Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:34:14.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the aerodynamic forces on heaving and pitching airfoils at low Reynolds number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2017

M. Moriche Open the ORCID record for M. Moriche [Opens in a new window] ,
O. Flores Open the ORCID record for O. Flores [Opens in a new window]  and
M. García-Villalba Open the ORCID record for M. García-Villalba [Opens in a new window]
M. Moriche*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain
O. Flores
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain
M. García-Villalba
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bioingeniería e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganés, Spain
*
†Email address for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The influence that the kinematics of pitching and heaving 2D airfoils has on the aerodynamic forces is investigated using direct numerical simulations and a force decomposition algorithm. Large-amplitude motions are considered (of the order of one chord), with moderate Reynolds numbers and reduced frequencies of order $O(1)$, varying the mean pitch angle and the phase shift between the pitching and heaving motions. Our results show that the surface vorticity contribution (viscous effect) to the aerodynamic force is negligible compared with the contributions from the body motion (fluid inertia) and the vorticity within the flow (circulation). For the range of parameters considered here, the latter tends to be instantaneously oriented in the direction normal to the chord of the airfoil. Based on the results discussed in this paper, a reduced-order model for the instantaneous aerodynamic force is proposed, taking advantage of the force decomposition and the chord-normal orientation of the contribution from vorticity within the flow to the total aerodynamic force. The predictions of the proposed model are compared with those of a similar model from the literature, showing a noticeable improvement in the prediction of the mean thrust, and a smaller improvement in the prediction of the mean lift and the instantaneous force coefficients.

JFM classification

Aerodynamics: Aerodynamics Biological Fluid Dynamics: Swimming/flying
Type
Papers
Information
Journal of Fluid Mechanics , Volume 828 , 10 October 2017 , pp. 395 - 423
Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 Cambridge University Press 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, A., Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2005 Unsteady aerodynamics of fluttering and tumbling plates. J. Fluid Mech. 541, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. M., Streitlien, K., Barret, K. S. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 1998 Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency. J. Fluid Mech. 360, 41–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansari, R., Zbikowski, R. & Knowles, K. 2006 Aerodynamic modelling of insect-like flapping flight for micro air vehicles. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 42, 129–172.Google Scholar
Ashraf, M. A., Young, J. & Lai, J. C. S. 2011 Reynolds number, thickness and camber effects on flapping airfoil propulsion. J. Fluids Struct. 27, 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baik, Y. S., Bernal, L. P., Granlund, K. & Ol, M. V. 2012 Unsteady force generation and vortex dynamics of pitching and plunging aerofoils. J. Fluid Mech. 709, 37–68.Google Scholar
Carr, L. W. 1988 Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall. J. Aircraft 25 (1), 6–17.Google Scholar
Chang, C.-C. 1992 Potential flow and forces for incompressible viscous flow. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437, 517–525.Google Scholar
Choi, J., Colonius, T. & Williams, D. R. 2015 Surging and plunging oscillations of an airfoil at low Reynolds number. J. Fluid Mech. 763, 237–253.Google Scholar
Dickinson, M. H., Lehmann, F.-O. & Sane, S. P. 1999 Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284 (5422), 1954–1960.Google Scholar
von Ellenrieder, K. D., Parker, K. & Soria, J. 2008 Fluid mechanics of flapping wings. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 32, 1578–1589.Google Scholar
Ellington, C. P., Van Den Berg, C., Willmott, A. P. & Thomas, A. L. R. 1996 Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature 384, 626–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fung, Y. C. 2002 An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity. Courier Corporation.Google Scholar
Jones, K. D. & Platzer, M. F.1997 Numerical computation of flapping-wing propulsion and power extraction. AIAA Paper AIAA-97-0826.Google Scholar
Lewin, G. C. & Haj-Hariri, H. 2003 Modelling thrust generation of a two-dimensional heaving airfoil in a viscous flow. J. Fluid Mech. 492, 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, L. N. & Fritz, T. E. 2004 Object-oriented unsteady vortex lattice method for flapping flight. J. Aircraft 41 (6), 1275–1290.Google Scholar
Lua, K. B., Lim, T. T., Yeo, K. S. & Oo, G. Y. 2007 Wake-structure formation of a heaving two-dimensional elliptic airfoil. AIAA J. 45, 1571–1583.Google Scholar
Martín-Alcántara, A., Fernandez-Feria, R. & Sanmiguel-Rojas, E. 2015 Vortex flow structures and interactions for the optimum thrust efficiency of a heaving airfoil at different mean angles of attack. Phys. Fluids 27 (7), 073602.Google Scholar
Mittal, R., Dong, H., Bozkurttas, M., Najjar, F. M., Vargas, A. & Von Loebbecke, A. 2008 A versatile sharp interface immersed boundary method for incompressible flows with complex boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (10), 4825–4852.Google Scholar
Moriche, M.2017 A numerical study on the aerodynamic forces and the wake stability of flapping flight at low Reynolds number. PhD thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid.Google Scholar
Moriche, M., Flores, O. & García-Villalba, M. 2015 Generation of thrust and lift with airfoils in plunging and pitching motion. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 574, 012163.Google Scholar
Moriche, M., Flores, O. & García-Villalba, M. 2016 Three-dimensional instabilities in the wake of a flapping wing at low Reynolds number. Intl J. Heat Fluid Flow 62A, 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noca, F., Shiels, D. & Jeon, D. 1999 A comparison of methods for evaluating time-dependent fluid dynamic forces on bodies, using only velocity fields and their derivatives. J. Fluids Struct. 13 (5), 551–578.Google Scholar
Pesavento, U. & Wang, Z. J. 2004 Falling paper: Navier–Stokes solutions, model of fluid forces, and center of mass elevation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (14), 144501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Platzer, M. F., Jones, K. D., Young, J. & Lai, J. C. S. 2008 Flapping-wing aerodynamics: progress and challenges. AIAA J. 46 (9), 2136–2149.Google Scholar
Ramamurti, R. & Sandberg, W. 2001 Simulation of flow about flapping airfoils using finite element incompressible flow solver. AIAA J. 39 (2), 253–260.Google Scholar
Read, D. A., Hover, F. S. & Triantafyllou, M. S. 2003 Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering. J. Fluids Struct. 17 (1), 163–183.Google Scholar
Rozhdestvensky, K. V. & Ryzhov, V. A. 2003 Aerohydrodynamics of flapping-wing propulsors. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 585–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sedov, L. I. 1965 Two-dimensional Problems in Hydrodynamics and Aerodynamics. Interscience Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Chimakurthi, S. K., Trizila, P., Kang, C.-K., Cesnik, C. E. S. & Liu, H. 2010 Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 46, 284–327.Google Scholar
Shyy, W., Aono, H., Kang, C.-K. & Liu, H. 2013 An Introduction to Flapping Wing Aerodynamics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Taha, H. E., Hajj, M. R. & Beran, P. S. 2014 State-space representation of the unsteady aerodynamics of flapping flight. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 34, 1–11.Google Scholar
Taha, H. E., Hajj, M. R. & Nayfeh, A. H. 2012 Flight dynamics and control of flapping-wing MAVs: a review. Nonlinear Dyn. 70 (2), 907–939.Google Scholar
Theodorsen, T.1949 General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter. NACA Tech. Rep.Google Scholar
Uhlmann, M. 2005 An immersed boundary method with direct forcing for the simulation of particulate flows. J. Comput. Phys. 209 (2), 448–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, H. 1925 Über die Entstehung des dynamischen Auftriebes von Tragflügeln. Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 5 (1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, S., Zhang, X., He, G. & Liu, T. 2015 Evaluation of lift formulas applied to low-Reynolds-number unsteady flows. AIAA J. 53 (1), 161–175.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. J. 2000 Vortex shedding and frequency selection in flapping flight. J. Fluid Mech. 410, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, Z. & Zheng, Z. C. 2014 Mechanisms of wake deflection angle change behind a heaving airfoil. J. Fluids Struct. 48, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widmann, A. & Tropea, C. 2015 Parameters influencing vortex growth and detachment on unsteady aerodynamic profiles. J. Fluid Mech. 773, 432–459.Google Scholar
Wu, J. Z., Pan, Z. L. & Lu, X. Y. 2005 Unsteady fluid-dynamic force solely in terms of control-surface integral. Phys. Fluids 17 (9), 098102.Google Scholar

Moriche et al. supplementary movie

Contours of spanwise vorticity (left), thrust density (center) and lift density (right) of case B090. Same as Figure 6 in the full paper.

Download Moriche et al. supplementary movie(Video)
Video 2.6 MB