Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T01:00:49.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Gunn effect and other physical examples of perturbed conservation equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 March 2006

J. D. Murray
J. D. Murray
Affiliation:
Courant Institute, New York University Present address: Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many situations of practical importance both in fluid mechanics and elsewhere are governed by perturbed forms of conservation laws. Generally the perturbations are in the nature of positive dissipation terms in the sense that any initial disturbance from a uniform state ultimately decays to that state. Diverse examples of these are discussed briefly.

A situation in which the perturbation results naturally in a negative dissipation term, in the sense that initial disturbances grow, although not necessarily indefinitely, arises in what has been accepted for a model for the Gunn (1963) effect and other so-called bulk negative resistance effects in semiconductors. The Gunn effect, which is of immense importance in electron-device technology (comparable with transistors), is the appearance of coherent microwave current oscillations in the crystals of a suitable semiconductor, in particular Gallium Arsenide, when they are subjected to a large electric field generally of the order of several kilovolts per centimetre. It now seems to be accepted that the effect is a consequence of the negative resistance (that is the electron drift speed decreases with increasing electric field) properties of the semiconductor crystal.

A typical model with negative resistance properties is described in detail, the resulting perturbed (both singularly and otherwise) non-linear conservation equations ((2.19) and (2.21)) are studied for practical situations of interest and the physical implications discussed in the light of experimental facts. Particular care is given to the shocks or discontinuities that must appear in the solutions when the diffusion is zero. As a result of these comparisons with experiment a simpler model is suggested which should suffice for a large number of practical situations and various quantitative features of this model are given.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , 11 November 1970 , pp. 315 - 346
Copyright
© 1970 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bott, I. B. & Fawcett, W. 1968 The Gunn effect in gallium arsenide. Advances in Microwaves, Vol. III. (Ed. L. Young). Academic.
Burgers, J. M. 1939 Mathematical examples illustrating relations occurring in the theory of turbulent fluid motion. Verhandel. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. 17, 1–53. (See also 1948 A mathematical model illustrating the theory of turbulence. Adv. Appl. Mech. 1, 171–199.)Google Scholar
Butcher, P. N. 1967 The Gunn effect. Rep. Progress in Phys. 30, 97–148.Google Scholar
Butcher, P. N. & Fawcett, W. 1965 The intervalley transfer mechanism of negative resistivity in bulk semiconductors. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. 86, 1205–1219.Google Scholar
Butcher, P. N. & Fawcett, W. 1966 Calculation of the velocity-field characteristic for gallium arsenide. Phys. Lett. 21, 489–490.Google Scholar
Butcher, P. N., Fawcett, W. & Hilsum, C. 1966 A simple analysis of stable domain propagation in the Gunn effect. Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 17, 841–850.Google Scholar
Case, K. M. & Chu, C. S. 1969 Burgers’ turbulence models. Phys. Fluids, 12, 1799–1809.
Conwell, E. M. & Vassell, M. O. 1966 High field distribution function in GaAs. Trans Inst. Elect. Electron. Engrs, Electron Devices, 13, 22–27.Google Scholar
Courant, R. & Hilbert, D. 1962 Methods of Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2. Interscience.
Dunwoody, J. 1968 High-frequency sound waves in ideal gases with internal dissipation. J. Fluid Mech. 34, 769.Google Scholar
Gel'Fand, I. M. 1959 Some problems of the theory of quasilinear equations. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 14, 87–158. (English translation 1960, Office of Tech. Services, U.S. Dept. Commerce, Washington, D.C.)Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. 1953 On the mathematics of exchange processes in fixed columns. I and II. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 219, 151–185.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. & Murray, J. D. 1959 On the mathematics of exchange processes in fixed columns. III, IV, and V. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 252, 334–375.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. B. 1963 Microwave oscillations of current in III — V semiconductors. Solid State Commun. 1, 88–91.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. B. 1964 Instabilities in III — V semiconductors. IBM J. Res. Develop. 8, 141–159.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. B. 1967 Solid-state microwave devices: domain and LSA modes. Electro-Technology, August, 69–75.Google Scholar
Hilsum, C. 1962 Transferred electron amplifiers and oscillators. Proc. IRE 50, 185–189.Google Scholar
Hutson, A. R., Jayaraman, A., Chynoweth, A. G., Coriell, A. S. & Feldman, W. L. 1965 Mechanism of the Gunn effect from a pressure measurement. Phys. Rev. Letters, 14, 639–641.Google Scholar
Knight, B. W. & Peterson, G. A. 1966 Nonlinear analysis of the Gunn effect. Phys. Rev. 147, 617–621.Google Scholar
Kroemer, H. 1964 Theory of the Gunn effect. Proc. IEEE (correspondence) 52, 1736.Google Scholar
Kroemer, H. 1968 Negative conductance in semiconductors. IEEE Spectrum, 5, 47–56.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D. 1968 Singular perturbations of a class of nonlinear hyperbolic and parabolic equations. J. Math. Phys. 47, 111–133.Google Scholar
Murray, J. D. 1970 Perturbations of nonlinear first order wave equations and their effect on discontinuous solutions. S.I.A.M. J. Appl. Math. (in press).Google Scholar
OleíNik, O. A. 1957 Discontinuous solutions of nonlinear differential equations. Uspehi Mat. Nauk. 12, 3–73. (English Translation. 1963 AMS Translations, Series 2, 26, 95–173.)Google Scholar
Ridley, B. K. & Watkins, T. B. 1961 The possibility of negative resistance effects in semiconductors. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. 78, 293–304.Google Scholar
Ridley, B. K. & Wisbey, P. H. 1967 Nonlinear theory of electrical domain in the presence of trapping. Brit. J. Appl. Phys. 18, 761–771.Google Scholar
Ruch, J. G. & Kino, G. S. 1967 Measurement of the velocity field characteristic of gallium arsenide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 10, 40–42.Google Scholar
Seliger, R. L. 1968 A note on the breaking of waves. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 303, 493–496.Google Scholar
Seymour, B. R. & Varley, E. 1970 High frequency, periodic disturbances in dissipative systems. Part I. Small amplitude, finite rate theory. Proc. Roy. Soc. A (in press).Google Scholar
Sze, S. M. 1969 Physics of Semiconductor Devices. Wiley.
Varley, E. & Cumberbatch, E. 1966 Non-linear, high frequency sound waves. J. Inst. Math. Applic. 2, 133–143.Google Scholar
Whitham, G. B. 1967 Variational methods and applications to water waves. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 299, 6–25.Google Scholar