Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T11:25:34.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rheology of a semi-dilute suspension of swimming model micro-organisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2007

TAKUJI ISHIKAWA  and
T. J. PEDLEY
TAKUJI ISHIKAWA
Affiliation:
Department of Bioengineering and Robotics, Tohoku University, 6-6-01, Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
T. J. PEDLEY
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rheological properties of a cell suspension may play an important role in the flow field generated by populations of swimming micro-organisms (e.g. in bioconvection). In this paper, a swimming micro-organism is modelled as a squirming sphere with prescribed tangential surface velocity, in which the centre of mass of the sphere may be displaced from the geometric centre (bottom-heaviness). Effects of inertia and Brownian motion are neglected, because real micro-organisms swim at very low Reynolds numbers but are too large for Brownian effects to be important. The three-dimensional movement of 64 identical squirmers in a simple shear flow field, contained in a cube with periodic boundary conditions, is dynamically computed, for random initial positions and orientations. The computation utilizes a database of pairwise interactions that has been constructed by the boundary element method. The restriction to pairwise additivity of forces is expected to be justified if the suspension is semi-dilute. The results for non-bottom-heavy squirmers show that the squirming does not have a direct influence on the apparent viscosity. However, it does change the probability density in configuration space, and thereby causes a slight decrease in the apparent viscosity at O(c2), where c is the volume fraction of spheres. In the case of bottom-heavy squirmers, on the other hand, the stresslet generated by the squirming motion directly contributes to the bulk stress at O(c), and the suspension shows strong non-Newtonian properties. When the background simple shear flow is directed vertically, the apparent viscosity of the semi-dilute suspension of bottom-heavy squirmers becomes smaller than that of inert spheres. When the shear flow is horizontal and varies with the vertical coordinate, on the other hand, the apparent viscosity becomes larger than that of inert spheres. In addition, significant normal stress differences appear for all relative orientations of gravity and the shear flow, in the case of bottom-heavy squirmers.

Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 588 , 10 October 2007 , pp. 399 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Batchelor, G. K. 1970 The stress system in a suspension of force-free particles. J. Fluid Mech. 41, 545–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. 1977 The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 83, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 a The hydrodynamic interaction of two small freely-moving spheres in a linear flow field. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batchelor, G. K. & Green, J. T. 1972 b The determination of the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles to order c2. J. Fluid Mech. 56, 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bees, M. A. & Hill, N. A. 1998 Linear bioconvection in a suspension of randomly-swimming, gyrotactic micro-organisms. Phys. Fluids 10, 1864–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. R. 1971 A spherical envelope approach to ciliary propulsion. J. Fluid Mech. 46, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossis, G. & Brady, J. F. 1984 Dynamic simulation of sheared suspensions. Part I. General method. J. Chem. Phys. 80, 5141–5154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1985 The rheology of concentrated suspensions of spheres in simple shear flow by numerical simulation. J. Fluid Mech. 155, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1988 Stokesian dynamics. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 20, 111–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, J. F., Phillips, R. J., Lester, J. C. & Bossis, G. 1988 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting suspensions. J. Fluid Mech. 195, 257–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brenner, H. 1969 Rheology of a dilute suspension of dipolar spherical particles in an external field. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 32, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Childress, S., Levandowsky, M. & Spiegel, E. A. 1975 Pattern formation in a suspension of swimming micro-organisms: Equations and stability theory. J. Fluid Mech. 63, 591–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cichocki, B. & Felderhof, B. U. 1988 a Short-time diffusion coefficients and high frequency viscosity of dilute suspensions of spherical Brownian particles. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 1049–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dombrowski, C., Cisneros, L., Chatkaew, S., Goldstein, R. E. & Kessler, J. O. 2004 Self-concentration and large-scale coherence in bacterial dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 098103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dratler, D. I. & Schowalter, W. R. 1996 Dynamic simulation of suspensions of non-Brownian hard spheres. J. Fluid Mech. 325, 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlofsky, L., Brady, J. F. & Bossis, G. 1987 Dynamic simulation of hydrodynamically interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 180, 21–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, A. 1906 Eine neue Bestimmung der Moleküldimensionen. Ann. Phys. 19, 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felderhof, B. U. & Jones, R. B. 2004 Small-amplitude swimming of a sphere. Physica A 202, 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guell, D. C., Brenner, H., Frankel, R. B. & Hartman, H. 1988 Hydrodynamic forces and band formation in swimming magnetotactic bacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 135, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatwalne, Y., Ramaswamy, S., Rao, M. & Simha, R.A. 2004 Rheology of active-particle suspensions Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 11801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillesdon, A. J., Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1995 The development of concentration gradients in a suspension of chemotactic bacteria. Bull. Math. Biol. 57, 299–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T. & Pedley, T. J. 2007 Diffusion of swimming model micro-organisms in a semi-dilute suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 588, 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishikawa, T., Simmonds, M. P. & Pedley, T. J. 2006 Hydrodynamic interaction of two swimming model micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 568, 119–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, H., Osborn, T. R. & Meneveau, C. 2002 Hydrodynamic interaction between two copepods: A numerical study. J. Plank. Res. 24, 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. O. 1985 a Hydrodynamic focusing of motile algal cells. Nature 313, 218–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. O. 1985 b Co-operative and concentrative phenomena of swimming micro-organisms. Contemp. Phys. 26, 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. O. 1986 a The external dynamics of swimming micro-organisms. In Progress in Phycological Research, Vol. 4 (ed. Round, F. E. & Chapman, D. J.), pp. 257–307. Biopress.Google Scholar
Kessler, J. O. 1986 b Individual and collective dynamics of swimming cells. J. Fluid Mech. 173, 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. O., Hoelzer, M. A., Pedley, T. J. & Hill, N. A. 1994 Functional pattern of swimming bacteria. In Mechanics and Physiology of Animal Swimming (ed. Maddock, L., Bone, Q. & Rayner, J. M. V.), pp. 3–12, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. & Karrila, S. J. 1992 Microhydrodynamics: Principles and Selected Applications. Butterworth–Heinemann.Google Scholar
Lega, J. & Passot, T. 2003 Hydrodynamics of bacterial colonies. Phys. Rev. E 67, 031906.Google ScholarPubMed
Lighthill, M. J. 1952 On the squirming motion of nearly spherical deformable bodies through liquids at very small Reynolds numbers. Commun. Pure Appl. Maths. 5, 109–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magar, V., Goto, T. & Pedley, T. J. 2003 Nutrient uptake by a self-propelled steady squirmer. Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths. 56, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehandia, V. & Nott, P. R. 2004 The collective dynamics of self-propelled particles (abstract). In Proc. XXI ICTAM, Poland, FM16L-10603.Google Scholar
Mendelson, N. H., Bourque, A., Wilkening, K., Anderson, K. R. & Watkins, J. C. 1999 Organised cell swimming motions in Bacillus subtilis colonies: Patterns of short-lived whirls and jets. J. Bacteriol. 180, 600–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, A. M. & Pedley, T. J. 2001 Falling plumes in bacterial bioconvection. J. Fluid Mech. 445, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalfe, A. M., Pedley, T. J. & Thingstad, T. F. 2004 Incorporating turbulence into a plankton foodweb model. J. Marine Systems 49, 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasseri, S. & Phan-Thien, N. 1997 Hydrodynamic interaction between two nearby swimming micromachines. Comput. Mech. 20, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nott, P. R. & Brady, J. F. 1994 Pressure-driven flow of suspensions: simulation and theory. J. Fluid Mech. 275, 157–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunan, K. C. & Keller, J. B. 1984 Effective viscosity of a periodic suspension. J. Fluid Mech. 142, 269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, R. W. 1979 A method for the calculation of the effective transport properties of suspensions of interacting particles. J. Fluid Mech. 19, 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1990 A new continuum model for suspensions of gyrotactic micro-organisms. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 155–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedley, T. J. & Kessler, J. O. 1992 Hydrodynamic phenomena in suspensions of swimming microorganisms. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24, 313–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramia, M., Tullock, D. L. & Phan-Thien, N. 1993 The role of hydrodynamic interaction in the locomotion of microorganisms. Biophys. J. 65, 755–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, H. A. & Samuel, A. D. T. 1996 Propulsion of microorganisms by surface distortions. Phys. Rev. Lett. A 77, 4102–4104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed