Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:29:15.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the receptivity of aerofoil tonal noise: an adjoint analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Miguel Fosas de Pando ,
Peter J. Schmid  and
Denis Sipp
Miguel Fosas de Pando*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y Diseño Industrial, Escuela Superior de Ingeniería, Universidad de Cádiz, Avenida de la Universidad de Cádiz, 10, 11519 Puerto Real, Spain
Peter J. Schmid
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
Denis Sipp
Affiliation:
ONERA/DAFE, 8 rue des Vertugadins, 92190 Meudon, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For moderate-to-high Reynolds numbers, aerofoils are known to produce substantial levels of acoustic radiation, known as tonal noise, which arises from a complex interplay between laminar boundary-layer instabilities, trailing-edge acoustic scattering and upstream receptivity of the boundary layers on both aerofoil surfaces. The resulting acoustic spectrum is commonly characterised by distinct equally spaced peaks encompassing the frequency range of convectively amplified instability waves in the pressure-surface boundary layer. In this work, we assess the receptivity and sensitivity of the flow by means of global stability theory and adjoint methods which are discussed in light of the spatial structure of the adjoint global modes, as well as the wavemaker region. It is found that for the frequency range corresponding to acoustic tones the direct global modes capture the growth of instability waves on the suction surface and the near wake together with acoustic radiation into the far field. Conversely, it is shown that the corresponding adjoint global modes, which capture the most receptive region in the flow to external perturbations, have compact spatial support in the pressure surface boundary layer, upstream of the separated flow region. Furthermore, we find that the relative spatial amplitude of the adjoint modes is higher for those modes whose real frequencies correspond to the acoustic peaks. Finally, analysis of the wavemaker region points at the pressure surface near 30 % of the chord as the preferred zone for the placement of actuators for flow control of tonal noise.

JFM classification

Acoustics: Acoustics Acoustics: Aeroacoustics Instability: Instability
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 812 , 10 February 2017 , pp. 771 - 791
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, N. A. & Shariff, K. 1996 A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127 (1), 27–51.Google Scholar
Arbey, H. & Bataille, J. 1983 Noise generated by airfoil profiles placed in a uniform laminar flow. J. Fluid Mech. 134, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodony, D. J. 2006 Analysis of sponge zones for computational fluid mechanics. J. Comput. Phys. 212 (2), 681–702.Google Scholar
Bottaro, A., Corbett, P. & Luchini, P. 2003 The effect of base flow variation on flow stability. J. Fluid Mech. 476, 293–302.Google Scholar
Chomaz, J.-M. 2005 Global instabilities in spatially developing flows: non-normality and nonlinearity. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37, 357–392.Google Scholar
Chu, B. 1965 On the energy transfer to small disturbances in fluid flow (Part I). Acta Mechanica 1 (3), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desquesnes, G., Terracol, M. & Sagaut, P. 2007 Numerical investigation of the tone noise mechanism over laminar airfoils. J. Fluid Mech. 591, 155–182.Google Scholar
Giannetti, F. & Luchini, P. 2007 Structural sensitivity of the first instability of the cylinder wake. J. Fluid Mech. 581, 167–197.Google Scholar
Hanifi, A., Schmid, P. J. & Henningson, D. S. 1996 Transient growth in compressible boundary layer flow. Phys. Fluids 8, 826.Google Scholar
Hernández, V., Román, J. E. & Vidal, V. 2005 SLEPc: a scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 31 (3), 351–362.Google Scholar
Hill, D. C.1992 A theoretical approach for analyzing the restabilization of wakes. NASA Tech. Rep. 103858.Google Scholar
Hill, D. 1995 Adjoint systems and their role in the receptivity problem for boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 292, 183–204.Google Scholar
Jones, L. E. & Sandberg, R. D. 2011 Numerical analysis of tonal airfoil self-noise and acoustic feedback-loops. J. Sound Vib. 330, 6137–6152.Google Scholar
Kingan, M. J. & Pearse, J. R. 2009 Laminar boundary layer instability noise produced by an aerofoil. J. Sound Vib. 322 (4–5), 808–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. K. 1992 Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1), 16–42.Google Scholar
Lodato, G., Domingo, P. & Vervisch, L. 2008 Three-dimensional boundary conditions for direct and large-eddy simulation of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (10), 5105–5143.Google Scholar
Luchini, P. & Bottaro, A. 2014 Adjoint equations in stability analysis. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46, 493–517.Google Scholar
Marquet, O., Sipp, D. & Jacquin, L. 2008 Sensitivity analysis and passive control of cylinder flow. J. Fluid Mech. 615, 221–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, E. C., Lowson, M. V. & McAlpine, A. 1999 Boundary-layer instability noise on aerofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 382, 27–61.Google Scholar
Fosas de Pando, M., Schmid, P. J. & Sipp, D. 2014 A global analysis of tonal noise in flow around aerofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 754, 5–38.Google Scholar
Fosas de Pando, M., Sipp, D. & Schmid, P. J. 2012 Efficient evaluation of the direct and adjoint linearized dynamics from compressible flow solvers. J. Comput. Phys. 231 (23), 7739–7755.Google Scholar
Paterson, R. W., Vogt, P. G., Fink, M. R. & Much, C. L. 1973 Vortex noise of isolated airfoils. J. Aircraft 10 (5), 296–302.Google Scholar
Poinsot, T. J. & Lele, S. K. 1992 Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1), 104–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pröbsting, S., Serpieri, J. & Scarano, F. 2014 Experimental investigation of aerofoil tonal noise generation. J. Fluid Mech. 747, 656–687.Google Scholar
Sesterhenn, J. 2000 A characteristic-type formulation of the Navier–Stokes equations for high order upwind schemes. Comput. Fluids 30 (1), 37–67.Google Scholar