Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:10:18.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of nonlinear wave resistance using integral equations in Fourier space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

T. Miloh
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
G. Dagan
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Faculty of Engineering, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

Abstract

An attempt is made in this paper to tackle the problem of nonlinear wave resistance by formulating it in Fourier space and by deriving a nonlinear integral equation for the wave amplitude by an approach similar to the one leading to the Zakharov equation.

The procedure is illustrated for two simple examples of two- and three-dimensional travelling pressure distributions. A regular perturbation solution up to third-order terms in the slenderness parameter shows that the expansion is not uniform for small Froude numbers. A uniform, generalized, expansion is then constructed, with its leading term satisfying a new nonlinear integral equation. This rather simple integral equation, of a Volterra type, is solved numerically. The generalized wave drag is shown to be significantly larger than the one predicted by the regular perturbation expansion at small Froude number. The method adopted here has the advantage of singling out in a systematic manner the terms of the free-surface conditions which cause the small-Froude-number non-uniformity, and it is applicable to both two- and three-dimensional flows. The results are compared with existing approximate methods of computing wave drag at low Froude numbers. It is found that quasilinearized approximations may be quite accurate for the examples considered here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dagan, G. 1975 Waves and wave resistance of thin bodies moving at low speed: the free surface nonlinear effect. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 405417.Google Scholar
Dagan, G. & Miloh, T. 1985 A study of nonlinear wave resistance by a Zakharov-type integral equation. In Proc. 15th Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Hamburg (in press).
Dawson, C. W. 1977 A practical computer method for solving ship-wave problems. In Proc. 2nd Intl Conf. Ship Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, pp. 3038.
Doctors, L. J. & Dagan, G. 1980 Comparison of nonlinear wave resistance theories for a two-dimensional pressure distribution. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 647672.Google Scholar
Havelock, T. H. 1934 The calculation of wave resistance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 144, 514521.Google Scholar
Inui, T. & Kajitani, H. 1977 A study on local nonlinear free surface effects in ship waves and wave resistance. In Proc. 25th Anniv. Coll. Inst. für Schiffbau, Hamburg.
Kelvin, Lord 1896 On stationary waves in flowing water. Phil. Mag. 22, 517530.Google Scholar
Lamb, H. 1935 Hydrodynamics, 6th edn. Dover.
Michell, J. H. 1898 The wave resistance of a ship. Phil. Mag. 45, 106123.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, T. F. 1968 Wave resistance – the low speed limit. Univ. Michigan Dept Naval Arch. Mar. Engng Rep. 002.
Tulin, M. P. 1978 Ship wave resistance – a survey. In Proc. 8th U.S. Natl Congr. Applied Mechanics, UCLA, Los Angeles.
Tulin, M. P. 1982 An exact theory of gravity wave generation by moving bodies, its approximation and its implications. In Proc. 14th Symp. Naval Hydrodynamics, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Van Dyke, M. 1964 Perturbation Methods in Fluid Mechanics. Academic.
Wehausen, J. V. & Laitone, E. V. 1960 Surface waves. In Encyclopedia of Physics, vol. 9, pp. 446478. Springer.
Yuen, H. C. & Lake, B. M. 1982 Nonlinear dynamics of deep-water gravity waves. Adv. Appl. Mech. 22, 67229.Google Scholar
Zakharov, V. E. 1968 Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on a surface of a deep fluid. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9, 190194.Google Scholar