Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T15:19:34.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transition through Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities in a breaking internal lee wave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Sergey N. Yakovenko ,
T. Glyn Thomas  and
Ian P. Castro
Sergey N. Yakovenko
Affiliation:
Khristianovich Institute of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia Aeronautics and Astronautics, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
T. Glyn Thomas
Affiliation:
Aeronautics and Astronautics, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
Ian P. Castro*
Affiliation:
Aeronautics and Astronautics, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Results of direct numerical simulations of the transitional processes that characterise the evolution of a breaking internal gravity wave to a fully developed and essentially steady turbulent patch are presented. The stationary lee wave was forced by the imposition of an appropriate bottom boundary shape within a density-stratified domain having a uniform upstream velocity and density gradient, and with the ratio of momentum to thermal (or other) diffusivity defined by $\mathit{Pr}=1$. An earlier paper considered the eventual, fully developed turbulent patch arising after the breaking process is complete (Yakovenko et al., J. Fluid Mech., vol. 677, 2011, pp. 103–133); the focus in this paper is on the instabilities in the breaking process itself. The flow is analysed using streamlines, density contours and temporal and spatial spectra, as well as second moments of the velocity and density fluctuations, for a Reynolds number of 4000 based on the height of the bottom topography and the upstream velocity. The computations (on a grid using in excess of $10^{9}$ mesh points) yielded sufficient resolution to capture the fine-scale transition processes as well as the subsequent fully developed turbulence discussed earlier. It is shown that the major instability is of Rayleigh–Taylor type (RTI) with a resulting mixing region depth growing in a manner consistent with more classical RTI studies, despite the much more complicated environment. The resolution was sufficient to capture secondary Kelvin–Helmholtz-type instabilities on the developing RTI structures. Overall evolution towards the fully turbulent state characterised by a significant region of $-\frac{5}{3}$ subrange in both velocity and density spectra is very rapid. It is much faster than the long time scale characterising the subsequent evolution of the turbulent patch; this latter time scale is sufficiently large that the turbulent patch can itself be viewed as essentially steady.

JFM classification

Geophysical and Geological Flows: Stratified flows Geophysical and Geological Flows: Topographic effects Instability: Transition to turbulence
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 760 , 10 December 2014 , pp. 466 - 493
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2014 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abarzhi, S. I. 2010 Review of theoretical modelling approaches of Rayleigh–Taylor instabilities and turbulent mixing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 368, 1809–1828.Google ScholarPubMed
Afanasyev, Y. D. & Peltier, W. R. 1998 The three-dimensionalisation of stratified flow over two-dimensional orography. J. Atmos. Sci. 55, 19–39.Google Scholar
Andreassen, O., Hvidsten, P. O., Fritts, D. C. & Arendt, S. 1998 Vorticity dynamics in a breaking internal gravity wave. Part 1. Initial instability evolution. J. Fluid Mech. 367, 27–46.Google Scholar
Andreassen, Ø., Wasberg, C. E., Fritts, D. C. & Isler, J. R. 1994 Gravity wave breaking in two and three dimensions. 1. Model description and comparison of two-dimensional evolutions. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 8095–8108.Google Scholar
Barad, M. F. & Fringer, O. B. 2010 Simulations of shear instabilities in interfacial gravity waves. J. Fluid Mech. 644, 61–95.Google Scholar
Barri, M., El Khoury, G. K., Andersson, H. I. & Petterson, B. 2010 DNS of backward-facing step flow with fully turbulent inflow. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 64, 777–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, I. P. & Snyder, W. H. 1993 Experiments on wave breaking in stratified flow over obstacles. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 195–211.Google Scholar
Cook, A. W., Cabot, W. & Miller, P. L. 2004 The mixing transition in Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 511, 333–362.Google Scholar
