Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T05:47:40.300Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

S. E. Belcher  and
J. C. R. Hunt
S. E. Belcher
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK
J. C. R. Hunt
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Silver Street, Cambridge, CB3 9EW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigate the changes to a fully developed turbulent boundary layer caused by the presence of a two-dimensional moving wave of wavelength L = 2π/k and amplitude a. Attention is focused on small slopes, ak, and small wave speeds, c, so that the linear perturbations are calculated as asymptotic sequences in the limit (u* + c)/UB(L) → 0 (u* is the unperturbed friction velocity and UB(L) is the approach-flow mean velocity at height L). The perturbations can then be described by an extension of the four-layer asymptotic structure developed by Hunt, Leibovich & Richards (1988) to calculate the changes to a boundary layer passing over a low hill.

When (u* + c)/UB(L) is small, the matched height, zm (the height where UB equals c), lies within an inner surface layer, where the perturbation Reynolds shear stress varies only slowly. Solutions across the matched height are then constructed by considering an equation for the shear stress. The importance of the shear-stress perturbation at the matched height implies that the inviscid theory of Miles (1957) is inappropriate in this parameter range. The perturbations above the inner surface layer are not directly influenced by the matched height and the region of reversed flow below zm: they are similar to the perturbations due to a static undulation, but the ‘effective roughness length’ that determines the shape of the unperturbed velocity profile is modified to zm = z0 exp (kc/u*).

The solutions for the perturbations to the boundary layer are used to calculate the growth rate of waves, which is determined at leading order by the asymmetric pressure perturbation induced by the thickening of the perturbed boundary layer on the leeside of the wave crest. At first order in (u* + c)/UB(L), however, there are three new effects which, numerically, contribute significantly to the growth rate, namely: the asymmetries in both the normal and shear Reynolds stresses associated with the leeside thickening of the boundary layer, and asymmetric perturbations induced by the varying surface velocity associated with the fluid motion in the wave; further asymmetries induced by the variation in the surface roughness along the wave may also be important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 251 , June 1993 , pp. 109 - 148
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. R. 1972 A Handbook of Mathematical Functions. Dover.
Al-Zanaidi, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1984 Turbulent air flow over water waves - a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 225–246.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E. 1990 Turbulent boundary layer flow over undulating surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge.
Belcher, S. E., Newley, T. M. J. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 The drag on an undulating surface due to the flow of a turbulent layer. J. Fluid Mech. 249 557–596 (referred to herein as BNH).Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E., Xu, D. P. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1990 The response of a turbulent boundary layer to arbitrarily distributed two-dimensional roughness changes. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 116, 611–635.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1959 Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161–205.Google Scholar
Britter, R. E., Hunt, J. C. R. & Richards, K. J. 1981 Air flow over a 2-d hill: studies of velocity speed-up, roughness effects and turbulence. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 107, 91–110.Google Scholar
Charnock, H. 1955 Wind stress on a water surface. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 81, 639.Google Scholar
Cheung, T. K. & Street, R. L. 1988 The turbulent layer in the water at an air-water interface. J. Fluid Mech. 194, 133–151.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1972 Perturbed turbulent flow, eddy viscosity and the generation of turbulent stresses. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 673–693.Google Scholar
Duin, C. A. van & Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1992 An analytical model of the generation of surface gravity waves by turbulent air flow. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 197–215.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. & Taylor, P. A. 1976 A numerical model of air-flow above water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 105–128.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. 1992 On the growth of water waves and the motions beneath them. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Hunt, J. C. R. 1973 A theory of turbulent flow round two-dimensional bluff bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 61, 625–706.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. C. R., Leibovich, S. & Richards, K. J. 1988 Turbulent shear flows over low hills. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 114 1435–1471 (referred to herein as HLR).Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-T., Hsu, E.-Y. & Street, R. L. 1981 On the structure of turbulent flow over a progressive water wave: theory and experiment in a transformed, wave-following coordinate system. J. Fluid Mech. 105, 87–117.Google Scholar
Hsu, C.-T., Wu, H.-Y., Hsu, E.-Y. & Street, R. L. 1982 Momentum and energy transfer in wind generation of waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 12, 929–951.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S. J. 1987 An asymptotic theory for the turbulent flow over a progressive wave. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 69–80.Google Scholar
Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1982 Quasilinear approximation for the spectrum of wind generated ocean waves. J. Fluid Mech. 48, 91–127.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, H. 1925 On the formation of water waves by wind. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 107, 189–206.Google Scholar
Kendall, J. M. 1970 The turbulent boundary layer over a wall with progressive surface waves. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 259–281.Google Scholar
Kinsman, B. 1984 Wind Waves: Their Generation and Propagation on the Ocean Surface. Dover.
Lighthill, M. J. 1962 Physical interpretation of the theory of wind generated waves. J. Fluid Mech. 14, 385–397.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1978 Waves in Fluids. Cambridge University Press.
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. 1969 Action of a variable stress at the surface of water waves. Phys. Fluids 12, 737–740.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Cokelet, E. D. 1976 The deformation of steep surface waves. I. A numerical method of computation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 350, 1–26.Google Scholar
Longuet-Higgins, M. S. & Stewart, R. W. 1960 Changes in the form of short gravity waves on long waves and tidal currents. J. Fluid Mech. 8, 565–583.Google Scholar
Mason, P. J. & King, J. C. 1985 Measurements and predictions of flow and turbulence over an isolated hill of low slope. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 111, 617–640.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185–204.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1967 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 5. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 163–175.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1957 On the generation of waves by a turbulent wind. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 417–445.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1977 Dynamics of the Upper Ocean. Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, O. M. & Banner, M. L. 1974 Wave breaking in the presence of wind drift and swell. J. Fluid Mech. 66, 625–640.Google Scholar
Plant, W. J. 1984 A relationship between wind shear stress and wave slope. J. Geophys. Res. 87, C3, 1961–1967.Google Scholar
Ramamonjiarisoa, A. 1974 Contribution a 1’étude de la structure statistique et des mechanismes de génération des vagues de vent. Thesis, Universitié de Provence (also IMST no. AO 10023).
Smith, F. T., Brighton, P. M. W., Jackson, P. S. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1981 On boundary layer flow past two dimensional bodies. J. Fluid Mech. 113, 123–152.Google Scholar
Snyder, R. L., Dobson, F. W., Elliot, J. A. & Long, R. B. 1981 Array measurements of atmospheric pressure fluctuations above gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 102, 1–59.Google Scholar
Stewart, R. W. 1969 Mechanics of the air sea interface. Phys. Fluids Suppl. 10, 547–554.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. I. 1980 An asymptotic theory of incompressible turbulent flow over a small hump. J. Fluid Mech. 101, 647–670.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1965 Self-preserving flow inside a turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 773–797.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1972 Flow in a deep turbulent boundary layer over a surface distorted by water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719–735.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1980 Sheared turbulence and additional distortion. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 171–191.Google Scholar
Walmsey, J. L., Taylor, P. A. & Keith, Y. 1986 A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary layer flow over complex terrain with surface roughness modulation. Boundary-Layer Met. 36, 157–186.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 1968 Laboratory studies of wind-wave interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 34, 91–112.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 1975 Wind-induced drift currents. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 49–70.Google Scholar
Wu, J. 1979 Distribution and steepness of ripples on carrier waves. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 9, 1014–1021.Google Scholar
Zeman, O. & Jenssen, N. O. 1987 Modification to turbulence characteristics in flow over hills. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 113, 55–80.Google Scholar