Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:14:08.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The stability and transition of a two-dimensional jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

Hiroshi Sato
Hiroshi Sato
Affiliation:
Aeronautical Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was made of the transition of a two-dimensional jet. In the region where laminar flow becomes unstable, two kinds of sinusoidal velocity fluctuation have been found; one is symmetrical and the other is anti-symmetrical with respect to the centre line of the jet. The fluctuations grow exponentially at first and develop into turbulence without being accompanied by abrupt bursts or turbulent spots.

The response characteristics of laminar jets to artificial external excitation were investigated in detail by using sound as an exciting agent. The effect of excitation was seen to be most remarkable when the frequency of excitation coincides with that of self-excited sinusoidal fluctuations.

Numerical solutions of equation of small disturbances superposed on laminar flow were obtained assuming the Reynolds number as infinity. Theoretical eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are in good agreement with experimental results, thus verifying the existence of a region of linear disturbance in the two-dimensional jet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , January 1960 , pp. 53 - 80
Copyright
© 1960 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, E. N. Da C. 1939 Proc. Phys. Soc. 51, 784.Google Scholar
Brown, G. B. 1935 Proc. Phys. Soc. 47, 703.Google Scholar
Förthmann, E. 1934 Ingen.-Arch. 5, 42.Google Scholar
Lessen, M. & Fox, J. A. 1955-50 Jahre Grenzschichtforschung, p. 122.Google Scholar
Roshko, A. 1953 Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., Tech. Note no. 2913.Google Scholar
Rotta, J. 1956 Ingen.-Arch. 24, 258.Google Scholar
Sato, H., Kobashi, Y., Iuchi, M., Yamamoto, K. & Onda, Y. 1954 Rep. Inst. Sci. Tech. Univ. Tokyo, 8, 271.Google Scholar
Sato, H. 1956 J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 11, 702.Google Scholar
Sato, H. 1957 Rep. Inst. Sci. Tech. Univ. Tokyo, 11, 73.Google Scholar
Sato, H. 1959 Rep. Aero. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo (to be published).Google Scholar
Savic, P. 1941 Phil. Mag. 32, 245.Google Scholar
Schlichting, H. 1934 Z. angew. Math. Mech. 14, 368.Google Scholar
Schubauer, G. B. & Skramstad, H. K. 1948 Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., Rep. no. 909.Google Scholar
Schubauer, G. B. & Klebanoff, P. S. 1956 Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash., Rep. no. 1289.Google Scholar
Tatsumi, T. & Kakutani, T. 1958 J. Fluid Mech. 4, 261.Google Scholar
Townsend, A. A. 1956 The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow, p. 192. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wehrmann, O. & Wille, R. 1957 Proc. Boundary Layer Symposium, Freiburg, p. 387.Google Scholar