Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T22:47:01.436Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Pitot probes in turbulent streams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

H. A. Becker
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario
A. P. G. Brown
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario

Abstract

The response of a Pitot probe in a uniform laminar stream is commonly expressed in the form \[ P_s = P+{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}C_{\rho} U^2, \] where Ps is the probe signal pressure, P is the stream static pressure, U is the stream speed and ρ is the fluid density. It has been found that for ordinary sphere-nosed, round-nosed and square-nosed probes \[ 1-C = K(\sin^2\theta)^m = K(U^2_n/U^2)^m, \] where θ is the angle between the velocity vector and the probe axis, and UnU sin θ is the transverse velocity component. The parameters m and K are functions of the probe geometry. These formulae also describe the performance in a turbulent stream when the probe is small compared with the turbulence scale. The evaluation of the time-averaged response is treated, and an answer is developed to the question of what it is that a Pitot probe measures in a turbulent stream. In a turbulent shear flow having the properties of a boundary layer, the reference pressure is best taken to be the static pressure at the shear-layer edge. It is shown that round-nosed probes with Di/D≃0·45 and square-nosed probes with Di/D≃0·15 then detect ${\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\rho\overline{U}^2_x$ with good accuracy, where Di/D is the ratio of the inside and outside diameters of the Pitot tube. When measurements are made with two probes of dissimilar geometry, the differential response can be used to find the mean-square level of the transverse velocity fluctuations. Turbulence levels so measured agree closely with results from hot-wire anemometry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1974 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, L. G. T., Baron, T. & Comings, E. W. 1950 University of Illinois Engng Exp. Station Tech. Rep. no. 8.
Becker, H. A. & Brown, A. P. G. 1969 Velocity fluctuations in turbulent jets and flames. 12th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, p. 1059.Google Scholar
Becker, H. A. & Brown, A. P. G. 1972 Pitot response functions for turbulent flows. Thermal & Fluid Sci. Group, Dept. Chem. Engng, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Rep. no. 2–72.Google Scholar
Becker, H. A., Hottel, H. C. & Williams, G. C. 1963 9th Symp. (Int.) on Combustion, p. 842.
Becker, H. A., Hottel, H. C. & Williams, G. C. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. 30, 285.
Becker, H. A. & Massaro, T. A. 1968 J. Fluid Mech. 31, 435.
Brown, A. P. G. 1971 Structure of the round free turbulent propane–air diffusion flame. Ph.D. thesis, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
Corrsin, S. & Uberoi, M. S. 1950 N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 998.
Curtet, R. & Ricou, F. P. 1964 Trans. A.S.M.E. D86, 765.
Davies, P. O. A. L. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 3, 441.
Davies, P. O. A. L., Fisher, M. J. & Barratt, M. J. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 15, 337.
Ebrahimi, I. 1967 Combustion & Flame, 11, 225.
Eickhoff, H. 1969 Chem. Ing. Tech. 41, 721.
Gibson, M. M. 1963 J. Fluid Mech. 15, 161.
Goldstein, S. 1936 Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 155, 570.
Gracey, W., Letko, W. & Russell, W. B. 1951 N.A.C.A. Tech. Note, no. 2331.
Hackeschmidt, M. 1968 Maschinenbautech. 17, H 4.
Hall, I. M. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 141.
Hinze, J. O. 1959 Turbulence McGraw-Hill.
Hinze, J. O. & van der Hegge Zijnen, B. G. 1949 Appl. Sci. Res. A, 1, 435.
Kiel, G. 1935 Total head meter with small sensitivity to yaw. N.A.C.A. Tech. Mem. no. 775. (Trans. from Luftfahrt, p. 75, 1935.)Google Scholar
Koplin, M. A. 1964 J. Fluid Mech. 18, 529.
Laurence, J. C. 1956 N.A.C.A. Rep. no. 1292.
Lighthill, M. J. 1957 J. Fluid Mech. 2, 493.
Merriam, K. G. & Spaulding, E. R. 1931 N.A.C.A. Tech. Note, no. 546.
Myadzu, A. 1936 Ingen. Arch. 7, 35.
Ower, E. & Johansen, F. C. 1926 Aero. Res. Counc. R. & M. no. 981.
Pankhurst, R. C. & Holder, D. W. 1952 Wind-tunnel Technique. London: Pitman.
Ray, A. K. 1956 Ingen. Arch. 24, 171. (Trans. Aero. Res. Counc. Rep. no. 7, p. 498.)
Wad, G. 1969 Disa Inf. 7, 25.
Wygnanski, I. & Fiedler, H. 1969 J. Fluid Mech. 38, 577.