Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T15:51:52.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Receptivity of pipe Poiseuille flow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2006

Anatoli Tumin
Affiliation:
Department of Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel

Abstract

The receptivity problem is considered for pipe flow with periodic blow–suction through a narrow gap in the pipe wall. Axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric modes (1, 2, and 3) are analysed. The method of solution is based on global eigenvalue analysis for spatially growing disturbances in circular pipe Poiseuille flow. The numerical procedure is formulated in terms of the collocation method with the Chebyshev polynomials application. The receptivity problem is solved with an expansion of the solution in a biorthogonal eigenfunction system, and it was found that there is an excitation of many eigenmodes, which should be taken into account. The result explains the non-similar character of the amplitude distribution in the downstream direction that was observed in experiments.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1996 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashpis, D. E. & Reshotko, E. 1990 The vibrating ribbon problem revisited. J. Fluid Mech. 213, 513547.Google Scholar
Bergström, L. 1992 Initial algebraic growth of small angular dependent disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow. Stud. Appl. Maths 87, 6179.Google Scholar
Bergström, L. 1993a Optimal growth of small disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids A 5, 27102719.Google Scholar
Bergström, L. 1993b Evolution of laminar disturbances in pipe Poiseuille flow. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 12, 749768.Google Scholar
Boberg, L. & Brosa, U. 1988 Onset of turbulence in a pipe. Z. Naturforsch. 43 a, 697726Google Scholar
Bramley, J. S. 1986 The calculation of eigenvalues for the stationary perturbation of symmetrical pipe Poiseuille flow. J. Comput. Phys. 64, 258265.Google Scholar
Choudhary, M. 1993 Roughness-induced generation of crossflow vortices in three-dimensional boundary layers. NASA-CR 4505.
Cohen, J. & Wygnanski, I. 1987 The evolution of instabilities in the axisymmetric jet. Part 1. The linear growth of disturbances near the nozzle. J. Fluid Mech 176, 191219.Google Scholar
Corcos, G. M. & Sellars, J. R. 1959 On the stability of fully developed flow in a pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 97112.Google Scholar
Darbyshire, A. G. & Mullin, T. 1995 Transition to turbulence in constant-mass-flux pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 289, 83114.Google Scholar
Drazin, P. G. & Reid, W. H. 1981 Hydrodynamic Stability Cambrige University Press.
Fedorov, A. V. 1984 Excitation of Tollmien-Schlichting waves in a boundary layer by a periodic external source located on the body surface. Fluid Dyn. 19 888893 (from Russian).Google Scholar
Fox, J. A., Lessen, M. & Bhat, W. V. 1968 Experimental investigation of the stability of Hagen-Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 11, 14.Google Scholar
Garg, V. K. & Rouleau, W. T. 1972 Linear spatial stability of pipe Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 113127.Google Scholar
Gaster, M. 1965 On the generation of spatially growing waves in a boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 22, 433441.Google Scholar
Gill, A. E. 1965 On the behaviour of small disturbances to Poiseuille flow in a circular pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 21, 145172.Google Scholar
Goldstein, M. E. & Hultgren, L. S. 1989 Boundary layer receptivity to long wave free-stream disturbances. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 21, 137166.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, L. H. 1989 Direct resonance of nonaxisymmetric disturbances in pipe flow. Stud. Appl. Maths 80, 95108.Google Scholar
Ivanov, A. V. & Kachanov, Yu.S. 1994 Excitation and development of spatial packets of instability waves in a three-dimensional boundary layer. Thermophys. Aeromech. Russian Acad. Sci. 1, No. 4, 287305.Google Scholar
Kaskel, A. 1961 Experimental study of the stability of pipe flow. II. Development of disturbance generator. Jet Propulsion Laboratory Tech. Rep. 32138. Pasadena, California.
Khorrami, M. R., Malik, M. R. & Ash, R. L. 1989 Application of spectral collocation techniques to the stability of swirling flows. J. Comput. Phys. 81, 206229.Google Scholar
Leite, R. J. 1959 An experimental investigation of the stability of Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 5, 8197.Google Scholar
Lessen, M., Sadler, S. G. & Liu, T. Y. 1968 Stability of pipe Poiseuille flow. Phys. Fluids 11, 14041409.Google Scholar
Liang, F. P. & Reshotko, E. 1991 An inviscid stability analysis of unbounded supersonic mixing layer flows. EMAE/TR 90199, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.
Lin, C. C. 1955 The Theory of Hydrodynamic Stability. Cambrige University Press.
Morkovin, M. V. 1969 Critical evaluation of transition from laminar to turbulent shear layers with emphasis on hypersonically traveling bodies. AFF DL-TR-68149, Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab., Wright-Patherson AFB, Ohio.
Morkovin, M. V. & Reshotko, E. 1989 Dialogue on progress and issues in stability and transition research. In Laminar-Turbulent Transition, IUTAM Symp., Toulouse (ed. D. Arnal & R. Michel), pp. 129. Springer.
Pekeris, C. L. 1948 Stability of the laminar flow through a straight pipe of circular cross section to infinitesimal disturbance which are symmetrical about the axis of the pipe. Proc. US Natl Acad. Sci. 34, 285295.Google Scholar
Phillips, T. N. & Roberts, G. W. 1993 The treatment of spurious pressure modes in spectral incompressible flow calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 105, 150164.Google Scholar
Pretsch, J. 1941 Über die Stabilität der Laminarströmung in einem geraden Rohr mit Kre-isförmigem Querschmitt. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 21, 204217.Google Scholar
Reshotko, E. 1958 Experimental study of the stability of pipe flow. I. Establishment of an axially symmetric Poiseuille flow. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Progress Rep. 20364, Pasadena, California.
Reshotko, E. 1976 Boundary-layer stability and transition. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 8, 311349.Google Scholar
Reynolds, O. 1983 An experimental investigation of the circumstances which determine whether the motion of water shall be direct or sinuous, and of the law of resistance in parallel channels. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. 174, 935982.Google Scholar
Salwen, H., Cotton, F. W. & Grosch, C. E. 1980 Linear stability of Poiseuille flow in a circular pipe. J. Fluid Mech. 98, 273284.Google Scholar
Salwen, H. & Grosch, C. E. 1972 The stability of Poiseuille flow in a pipe of a circular cross-section. J. Fluid Mech. 54, 93112.Google Scholar
Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1994 Optimal energy density growth in Hagen-Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 277, 197225.Google Scholar
Sexl, Th. 1927a Zur Stabilitätsfrage der Poiseuilleschen und Couetteschen Strömung. Ann. Physik 83, 835848.Google Scholar
Sexl, Th. 1927b Über dreidimensionale Störungen der Poiseuilleschen Strömung. Ann. Physik 84, 807822.Google Scholar
Tatsumi, T. 1952 Stability of the laminar inlet-flow prior to the formation of Poiseuille regime, Part II. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 7, 495502.Google Scholar
Tumin, A. M. & Fedorov, A. V. 1984 Instability wave excitation by a localized vibrator in the boundary layer. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 25 867873 (from Russian).Google Scholar
Wygnanski, I. & Champagne, F. H. 1973 On transition in a pipe flow. J. Fluid Mech. 59, 281335.Google Scholar
Zhigulev, V. N. & Tumin, A. M. 1987 Origin of Turbulence. Novosibirsk, Nauka (in Russian).