Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T08:47:15.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sub-representative elementary volume homogenization of flow in porous media with isolated embedded fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2020

Patrick Jenny*
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Sonneggstrasse 3, 8092Zurich, Switzerland
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper deals with homogenization of flow in porous media with large inhomogeneities. Classical homogenization relies on representative elementary volumes (REV) large enough that asymptotic macroscopic parameters, e.g. effective permeabilities, can be employed to describe the expected or mean behaviour. In this way, Darcy's law, which describes the relationship between macroscopic pressure gradient and volumetric flow rate, was derived. In the presence of large features, however, the required REV size may reach the same order as the geometric reference scale of the problem, and thus effective permeabilities obtained from classical homogenization studies may be unsuited. This is in particular the case for reservoirs with isolated, highly conductive fractures. To see this, consider flow from left to right through a block of finite size. If the latter is small enough, such that some fractures are connected to both left and right boundaries, then the resulting flow will be larger for the same average pressure gradient than through a wider block. In this paper, a new sub-REV continuum model to describe this pre-asymptotic flow behaviour is presented. The model relies on a non-local multi-media description based on coupled integral–differential equations. The only empirical information required for calibration is the effective permeability of an infinitely large domain, e.g. as obtained from classical homogenization. With a series of numerical studies and comparison with Monte Carlo reference data it is demonstrated that the devised sub-REV model accurately captures mean flow rates and pressure profiles for arbitrary domain sizes.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barenblatt, G. I., Zheltov, Iu. P. & Kochina, I. N. 1960 Basic concepts in the theory of seepage of homogeneous liquids in fissured rocks [strata]. J. Appl. Math. Mech. 24 (5), 12861303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berre, I., Doster, F. & Keilegavlen, E. 2018 Flow in fractured porous media: a review of conceptual models and discretization approaches. Transp. Porous Med. 130 (1), 215236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhary, A. S., Ehlig-Economides, C. A. & Wattenbarger, R. A. 2011 Shale oil production performance from a stimulated reservoir volume. In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, E. T., Efendiev, Y., Leung, W. T., Vasilyeva, M. & Wang, Y. 2018 Non-local multi-continua upscaling for flows in heterogeneous fractured media. J. Comput. Phys. 372, 2234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemo, T. & Smith, L. 1997 A hierarchical model for solute transport in fractured media. Water Resour. Res. 33 (8), 17631783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coumou, D., Matthäi, S., Geiger, S. & Driesner, T. 2008 A parallel FE–FV scheme to solve fluid flow in complex geologic media. Comput. Geosci. 34 (12), 16971707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, R. & Jenny, P. 2017 a Finite volume-based modeling of flow-induced shear failure along fracture manifolds. Intl J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 41 (18), 19221942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deb, R. & Jenny, P. 2017 b Modeling of shear failure in fractured reservoirs with a porous matrix. Comput. Geosci. 21 (5–6), 11191134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delgoshaie, A. H., Meyer, D. W., Jenny, P. & Tchelepi, H. A. 2015 Non-local formulation for multiscale flow in porous media. J. Hydrol. 531, 649654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlofsky, L. J. 1991 Numerical calculation of equivalent grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media. Water Resour. Res. 27 (5), 699708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, P., Settgast, R. R., Hao, Y., Morris, J. P. & Ryerson, F. J. 2017 The influence of hydraulic fracturing on carbon storage performance. J. Geophys. Res. 122 (12), 99319949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, M. B. 2008 Multilevel Monte Carlo path simulation. Oper. Res. 56 (3), 607617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajibeygi, H., Karvounis, D. & Jenny, P. 2011 a A hierarchical fracture model for the iterative multiscale finite volume method. J. Comput. Phys. 230 (24), 87298743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajibeygi, H., Karvounis, D. & Jenny, P. 2011 b A loosely coupled hierarchical fracture model for the iterative multiscale finite volume method. In Proceedings of Reservoir Simulation Symposium (SPE 141991-PP). Society of Petroleum Engineering.