Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:53:34.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surface-wave generation revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

John Miles
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The quasi-laminar model for the transfer of energy to a surface wave from a turbulent shear flow (Miles 1957) is modified to incorporate the wave-induced perturbations of the Reynolds stresses, which are related to the wave-induced velocity field through the Boussinesq closure hypothesis and the ancillary hypothesis that the eddy viscosity is conserved along streamlines. It is assumed that the basic mean velocity is U(z) = (U*/κ)log(z/z0) for sufficiently large z (elevation above the level interface) and that U(z1) [Gt ] U* for kz1 = O(1), where k is the wavenumber. The resulting vorticity-transport equation is reduced, through the neglect of diffusion, to a modification of Rayleigh's equation for wave motion in an inviscid shear flow. The energy transfer to the surface wave, which comprises independent contributions from the critical layer (where U = c, the wave speed) and the wave-induced Reynolds stresses, is calculated through a variational approximation and, independently, through matched asymptotic expansions. The critical-layer component is equivalent to that for the quasi-laminar model. The Reynolds-stress component is similar to, but differs quantitatively from, that obtained by Knight (1977, Jacobs (1987) and van Duin & Janssen (1992). The predicted energy transfer agrees with the observational data compiled by Plant (1982) for 1 [lsim ] c/U* [lsim ] 20, but the validity of the logarithmic profile for the calculation of the energy transfer in the critical layer for c/U* < 5 remains uncertain. The basic model is unreliable (for water waves) if c/U* [lsim ] 1, but this domain is of limited oceanographic importance. It is suggested that Kelvin–Helmholtz instability of air blowing over oil should provide a good experimental test of the present Reynolds-stress modelling and that this modelling may be relevant in other geophysical contexts.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 256 , November 1993 , pp. 427 - 441
Copyright
© 1993 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. 1964 Handbook of Mathematical Functions. US National Bureau of Standards.
Al-Zanaidi, M. A. & Hui, W. H. 1984 Turbulent airflow over water waves – a numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 148, 225–246.Google Scholar
Belcher, S. E. & Hunt, J. C. R. 1993 Turbulent shear flow over slowly moving waves. J. Fluid Mech. 251, 109–148.Google Scholar
Benjamin, T. B. 1959 Shearing flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 161–205.Google Scholar
Boussinesq, J. 1877 Essai sur la théorie des eaux courantes. Mém. Prés. Par Div. Savants à l’Acad. Sci. Paris 23, 46.Google Scholar
Chalikov, D. V. 1976 A mathematical model of wind-induced waves. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 229, 1083–1086 (cited by Chalikov 1978.)Google Scholar
Chalikov, D. V. 1978 The numerical simulation of wind-wave interaction. F. Fluid Mech. 87, 561–582.Google Scholar
Charnock, H. 1955 Wind stress on a water surface. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 81, 639–640.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1970 On the turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 42, 721–731.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1972 On prediction of the turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. J. Fluid Mech. 52, 287–306.Google Scholar
Davis, R. E. 1974 Perturbed turbulent flow, eddy viscosity and generation of turbulent stresses. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 673–693.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambridge University Press.
Duin, C. A. van & Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1992 An analytic model of the generation of surface gravity waves by turbulent air flow. J. Fluid Mech. 236, 197–215.Google Scholar
Francis, J. R. D. 1954 Wave motion and the aerodynamic drag on a free oil surface. Phil. Mag. (7) 45, 695–702.
Gent, P. R. 1977 A numerical model of the air flow above water waves. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 82, 349–369.Google Scholar
Gent, P. R. & Taylor, P. A. 1976 A numerical model of the air flow above water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 77, 105–128.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (Ed.) 1938 Modern Developments in Fluid Dynamics. Oxford University Press.
Jacobs, S. J. 1987 An asymptotic theory for the turbulent flow over a progressive water wave. J. Fluid Mech. 174, 69–80.Google Scholar
Janssen, P. A. E. M. 1986 On the effect of gustiness on wave growth. (Internal memorandum of KNMI, DeBilt.)
Jones, W. P. & Launder, B. E. 1972 The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. J. Heat Mass Transfer 15, 301–314.Google Scholar
Knight, D. 1977 Turbulent flow over a wavy boundary. Boundary-Layer Met. 11, 209–222.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1932 Hydrodynamics. Cambridge University Press.
Lighthill, M. J. 1957 The fundamental solution for small steady three-dimensional disturbances in a two-dimensional parallel shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 113–144.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1957 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 3, 185–204 (referred to herein as I.)Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1959a On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 2. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 568–582.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1959b On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 3. J. Fluid Mech. 6, 583–598.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1960 On the generation of surface waves by turbulent shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 7, 469–478.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1961 On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows. J. Fluid Mech. 10, 496–508.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1962 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 4. J. Fluid Mech. 13, 433–438.Google Scholar
Miles, J. W. 1967 On the generation of surface waves by shear flows. Part 5. J. Fluid Mech. 30, 163–175.Google Scholar
Nee, V. W. & Kovasznay, L. S. G. 1969 Simple phenomenological theory of turbulent flows. Phys. Fluids 12, 473–484.Google Scholar
Nikolayeva, Y. I. & Tsimring, L. S. 1986 Kinetic model of the wind generation of waves by a turbulent wind. Izv. Acad. Sci. USSR, Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 22, 102–107.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1957 On the generation of waves by turbulent wind. J. Fluid Mech. 2, 417–445.Google Scholar
Phillips, O. M. 1977 The Dynamics of the Upper Ocean, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.
Plant, W. J. 1982 A relationship between wind stress and wave slope. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 1961–1967.Google Scholar
Riley, D. S. & Donelan, M. A. 1982 An extended Miles’ theory for wave generation by wind. Boundary-Layer Met. 22, 209–225.Google Scholar
Saffman, P. G. 1970 A model for inhomogeneous turbulent flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 317, 417–433.Google Scholar
Spalart, P. R. & Allmaras, S. R. 1992 A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA Preprint 92–0439.
SWAMP Group 1985 Ocean Wave Modelling. Plenum.
Townsend, A. A. 1972 Flow in a deep turbulent boundary layer over a surface distorted by water waves. J. Fluid Mech. 55, 719–735.Google Scholar