Dalziel, S. B., Linden, P. F. & Youngs, D. L. 1999 Self-similarity and internal structure of turbulence induced by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. J. Fluid Mech. 399, 1–48.Google Scholar
Dimonte, G. & Schneider, M. 2000 Density ratio dependence of Rayleigh–Taylor mixing for sustained and impulsive acceleration histories. Phys. Fluids 12, 304–321.Google Scholar
Eiff, O. F. & Bonneton, P. 2000 Lee-wave breaking over obstacles in stratified flow. Phys. Fluids 12, 1073–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eiff, O., Huteau, F. & Tolu, J. 2005 High Reynolds-number orographic wave-breaking experiments. Dyn. Atmos. Oceans 40, 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freed, N., Ofer, D., Shvarts, D. & Orszag, S. O. 1991 Two-phase flow analysis of self-similar turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Phys. Fluids 3, 912–918.Google Scholar
Fringer, O. B. & Street, R. L. 2003 The dynamics of breaking progressive interfacial waves. J. Fluid Mech. 494, 319–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritts, D. C., Bizon, C., Werne, J. A. & Meyer, C. K. 2003 Layering accompanying turbulence generation due to shear instability and gravity-wave breaking. J. Geophys. Res. 108 (D8), 8452.Google Scholar
Fritts, D. C. & Garten, J. F. 1996 Wave breaking and transition to turbulence in stratified shear flows. J. Atmos. Sci. 53, 1057–1085.Google Scholar
Fritts, D. C., Isler, J. R. & Andreassen, O. 1994 Gravity wave breaking in two and three dimensions. 2. Three-dimensional evolution and instability structure. J. Geophys. Res. 99 (D4), 8109–8123.Google Scholar
Fritts, D. C., Wang, L., Werne, J., Lund, T. & Wan, K. 2009 Gravity wave instability dynamics at high Reynolds numbers. Part I. Wave field evolution at large amplitudes and high frequencies. J. Atmos. Sci. 66, 1126–1148.Google Scholar
Gheusi, F., Stein, J. & Eiff, O. F. 2000 A numerical study of three-dimensional orographic gravity-wave breaking observed in a hydraulic tank. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 67–99.Google Scholar
Kim, J., Moin, P. & Moser, R. 1987 Turbulence statistics in fully developed turbulent channel flow at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 177, 133–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leweke, T. & Williamson, C. H. K. 1998 Cooperative elliptic instability of a vortex pair. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 85–119.Google Scholar
Liu, W., Bretherton, F. P., Liu, Z., Smith, L., Lu, H. & Rutland, C. J. 2010 Breaking of progressive internal gravity waves: convective instability and shear instability. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 40, 2243–2263.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012a The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 1. Shear aligned convection, pairing and braid instabilities. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 5–44.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2012b The ‘zoo’ of secondary instabilities precursory to stratified shear flow transition. Part 2. The influence of stratification. J. Fluid Mech. 708, 45–70.Google Scholar
Mashayek, A. & Peltier, W. R. 2013 Shear-induced mixing in geophysical flows: does the route to turbulence matter to its efficiency? J. Fluid Mech. 725, 216–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, G. I. 1950 The instability of liquid surfaces when accelerated in a direction perpendicular to their planes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 201, 192–196.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. G. & Williams, J. J. R. 1997 Development of a parallel code to simulate skewed flow over a bluff body. J. Wind Engng Ind. Aerodyn. 67–68, 155–167.Google Scholar
Troy, C. D. & Koseff, J. R. 2005 The instability and breaking of long internal waves. J. Fluid Mech. 543, 107–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voropayev, S. I., Afanasyev, Y. D. & van Heijst, G. J. F. 1993 Experiments on the evolution of gravitational instability of an overturned, initially stably stratified fluid. Phys. Fluids A 5, 2461–2466.Google Scholar
Yakovenko, S. N., Thomas, T. G. & Castro, I. P. 2011 A turbulent patch arising from a breaking internal wave. J. Fluid Mech. 677, 103–133.Google Scholar
Yakovenko, S. N., Thomas, T. G. & Castro, I. P. 2014 On sub-grid-scale model implementation for a lee-wave turbulent patch in a stratified flow above an obstacle. In Progress in Turbulence V (Proceedings of the iTi Conference in Turbulence, 2012) (ed. Talamelli, A. et al. ), Proceedings in Physics, vol. 149, pp. 233–236. Springer.Google Scholar
Youngs, D. L. 1984 Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh–Taylor instability. Physica D 12, 32–44.Google Scholar