Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-zrtmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-02T14:07:10.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rotating hydraulics of flow in a parabolic channel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

Karin Borenäs  and
Peter Lundberg
Karin Borenäs
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, University of Göteborg, Box 4038, S-400 40 Göteborg, Sweden
Peter Lundberg
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, University of Göteborg, Box 4038, S-400 40 Göteborg, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The investigation of Gill (1977) on the effects of a finite upstream depth upon frictionless flow through a rotating box-like channel has been extended to take into account a parabolic geometry. In addition to being more geophysically realistic, this type of topography with continuously sloping lateral boundaries has the advantage that it yields a unified solution. In contrast to the case of a rectangular channel, no separation of the geostrophically balanced downchannel flow from the sidewalk can take place. The resulting algebraic problem can be resolved either using an iterative technique or by the construction of perturbation series solutions. One of the most important results to emerge from the analysis is that the classical concept of hydraulic control is only applicable for a limited range of the parameters governing the problem. It is finally argued that this behaviour of the solutions is not due to the specific choice of geometry, but rather represents a common feature for all topographies characterized by a continuously sloping cross-stream bottom profile.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 167 , June 1986 , pp. 309 - 326
Copyright
© 1986 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gill, A. E. 1977 The hydraulics of rotating-channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 80, 641–671.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. G., Biscaye, P., Gardner, W. & Schmitz, W. J. 1982 On the transport and modification of the Antarctic Bottom Water in the Vema Channel. J. Mar. Res. 40 (Suppl.), 231–263.Google Scholar
Hogg, N. G. 1983 Hydraulic control and flow separation in a multi-layered fluid with applications to the Vema Channel. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 13, 695–708.Google Scholar
Houghton, D. D. 1969 Effect of rotation on the formation of hydraulic jumps. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 1351–1360.Google Scholar
Roed, L. P. 1980 Curvature effects on hydraulically driven inertial boundary currents. J. Fluid Mech. 96, 395–412.Google Scholar
Sambuco, E. & Whitehead, J. A. 1976 Hydraulic control by a wide weir in a rotating fluid. J. Fluid Mech. 73, 521–528.Google Scholar
Shen, C. Y. 1981 The rotating hydraulics of the open-channel flow between two basins. J. Fluid Mech. 112, 161–188.Google Scholar
Stalcup, M. C., Metcalf, W. G. & Johnson, R. G. 1975 Deep Caribbean inflow through the Anegada-Jungfern Passage. J. Mar. Res. 33 (Suppl.), 15–35.Google Scholar
Stern, M. E. 1972 Hydraulically critical rotating flow. Phys. Fluids 15, 2062–2064.Google Scholar
Stern, M. E. 1974 Comment on rotating hydraulics. Geophys Fluid Dyn. 6, 127–130.Google Scholar
van Dyke, M. 1974 Analysis and mprovement of perturbation series. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 27, 423–450.Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. A., Leetmaa, A. & Knox, R. A. 1974 Rotating hydraulics of strait and sill flows. Geophys. Fluid Dyn. 6, 101–125.Google Scholar