Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T05:32:25.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stokes flow in arbitrary two-dimensional domains: shear flow over ridges and cavities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2006

Jonathan J. L. Higdon
Jonathan J. L. Higdon
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1209 W. California Street, Urbana, Illinois 61821
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method is described for solving the integral equations governing Stokes flow in arbitrary two-dimensional domains. It is demonstrated that the boundary-integral method provides an accurate, efficient and easy-to-implement strategy for the solution of Stokes-flow problems. Calculations are presented for simple shear flow in a variety of geometries including cylindrical and rectangular, ridges and cavities. A full description of the flow field is presented including streamline patterns, velocity profiles and shear-stress distributions along the solid surfaces. The results are discussed with special relevance to convective transport processes in low-Reynolds-number flows.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 159 , October 1985 , pp. 195 - 226
Copyright
© 1985 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acrivos, A. 1960 Solution of the laminar boundary layer energy equation at high Prandtl numbers. Phys. Fluids 3, 657–658.Google Scholar
Carnahan, B., Luther, H. A. & Wilkes, J. O. 1969 Applied Numerical Methods. Wiley.
Davis, A. M. J. & O'Neill, M. E. 1977 Separation in a slow linear shear flow past a cylinder and a plane. J. Fluid Mech. 81, 551–564.Google Scholar
Dean, W. R. & Montagnon, P. E. 1949 On the steady motion of a viscous liquid in a corner. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 45, 389–394.Google Scholar
Happel, J. & Brenner, H. 1973 Low Reynolds Number Hydrodynamics, 2nd edn. Noordhoff.
Hasimoto, H. & Sano, O. 1980 Stokeslets and eddies in creeping flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 12, 335–363.Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1979a The generation of feeding currents by flagellar motions. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 305–330.Google Scholar
Higdon, J. J. L. 1979b The hydrodynamics of flagellar propulsion: helical waves. J. Fluid Mech. 94, 331–351.Google Scholar
Hinch, E. J. 1972 Note on the symmetries of certain matersial tensors for a particle in Stokes flow. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 423–425.Google Scholar
Jackson, N. & Finlayson, B. A. 1982 Calculation of the hole pressure. I. Newtonian fluids. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 10, 55–69.Google Scholar
Jeffrey, D. J. & Sherwood, J. D. 1980 Streamline patterns and eddies in low Reynolds number flow. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 315–334.Google Scholar
Kim, M.-U. 1980 Slow viscous flow around a vertical fence on a plane. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 49, 2387–2391.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H. & Leal, L. G. 1982 The motion of a sphere in the presence of a deformable interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 87, 81–106.Google Scholar
Lighthill, M. J. 1950 Contributions to the theory of heat transfer through a laminar boundary layer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 202, 359–377.Google Scholar
Lorentz, H. A. 1896 Amsterdam, Zittingsverlag Akad. v. Wet. 5, 168.
Malkus, D. S. 1976 In Proceedings of the VII Intl Congr. on Rheology, Gothenberg, Sweden (ed. C. Klason & J. Kubat), pp. 00–00.
Mikhlin, S. G. 1957 Integral Equations. Macmillan.
Mir-Mohamad-Sadegh, S. & Rajagopal, K. R. 1980 The flow of a non-Newtonian fluid past projections and depressions. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 47, 485–488.Google Scholar
Moffatt, H. K. 1964 Viscous and resistive eddies near a sharp corner. J. Fluid Mech. 18, 1–18.Google Scholar
O'Brien, V. 1982 Viscous flow in an annulus with a sector cavity. Trans. ASME I: J. Fluids Engng 104, 500–504.Google Scholar
O'Brien, V. 1983 Flow in pressure holes. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 12, 383–386.Google Scholar
O'Neill, M. E. 1977 On the separation of a slow linear shear flow from a cylindrical ridge or trough in a plane. Z. angew. Math. Phys. 28, 439–448.Google Scholar
Pan, F. & Acrivos, A. 1967 Steady flows in rectangular cavities. J. Fluid Mech. 28, 643–655.Google Scholar
Rallison, J. M. & Acrivos, A. 1978 A numerical study of the deformation and burst of a viscous drop in an extensional flow. J. Fluid Mech. 89, 191–200.Google Scholar
Sanders, J., O'Brien, V. & Joseph, D. D. 1980 Stokes flow in a driven sector by two different methods. Trans. ASME E: J. Appl. Mech. 47, 482–484.Google Scholar
Takematsu, M. 1966 Slow viscous flow past a cavity. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 21, 1816–1821.Google Scholar
Trogdon, S. A. & Joseph, D. D. 1982 Matched eigenfunction expansions for slow flow over a slot. J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 10, 185–213.Google Scholar
Wakiya, S. 1975 Application of bipolar coordinates to the two dimensional creeping motion of a liquid. I. Flow over a projection or depression on a wall. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 39, 1113–1120.Google Scholar
Wakiya, S. 1978 Application of bipolar coordinates to the two dimensional creeping motion of a liquid. III. Separation in Stokes flow. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 45, 1756–1763.Google Scholar
Youngren, G. K. & Acrivos, A. 1975 Stokes flow past a particle of arbitrary shape: a numerical method of solution. J. Fluid Mech. 69, 377–403.Google Scholar