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, S. 2001 Multilevel Monte Carlo methods. In Large-Scale Scientific Computing, pp. 58–67. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, P. & Meyer, D. W. 2017 Non-local generalization of Darcy's law based on empirically extracted conductivity kernels. Comput. Geosci. 21 (5–6), 12811288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimi-Fard, M., Durlofsky, L. J. & Aziz, K. 2004 An efficient discrete-fracture model applicable for general-purpose reservoir simulators. SPE J. 9 (02), 227236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimi-Fard, M., Gong, B. & Durlofsky, L. J. 2006 Generation of coarse-scale continuum flow models from detailed fracture characterizations. Water Resour. Res. 42 (10), 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karvounis, D. & Jenny, P. 2016 Adaptive hierarchical fracture model for enhanced geothermal systems. SIAM J. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14 (1), 207231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S. H., Lough, M. F. & Jensen, C. L. 2001 Hierarchical modeling of flow in naturally fractured formations with multiple length scales. Water Resour. Res. 37 (3), 443455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, L. & Lee, S. H. 2008 Efficient field-scale simulation of black oil in a naturally fractured reservoir through discrete fracture networks and homogenized media. SPE Reservoir Eval. Engng 11 (04), 750758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maclay, R. W. 1995 Geology and hydrology of the Edwards aquifer in the San Antonio area, Texas. Water-Resources Investigations Rep. 95-4186. Prepared in cooperation with the San Antonio Water System.Google Scholar
Matthai, S., Mezentsev, A. & Belayneh, M. 2007 a Finite elementnode-centered finite-volume two-phase-flow experiments with fractured rock represented by unstructured hybrid-element meshes. SPE Reservoir Eval. Engng 10 (6), 740756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthäi, S. K. & Belayneh, M. 2004 Fluid flow partitioning between fractures and a permeable rock matrix. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31 (7).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthai, S. K., Geiger, S., Roberts, S. G., Paluszny, A., Belayneh, M., Burri, A., Mezentsev, A., Lu, H., Coumou, D., Driesner, T. & Heinrich, C. A. 2007 b Numerical simulation of multi-phase fluid flow in structurally complex reservoirs. Geol. Soc. Spec. Publ. 292 (1), 405429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthai, S. K., Mezentsev, A. & Belayneh, M. 2005 Control-volume finite-element two-phase flow experiments with fractured rock represented by unstructured 3d hybrid meshes. In Proceedings of SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. W. & Gomolinski, A. 2019 Flow in bounded and unbounded pore networks with different connectivity. J. Hydrol. 577, 123937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moes, N., Dolbow, J. & Belytschko, T. 1999 A finite element method for crack growth without remeshing. Intl J. Numer. Meth. Engng 46 (1), 131150.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F., Jenny, P. & Meyer, D. W. 2013 Multilevel Monte Carlo for two phase flow and Buckley–Leverett transport in random heterogeneous porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 250, 685702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F., Meyer, D. & Jenny, P. 2016 Parallel multilevel Monte Carlo for two phase flow and transport in random heterogeneous porous media with sampling error and discretization error balancing. SPE J. 21 (6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, F., Meyer, D. W. & Jenny, P. 2014 Solver-based vs. grid-based multilevel Monte Carlo for two phase flow and transport in random heterogeneous porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 268, 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, D. L., Cherry, J. A. & Farvolden, R. N. 1991 Groundwater flow and solute transport in fractured lacustrine clay near Mexico City. Water Resour. Res. 27 (9), 21872201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Santvoort, J. & Golombok, M. 2018 Improved recovery from fractured oil reservoirs. J. Petrol. Sci. Engng 167, 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tester, J. W., Anderson, B. J., Batchelor, A. S., Blackwell, D. D., DiPippo, R., Drake, E. M., Garnish, J., Livesay, B., Moore, M. C., Nichols, K. et al. 2007 Impact of enhanced geothermal systems on US energy supply in the twenty-first century. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365 (1853), 10571094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Viswanathan, H. S., Hyman, J. D., Karra, S., O'Malley, D., Srinivasan, S., Hagberg, A. & Srinivasan, G. 2018 Advancing graph-based algorithms for predicting flow and transport in fractured rock. Water Resour. Res. 54 (9), 60856099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar