Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T15:22:09.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The reflexion of a shock wave at a rigid wall in the presence of a boundary layer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2006

L. F. Henderson
L. F. Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Sydney
Now on leave at Graduate School of Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper discusses the reflexion of a shock wave off a rigid wall in the presence of a boundary layer. The basic idea is to treat the problem not as a reflexion but as a refraction process. The structure of the wave system is deduced by a simple mapping procedure. It is found that a Mach stem is always present and that the bottom of this wave is bifurcated—called a lambda foot. The reflexion is said to be regular if the Mach stem and the lambda foot are confined to the boundary layer and irregular if either extends into the main stream. Two types of regular reflexion are found, one that has reflected compression waves and the other that has both reflected compression and expansion waves. Initial conditions are given that enable one to decide which type will appear. There are also two types of irregular reflexion, one that has a Mach stem present in the main stream and the other that is characterized by a four-wave confluence. Finally there are also two processes by which regular reflexions become irregular. One is due to the formation of a downstream shock wave that subsequently sweeps upstream to establish the irregular system and the other is due to boundary-layer separation which forces the lambda foot into the main stream.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , 22 December 1967 , pp. 699 - 722
Copyright
© 1967 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackeret, J., Feldmann, F. & Rott, N. 1946 Mitt. Inst. Aerodyn. Zürich, no. 10 (Zürich), or Tech. Note Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash. no. 1113.
Bardsley, O. & Mair, W. A. 1951 Phil. Mag. 42, 39.
Barry, F. W., Shapiro, A. H. & Neumann, E. P. 1951 J. Aero. Sci. 18, 229.
Bogdonoff, S. M. & Kepler, C. E. 1955 J. Aero Sci. 22, 414.
Chapman, D. R., Kuehn, D. M. & Larson, H. K. 1958 Rept. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash. no. 1356.
Curle, N. 1962 The Laminar Boundary Layer Equations. London: Oxford University Press.
Fage, A. & Sargent, R. F. 1947 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 190, 1.
Gadd, G. E., Holder, D. W. & Regan, J. D. 1954 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 226, 227.
Guderley, K. G. 1947 Tech. Rept. Headquarters Air Materiel Command, Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio, no. F—TR-2168—ND.
Guderley, K. G. 1962 The Theory of Transonic Flow. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Hakkinen, R. J., Greber, I. & Trilling, L. 1959 Memo. Nat. Aero. and Space Admin., Wash. no. 2–18–59W.
Henderson, L. F. 1966 J. Fluid Mech. 26, 607.
Henderson, L. F. 1967 J. Fluid Mech. (in the press).
Holder, D. W. & Gadd, G. E. 1955 Boundary Layer Effects in Aerodynamics. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Jahn, R. G. 1956 J. Fluid Mech. 1, 457.
Kawamura, R. & Saito, H. 1956 J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 11, 584.
Lees, L. & Reeves, B. L. 1964 A.I.A.A. J. 2, 1907.
Liepmann, H. W. 1946 J. Aero. Sci. 13, 623.
Liepmann, H. W., Roshko, A. & Dawan, S. 1952 Rept. Nat. Adv. Comm. Aero., Wash. no. 1100.