Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:26:10.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Particle fountains in a confined environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2018

Martin C. Lippert
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK
Andrew W. Woods*
Affiliation:
BP Institute, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0EZ, UK
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

We present new experiments and theoretical models of the motion of relatively dense particles carried upwards by a liquid jet into a laterally confined space filled with the same liquid. The incoming jet is negatively buoyant and rises to a finite height, at which the dense mixture of liquid and particles, diluted by the entrainment of ambient liquid, falls back to the floor. The mixture further dilutes during the collapse and then spreads out across the floor and supplies an up-flow outside the fountain equal to the source volume flux plus the total entrained volume flux. The fate of the particles depends on the particle fall speed, $u_{fall}$, compared to (i) the characteristic fountain velocity in the fountain core, $u_{F}$, (ii) the maximum upward velocity in the ambient fluid outside the fountain, $u_{u}(0)$, which occurs at the base of the fountain, and (iii) the upward velocity in the ambient fluid above the top of the fountain associated with the original volume flux in the liquid jet, $u_{BG}$. From this comparison we identify four regimes. (I) If $u_{fall}>u_{F}$, then the particles separate from the fountain and settle on the floor. (II) If $u_{F}>u_{fall}>u_{u}(0)$, the particles are carried to the top of the fountain but then settle as the collapsing flow around the fountain spreads out across the floor; we do not observe particle suspension in the background flow. (III) For $u_{u}(0)>u_{fall}>u_{BG}$ we observe a particle-laden layer outside the fountain which extends from the floor of the tank to a point below the top of the fountain. The density of this lower particle-laden layer equals the density of the collapsing fountain fluid as it passes downwards through this interface. The collapsing fluid then spreads out horizontally through the depth of this particle-laden layer, instead of continuing downwards around the rising fountain. In the lower layer, the negatively buoyant source fluid in fact rises as a negatively buoyant jet, but this transitions into a fountain above the upper interface of the particle-laden layer. The presence of the particles in the lower layer reduces the density difference between fountain and environment, leading to an increase in the fountain height. (IV) If $u_{fall}<u_{BG}$ then an ascending front of particles rises above the fountain and eventually fills the entire tank up to the level where fluid is removed from the tank. We compare the results of a series of new laboratory experiments with simple theoretical investigations for each case, and discuss the relevance of our results.

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© 2018 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansong, J. K., Kyba, P. J. & Sutherland, B. R. 2008 Fountains impinging on a density interface. J. Fluid Mech. 595, 115139.Google Scholar
Baines, W. D., Corriveau, A. F. & Reedman, T. J. 1993 Turbulent fountains in a closed chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 255, 621646.Google Scholar
Baines, W. D. & Turner, J. S. 1969 Turbulent buoyant convection from a source in a confined region. J. Fluid Mech. 37, 5180.Google Scholar
Baines, W. D., Turner, J. S. & Campbell, I. H. 1990 Turbulent fountains in an open chamber. J. Fluid Mech. 212, 557592.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. J. & Kerr, R. C. 1999 Turbulent fountains in a confined stratified environment. J. Fluid Mech. 389, 2754.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. J. & Kerr, R. C. 2000 A theoretical model of a turbulent fountain. J. Fluid Mech. 424, 197216.Google Scholar
Burridge, H. C. & Hunt, G. R. 2016 Entrainment by turbulent fountains. J. Fluid Mech. 790, 407418.Google Scholar
Hunt, G. R. & Burridge, H. C. 2015 Fountains in industry and nature. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 47, 195220.Google Scholar
Linden, P. F. 1999 The fluid mechanics of natural ventilation. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31 (1), 201238.Google Scholar
Lippert, M. C. & Woods, A. W. 2018 Turbulent bubble fountains. J. Fluid Mech. 836, 277303.Google Scholar
Mingotti, N. & Woods, A. W. 2015a On the transport of heavy particles through a downward displacement-ventilated space. J. Fluid Mech. 774, 192223.Google Scholar
Mingotti, N. & Woods, A. W. 2015b On the transport of heavy particles through an upward displacement-ventilated space. J. Fluid Mech. 772, 478507.Google Scholar
Mingotti, N. & Woods, A. W. 2016 On turbulent particle fountains. J. Fluid Mech. 793, R1.Google Scholar
Mizushina, T., Ogino, F., Takeuchi, H. & Ikawa, H. 1982 An experimental study of vertical turbulent jet with negative buoyancy. Wärme- und Stoffübertragung 16 (1), 1521.Google Scholar
Morton, B. R., Taylor, G. & Turner, J. S. 1956 Turbulent gravitational convection from maintained and instantaneous sources. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 234, 123.Google Scholar
Nemoto, S., Kawata, K., Kuribayashii, T., Akiyama, K., Kawai, H. & Murakawai, H. 1997 A study of engine oil aeration. JSAE Rev. 18, 271276.Google Scholar
Rowe, P. N. & Nienow, A. W. 1976 Particle mixing and segregation in gas fluidised beds: a review. Powder Technol. 15 (2), 141147.Google Scholar
Turner, J. S. 1966 Jets and plumes with negative or reversing buoyancy. J. Fluid Mech. 26, 779792.Google Scholar
Woods, A. W. 2010 Turbulent plumes in nature. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 391412.Google Scholar