Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:42:11.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the flow field induced by a hovering rotor or a static jet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2012

Philippe R. Spalart*
Affiliation:
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, PO Box 3707, Seattle, WA 98124, USA
*
Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

Abstract

The flow in the far field of an isolated static momentum source is considered, taking into account the entrainment of fluid by the turbulent jet which develops far downstream irrespective of the type of device. The result is a simple analytical model for the irrotational region, which depends only on the thrust applied. This equation is implied by Stewart (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 1, 1956, pp. 593–606) for a jet. For a rotor, the model is radically different from the classical one derived from an actuator disk without turbulence or mixing in the wake, which led to a sink flow in the far field. The velocities decay like rather than , where is the radius, and are everywhere directed in the direction opposite to the thrust, rather than pointing towards the origin. The momentum source drives a co-flow which converges towards the turbulent region, thus supplying the entrained fluid. This flow pattern supports the assumption that the fluid surrounding the turbulent region is irrotational, better than the sink-flow model would. The model depends only on one empirical constant, a measure of the entrainment in a fully developed jet, for which a range of values is determined from the experimental literature. If the rotor is climbing, the sink flow is recovered; however, the limit of that equation as the climb velocity tends to zero, leading to hover, is singular. For both jets and rotors, this model used in a boundary condition should eliminate extraneous parameters and reduce the computational cost of numerical simulations, and may guide the design of chambers used for experiments, following Ricou & Spalding (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 11, 1960, pp. 21–32).

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Buning, P. & Chaderjian, N. 2011 High resolution Navier–Stokes simulation of rotor wakes. In 67th American Helicopter Society International Annual Forum 2011, Curran Associates, pp. 375–392.Google Scholar
2. Crow, S. C. & Champagne, F. H. 1970 Orderly structure in jet turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 48 (3), 547591.Google Scholar
3. Dziubinski, A. & Stalewski, W. 2007 Vortex ring state simulation using actuator disk. In Proc. 21st Eur. Conf. Mod. Sim., ECMS 2007.Google Scholar
4. Falcone, A. M. & Cataldo, J. C. 2003 Entrainment velocity in an axisymmetric turbulent jet. J. Fluids Engng 125, 620627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Ricou, F. P. & Spalding, D. B. 1960 Measurements of entrainment by axisymmetrical turbulent jets. J. Fluid Mech. 11 (1), 2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Schlichting, H. 1979 Boundary Layer Theory. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
7. Shur, M. L., Spalart, P. R. & Strelets, M. K. 2011 LES-based evaluation of a microjet noise reduction concept in static and flight conditions. J. Sound Vib. 330 (17), 40834097.Google Scholar
8. Spalart, P. R. 2003 On the simple actuator disk. J. Fluid Mech. 494, 399405.Google Scholar
9. Stewart, R. W. 1956 Irrotational motion associated with turbulent flows. J. Fluid Mech. 1, 593606.Google Scholar
10. Strawn, R. & Ahmad, J. 2000 Computational modelling of hovering rotors and wakes. AIAA paper 2000-0110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar