Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:40:21.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A reconsideration of the three-shock theory for a pseudo-steady Mach reflection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2006

G. Ben-Dor
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, P.O. Box 653, Israel

Abstract

The analytical solution of a pseudo-steady Mach reflection was considered. It was found that the solution of the well-known perfect-gas conservation equations of a pseudo-steady Mach reflection - the three-shock theory - failed to accurately predict the angles between the incident, reflected and Mach stem shock waves. The disagreement between theory and experiments was not settled even when real-gas effects were accounted for. However, the inclusion of real-gas effects did improve the analytical predictions. In order to improve the analytical model, the boundary layers developing on both sides of the slipstream were integrated into the analysis. Using these boundary layers, the displacement thickness as a function of distance along the slipstream from the triple point was calculated. The displacement thickness was then related to the angular displacement of the slipstream, as a function of that distance. Finally it was shown that the displacement, taken at a distance equivalent to the incident-shock-wave thickness, could be used to obtain computed results which agree with experimentally measured data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1987 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ben-Dor, G. 1978 UTIAS Rep. 232.
Ben-Dor, G. 1981 AIAA J. 19, 531.
Ben-Dor, G. & Glass, I. I. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 92, 459.
Ben-Dor, G., Mazor, G., Takayama, K. & Igra, O. 1987 J. Fluid Mech. 176, 333.
Courant, R. & Friedrichs, K. O. 1948 Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves. Interscience.
Dewey, J. M. & McMillin, D. J. 1985a J. Fluid Mech. 152, 49.
Dewey, J. M. & McMillin, D. J. 1985b J. Fluid Mech. 152, 67.
Glass, I. I. 1986 AIAA Paper 86–0306.
Henderson, L. F. 1964 Aero. Q. XV, 181.
Hornung, H. G. & Taylor, J. R. 1979 J. Fluid Mech. 90, 541.
Lock, R. C. 1950 Q. J. Mech. Appl. Maths 4, 42.
Mazor, G., Ben-Dor, G. & Igra, O. 1985 AIAA J. 23, 636.
Shames, I. H. 1982 Mechanics of Fluids. McGraw-Hill.
Shirouzu, M. & Glass, I. I. 1982 UTIAS Rep. 264.
Smith, L. G. 1945 OSRD Rep. 6271.
White, D. R. 1951 Dept. Phys., Princeton Univ. Tech. Rep. II–10.
White, D. R. 1952 Proc. 2nd Midwestern Conference on Fluid Mechanics.