an extensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 86, 641–672.Google Scholar
Astarita, G. & Apuzzo, G., 1965 Motion of gas bubbles in non-Newtonian liquids. AIChE J. 11, 815–820.Google Scholar
Barnett, S. R., Humphrey, A. E. & Litt, M., 1966 Bubble motion and mass transfer in non-Newtonian fluids. AIChE J. 12, 253–259.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J. D.: 1972 Pointed bubbles in slow viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 385–400.Google Scholar
Buckmaster, J. D.: 1973 The bursting of pointed drops in slow viscous flow. Trans. ASME E; J. Appl. Mech. 40, 18–24.Google Scholar
Calderbank, P. H.: 1967 Review Series No. 3 – Gas absorption from bubbles. Trans. Inst. Chem. Engrs 45, 209–220.Google Scholar
Calderbank, P. H., Johnson, D. S. & Loudon, J., 1970 Mechanics and mass transfer of single bubbles in free rise through some Newtonian and non-Newtonian liquids. Chem. Engng Sci. 5, 235–256.Google Scholar
Davies, A. R.: 1988 Reentrant corner singularities in non-Newtonian flow. Part I. Theory. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 29, 269–293.Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. & Montagnon, P. E., 1949 On the steady motion of viscous liquid in a corner. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45, 389–394.Google Scholar
Dussan, V. E.: 1976 The moving contact line: the slip boundary condition. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 665–684.Google Scholar
Engelman, M. S. & Sani, R. I., 1986 Finite element simulation of incompressible fluid flows with a free/moving surface. In Computational Techniques for Fluid Flow (ed. C. Taylor, J. A. Johnson & W. R. Smith), pp. 47–74. Swansea: Pineridge.
de Gennes, P. G.: 1985 Wetting: static and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 827–863.Google Scholar
Grace, J. P.: 1971 Dispersion phenomena in high viscosity immiscible fluid systems and application of static mixers as dispersion devices in such systems. Engng Found. 3rd Res. Congr. on Mixing, Andover, New Hampshire.Google Scholar
Hassager, O.: 1985 The motion of viscoelastic fluids around spheres and bubbles. In Viscoelasticity and Rheology (ed. A. S. Lodge, M. Renardy & J. A. Nohel), pp. 1–11. Academic.
Hinch, E. J. & Acrivos, A., 1979 Steady long slender droplets in two-dimensional straining motion. J. Fluid Mech. 91, 401–414.Google Scholar
Huh, C. & Scriven, L. E., 1971 Hydrodynamic model of steady movement of a solid/liquid/fluid contact line. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 35, 85–101.Google Scholar
Joseph, D. D., Nguyen, K. & Beavers, G. S., 1984 Non-uniqueness and stability of the configuration of flow of immiscible fluids with different viscosities. J. Fluid Mech. 141, 319–345.Google Scholar
Koplik, J., Banavar, J. R. & Willemsen, J. F., 1988 Molecular dynamics of Poiseuille flow and moving contact lines. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1282–1285.Google Scholar
Lamb, H.: 1932 Hydrodynamics. Dover.
Leal, L. G., Skoog, J. & Acrivos, A., 1971 On the motion of gas bubbles in a viscoelastic liquid. Can. J. Chem. Engng 49, 569–575.Google Scholar
Lister, J. R.: 1989 Selective withdrawal from a viscous two-layer system. J. Fluid Mech. 198, 231–254.Google Scholar
Mhatre, M. V. & Kintner, R. C., 1959 Fall of liquids drops through pseudoplastic liquids. Ind. Engng Chem., 51, 865–867.Google Scholar
Michael, H. D.: 1958 The separation of a viscous liquid at a straight edge. Mathematika 5, 82–84.Google Scholar
Philippoff, W.: 1937 The viscosity characteristics of rubber solutions. Rubb. Chem. Technol. 10, 76–104.Google Scholar
Rallison, J. M. & Acrivos, A., 1978 A numerical study of the deformation and burst of a viscous drop in an extensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 191–200.Google Scholar
Rayleigh, Lord: 1890 On the theory of surface forces. Phil. Mag. 34, (5), 285–298 and 456–475.Google Scholar
Richardson, S.: 1968 Two dimensional bubbles in slow flow. J. Fluid Mech. 33, 475–493.Google Scholar
Rumscheidt, F. D. & Mason, S. G., 1961 Particle motion in sheared suspensions. XII. Deformation and burst of fluid drops in shear and hyperbolic flow. J. Colloid. Sci. 16, 238–261.Google Scholar
Sherwood, J. D.: 1981 Spindle shaped drops in a viscous extensional flow. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 90, 529–536.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I.: 1934 The formation of emulsions in definable fields of flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 146, 501–523.Google Scholar
Taylor, G. I.: 1964 Conical free surfaces and fluid interfaces. Proc. 11th Intl Congr. Appl. Mech., Munich.Google Scholar
Thompson, P. A. & Robbins, M. O., 1989 Simulations of contact-line motion: slip and the dynamics of contact. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 766–769.Google Scholar
Warshay, M. E., Bogusz, E., Johnson, M. & Kintner, R. C., 1959 Ultimate velocity of drops in stationary liquid media. Can. J. Chem. Engng 37, 29–36.Google Scholar
Zana, E. & Leal, L. G., 1978 The dynamics and dissolution of gas bubbles in a viscoelastic fluid. Intl J. Multiphase Flow 4, 237–262.Google Scholar